What's new

Massive Japanese Protest Against a New US Military Base in Okinawa Island

Okinawan people united in single growing voice against war, discrimination - Xinhua | English.news.cn
English.news.cn 2015-05-18 09:46:30
by Liu Tian

NAHA, Japan, May 18 (Xinhua) -- Okinawa, Japan's southernmost prefecture, is now more zealously expressing its opinion to the world as the tiny island, accounting for less than 1 percent of Japan's territory, is upping its struggle against the Japanese and U.S. governments that are once again trying to make Okinawa an armed stronghold.

It is a timely and, for now, peaceful appeal for the once war- torn island, with its ghosts of war still looming large here, as Japan and the United States revised their defense guidelines for the first time in 18 years with a greater role for the Japanese Self-Defense Forces (SDF) to assist the U.S. "pivot to Asia" with its conflicts in the Middle East also in focus.

Geographically important Okinawa will undoubtedly be on the top of the Japan-U.S. list for their garrison locations so as to easily meddle in regional affairs in a saber-rattling way as an increasing amount of advanced military hardware, such as the MV-22 Osprey and Patriot Advanced Capability -3 surface-to-air missile system, have been deployed on the island by both countries.

Furthermore, the hawkish leader, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, rammed a series of security-related bills past the ruling coalition and filed the "war bills" in the current Diet session, with an eye to enacting the bills, which will pave the way to legally dispatch the SDF globally with a relaxed limit on its use of force, next month by exploiting the ruling bloc's comfortable majority in parliament.

"Abe's administration is playing a war game under the banner of his 'proactive pacifism,' but its support rate is relatively high and this strange trend worries me a lot," said former Okinawa Governor Masahide Ota, declaring that Japan should be kept far away from war as Okinawa was used as the knight that was sacrificed during World War II to save the "queen" -- the Japanese mainland.

Ota experienced the war seven decades ago when he was a high school student. That hellish battle, which was codenamed the " Typhoon of Steel," claimed 200,656 lives, including 122,228 Okinawans -- 94,000 of whom were civilians -- meaning that one in four Okinawan residents were killed in this battle.

Bearing the agonizing history of Okinawans being forced by the Imperial Army to commit mass suicide, Ota said that the barbarity showed that Japan strongly discriminated against Okinawan people and such discrimination can still be seen today with the central government's iron stance and senior officials' prejudice against Okinawa being just a few of the contemporary examples.

Okinawa, covering just 0.6-percent of Japan's land mass, however, hosts 74 percent of U.S. bases in Japan and there will be a new military base built in the Henoko region to replace the dated U.S. Futenma airbase, because the other 46 prefectures in mainland Japan reject hosting the base, leaving Okinawa to maintain its historical status quo as the "runt of Japan."


"Isn't it discrimination?" asked Masaru Sato during a 35,000- strong rally held here Sunday. The former official of the Foreign Ministry and now commentator on Okinawa affairs said he will choose Okinawa if there are two choices for him -- be Japanese or be Okinawan.

"If discrimination is rooted in the social system, the perpetrator will not be aware of its wrongdoings, and the resistance by the victim, however, would be considered as willful, " Sato indicated, suggesting that such a case is happening in Okinawa. He added that, "only protesting could reveal the fact that Okinawa has been discriminated against by the Japanese government, especially on the base issue."

Also during Sunday's mass gathering, Okinawa Governor Takeshi Onaga said that he will make "all-out efforts" to block the transfer of the U.S. Futenma airbase within his prefecture. The governor, who was elected with a big win against his predecessor Hirokazu Nakaima, a defector on the thorny issue, also questioned "how long should Okinawa continue to sacrifice itself for the Japan-U.S. defense alliance?"

The war legislation and the Futenma relocation issue are all highly relevant to Abe's policy of recasting the peaceful path Japan has pursued for 70 years after WWII, which was based on its war-renouncing Constitution, and the Japanese supreme law itself is also in danger due to Abe's ultra-right politics, with protesters commenting that the hollowing out of both of them could make Okinawa a frontline for conflicts.

Ota, a veteran and seasoned politician, said that Okinawa was once excluded from the globally-welcomed pacifist Constitution for 27 years, as Okinawa was occupied by the United State since the end of WWII.

"Okinawa people's dignity and basic rights could not be protected by the Constitution at that time," said the grandmaster on the subject, adding that the rights they have now are from their tough fight demanding Okinawa's reversion to Japan. "If the Constitution were revised, it means that 70 years of struggling by the Okinawa people would be in vain and we will never allow that happen," Ota told Xinhua on Friday, the 43rd anniversary of Okinawa's return to Japan.

At the time when the international community marks the 70th anniversary of the end of WWII and calls for peace, Okinawa will make its choice to follow the world tide of peace and stability, while Abe's Japan will be increasingly isolated from the East Asian region and the international community, and for this reason, the Okinawa people have a pretty chance to look down upon big potatoes planted in Nagatacho and Kasumigaseki.

Sato said that Okinawa people are forming a clear sense of Okinawan identity; prioritizing peace and nature, which differs from Tokyo, adding the islands belonged, belong and will belong to the people here.

Among many speakers in Sunday's rally, a senior student of the Okinawa International University evoked Okinawa's bitter memory of the deadly crash of a U.S. military plane at the university's campus and expressed her hope, echoing Sato's, that "such beautiful sea and such blue sky not belong to the United States, not belong to Japan and definitely not belong to Prime Minister Shinzo Abe," stating unequivocally that they belong to Okinawa.

