The_Showstopper
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2011
- Messages
- 6,708
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
I am convinced that you haven't gone through the entire conversation but a couple of posts mine and formed your opinion and you are free to do so...Fair enough...however being in discussions on few points and few threads does play its part in making perceptions about each other.
I think it's you who initially got confused. Please look at your previous statement...Look please don't confuse things...We need such a scheme is failure of the government who have ruled us for almost 6 decades...this is what i meant...which is evident from your explanation above...Now as far as the scheme goes then it has many shortcomings..leakages being the biggest issue...Is this scheme the best way of removing poverty, i have my doubts, however, India has already committed itself into this scheme......but then it is easy to scribble few lines on a blogging site then to face chronic poverty and hunger...so i will leave it to the government to draw the roadmap on how to remove poverty in parallel to this scheme...
deckingraj said: ↑
This scheme is a failure because even after 6 decades of independence we still need such a scheme to keep our humungous work force busy with unskilled work...
To which I questioned you as to how you can attribute a scheme's failure just because it is still needed, But in your present post you did correct yourself by stating the bolded part....
Aren't we speaking if this has helped the poor or not, and I believe that it did help them atleast to partially satiate their hunger. The point was never about the elimination of poverty. This needs much more than a MNREGA....If supporting poor means - always keep them hand to mouth and a little less yet chronic poor..then YES it does support... "NO"...if you mean supporting poor is giving them a platform to raise above the poverty level so that they can take care of themselves and doesn't need any help from the state...