Militants attack Army base in Kashmir; one soldier killed, gunfight still on

[janon]

It's Pakistan, not "pureland". Get the name correct please.

Don't they mean the same thing?

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

No one has yet blamed Pakistan, well I don't but people know such kind of modus operandi is Pakistani tactic.

The insurgents disguised themselves and carried out an attack against security forces - that is pretty standard 'modus operandi' for insurgent groups everywhere around the world, so since when did Pakistan hold the patent on this?

 

[janon]

So you agree that these insurgents (if they did in fact cross across the LoC/WB) do not need the support of the PA/Rangers to conduct their attacks or "infiltration", given their ability to infiltrate highly secure military bases in Pakistan to carry out attacks on the Pakistani military.

Whether they need the support of Pak's state actors or not, the fact remains that Pak's non-state actors are responsible for terrorism, both within Pak as well as India and the rest of the world.

Also, your conclusion is not warranted - they could attack the GHQ of the country they resided in, but they could still need support of the "state actors" to be able to cross heavily guarded and militarized international borders.

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

Don't they mean the same thing?

No.

 

[janon]

No.

What is the literal meaning of 'Pakistan'? Isn't it "land of the pure"?

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

Also, your conclusion is not warranted - they could attack the GHQ of the country they resided in, but they could still need support of the "state actors" to be able to cross heavily guarded and militarized international borders.

It is completely warranted - both instances of infiltration involve breaching multiple layers of security, in fact, given that the LoC/WB consists of thousands of miles of extremely inhospitable terrain at many points, infiltrating the LoC/IB would be an easier challenge than breaching the multiple layers of defence at a small static installation like the military bases.

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

What is the literal meaning of 'Pakistan'? Isn't it "land of the pure"?

It is an acronym for the provinces that make up Pakistan, and we call the country Pakistan and its citizens Pakistanis. Please use the correct terms, not the "translation" in English that you feel like.

 

[aks18]

Whether they need the support of Pak's state actors or not, the fact remains that Pak's non-state actors are responsible for terrorism, both within Pak as well as India and the rest of the world.

Also, your conclusion is not warranted - they could attack the GHQ of the country they resided in, but they could still need support of the "state actors" to be able to cross heavily guarded and militarized international borders.

Yes, Hafiz Saeed Trained MODI how to kill Muslims in Gujrat and how he can burn them alive

 

[PoKeMon]

So you agree that these insurgents (if they did in fact cross across the LoC/WB) do not need the support of the PA/Rangers to conduct their attacks or "infiltration", given their ability to infiltrate highly secure military bases in Pakistan to carry out attacks on the Pakistani military.

Playing with the words huh?

Infiltrating and then fighting PA is completely different to infiltrating into India while PA keeps a blind eye.

By the way, why is it so that even though border is so heavily militarised at pakistan side as well, not a single instance of pak rangers intercepting the infiltrators leave alone arresting the few?

However, its a dubious coincidence that when they infiltrate, pak rangers start firing on Indian posts.

Misplaced targets?

 

[janon]

It is completely warranted - both instances of infiltration involve breaching multiple layers of security, in fact, given that the LoC/WB consists of thousands of miles of extremely inhospitable terrain at many points, infiltrating the LoC/IB would be an easier challenge than breaching the multiple layers of defence at a small static installation like the military bases.

That logic works both ways - defending and monitoring a small static installation is a lot easier than defending and monitoring thousands of miles of extremely inhospitable terrain.

 

[janon]

Yes, Hafiz Saeed Trained MODI how to kill Muslims in Gujrat and how he can burn them alive

You do know that hindus were also killed in theGujarat riots, right?

 

[janon]

It is an acronym for the provinces that make up Pakistan, and we call the country Pakistan and its citizens Pakistanis. Please use the correct terms, not the "translation" in English that you feel like.

I know that it is often explained as an acronym, but the word "Pak" itself means holy/pure in Perisan, and that is why it was chosen as the name of the country. It's not an acronym, but a backronym - if the word "pak" did not exist, it would not have been chosen as the name.

 

[aks18]

That logic works both ways - defending and monitoring a small static installation is a lot easier than defending and monitoring thousands of miles of extremely inhospitable terrain.

very sad to know hinduz also got killed by retaliation of muslims it was obvious

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

Playing with the words huh?

Infiltrating and then fighting PA is completely different to infiltrating into India while PA keeps a blind eye.

By the way, why is it so that even though border is so heavily militarised at pakistan side as well, not a single instance of pak rangers intercepting the infiltrators leave alone arresting the few?

However, its a dubious coincidence that when they infiltrate, pak rangers start firing on Indian posts.

Misplaced targets?

See my previous reply to Janon - it should in fact be easier to infiltrate across thousands of miles of LoC/IB in inhospitable terrain than breach defences at a static military installation.

And firing between the Rangers and BSF has been going on for weeks now, started by your ranting and raving Modi who had also claimed weeks ago that "India had shut Pakistan's mouth", and looked like a fool when the Pakistani military continued responding to the unprovoked Indian ceasefire violations.

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

I know that it is often explained as an acronym, but the word "Pak" itself means holy/pure in Perisan, and that is why it was chosen as the name of the country. It's not an acronym, but a backronym - if the word "pak" did not exist, it would not have been chosen as the name.

Yet no Pakistani calls their country "pureland" or themselves "purelanders" - please stick to the correct and official name of the country and her citizens instead of resorting to snide attempts to denigrate by using a "translation".