Editor: Tian Shaohui
 
. .
Rubbish propaganda, lol.

lol I think people don't really understand one point

Okinawa is not a country, they don't have anything to do with deciding who to station what in Okinawa.

It is like Hong Kong people don't want to have a PLA garrison stationed in Hong Kong, lol, they don't have a say in it.
 
.
lol I think people don't really understand one point

Okinawa is not a country, they don't have anything to do with deciding who to station what in Okinawa.

It is like Hong Kong people don't want to have a PLA garrison stationed in Hong Kong, lol, they don't have a say in it.

Well said. Also, these 35,000 opposition folks are nonrepresentative since there is close to 2 million Japanese that live in Okinawa Prefecture.

The protesters can voice out their opinion , but in the end they have to understand the dynamics of gubernatorial, legislative and judicial review.

The same way as those Hong Kong protests did not ultimately influence national politics in China.

These rallies are necessary as it allows angry , dissatisfied folks to release their angst. It is like in Oriental Medicine where one has to remove bad Ki and allow balance of the energies.

lol
 
.
Well, no. I did not forcefully put US into the equation.

Because if you said that, you actually saying US does not have any stake and does not belong in Asia, but that is simply not true, the US have quite a lot of interest in Asia itself, long before China or even japan come into power. US govern Guam, Saipan and the Mariana Island since before 1900s, and the Hawaii is always the transpacific gateway. Those are the US interest right there, even before all the power play and talk begin.

well yeah i do know that US does have its own interest , so do China and Russia .. but again you cant be in a region with a huge Military might , and say that we are there to balance the region , because the Intentions of US is always unclear , cause after all its all about National Interest isnt it ?

At any given point in the last centuries (1900-2000) almost every country in Asia were at war with other country in Asia, Iran and Iraq in the 1980, Cambodia and Vietnam in the 1970, Thailand and Vietnam in the 1970, China and Taiwan in the 1950, Russia and China in the 1969, China and Vietnam in 1979, North Vietnam and South Vietnam in 1970, North Korea and South Korea in 1950s and finally not to mention Japan conquer half of Asia in WW2 and the Indian and Pakistan situation.

well for that i will just post a Link of Wars in which US was directly or Indirectly Involved ..
List of wars involving the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
( just look at the US involvement in wars in 20th Century )

And when you look at the above conflict, how many were started by the US? US were a part of many of those conflict but in the end, beside Vietnam war, all other war were started by either party vanguarding their own interest. Now you tell me what the US role in these war??

Well may not Start the war's but its not his work to intervene no ?
and the recent Arab Spring wars , its just this Time US is not Against a Trained Army but some bunch of Rebels .. and Terrorists ..
regional wars are now not going to Happen , cause big countries like China , Japan, S.Korea , N.Korea , India , Pakistan all are just focusing on Economies, and they know that if you have strong Economy you can be much more Powerful ..
US has its own Interest to watch over China , that is why you prepare Japan and India against China ..and to complete the nexus , you can bring Vietnam into the Equation ...

US did NOT achieve nothing in Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan. It shows to other people US were not to be messed with, that's the purpose of war actually, War only serve two purpose throughout history, either because of financial gain or projection of power. And the case in Syria, Afghanistan is at the latter case.

you dont have to kill millions in ME just to show that US is not to be messed with , no was Messing with you anyways , you are far from ME , Russian and China , so for them to even invade your land need to Fight USN , which is not a easy thing to do ... but as you know , now US has bases all over the world , US military is so far stretched, that even if you want to keep yourself out of any Conflict , you cant ..
fight Against ISIS is example , US was hesitant to get involved in the first place but eventually they have to intervene , cause the mess was created by the west ..

Contrary to what you said, US did not make trouble nor do they want to conquer Asia, US is sitting pretty on the triparted power sharing in Asia, US have no problem with it, but it's the Chinese and Russian that think otherwise, and if you wanted proof, just look at what you just wrote.

well i disagree with you , if you go in early 1990's , the region was balance with Russian-India , and Pakistan-China as allies , there wont be any wars in Near future , but the US presence in the other side of our border make Pakistan so uncomfortable, cause the Pakistan is in no condition to Trust Americans after what happen with OBL ..
your presences in region makes more trouble , US should go back to the Land :D you guys have plenty of places to explore :D
 
.
Well said. Also, these 35,000 opposition folks are nonrepresentative since there is close to 2 million Japanese that live in Okinawa Prefecture.

The protesters can voice out their opinion , but in the end they have to understand the dynamics of gubernatorial, legislative and judicial review.

The same way as those Hong Kong protests did not ultimately influence national politics in China.

These rallies are necessary as it allows angry , dissatisfied folks to release their angst. It is like in Oriental Medicine where one has to remove bad Ki and allow balance of the energies.

lol

Sigh, they are just trying to dig something up and spell their bad blood about, nothing more, nothing less.
 
.
It is the government that allows the US to stay. If the government goes against the wishes of the people, that is both the people's and the government's fault, not the guest. So who really have the thick skull here ?
So you don't have the respect for the people wish? I thought you are the Great People DEMOCRATIC OF THE WORLD! LOL
 
.
So you don't have the respect for the people wish? I thought you are the Great People DEMOCRATIC OF THE WORLD! LOL

Nah, Japan can just write it off as outside forces from China influencing Okinawan youngsters.

If it can work in Hong Kong it may work in Okinawa.
 
.
So you don't have the respect for the people wish? I thought you are the Great People DEMOCRATIC OF THE WORLD! LOL
Of course we respect the Okinawans. They just have to go thru their legislators, like how the Phis did.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom