What's new

Maldives owes China $1.4bn, says finance minister

nahtanbob

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 24, 2018
Messages
14,105
Reaction score
-57
Country
United States
Location
United States
TOKYO -- The Maldives' Finance Minister Ibrahim Ameer said Thursday that the island nation owes a total of $1.4 billion to China, the same amount that India had pledged in financial aid to the newly elected President Ibrahim Mohamed Solih.

Solih made his first official visit abroad to India on Monday. Ameer explained to reporters in Tokyo that $1.4 billion is the total amount of loans committed by the Chinese, of which $666 million has been drawn down so far. He added after the press conference that the total amount that will be deployed is expected to be $850 million by year end, as Beijing advances its infrastructure projects in the country.

The finance minister further revealed that the interest rates on concessional loans from China are between 1.5% to 2%, while those on loans made under sovereign guarantee are around 6% to 7%. Ameer said that the new government is negotiating the terms of the latter with the Chinese ambassador. "We are mostly looking into increasing the repayment period," he said.


Minister of Economic Development Fayyaz Ismail told the Nikkei Asian Review on the sidelines of the press conference that his government is also reviewing whether any of the projects financed through sovereign guarantees has a "damaging impact on our economy and whether they have been conducted [in] clear and fair [ways]." So far, he said he had not found any issues with ongoing projects.

Maldives, under the former administration of President Abdulla Yameen, took substantial loans from Beijing for infrastructure projects, including bridges, airport and housing developments, falling into what the international community called China's "debt trap."

https%3A%2F%2Fs3-ap-northeast-1.amazonaws.com%2Fpsh-ex-ftnikkei-3937bb4%2Fimages%2F_aliases%2Farticleimage%2F6%2F5%2F3%2F7%2F18547356-1-eng-GB%2FDSC_0634_2048x1152.jpg


The new Solih administration which defeated Yameen in the September election has been recalibrating its foreign policy priorities and rekindling its relationship with India.

Foreign Minister Abdulla Shahid said the newly elected government is pursuing a foreign policy of "good relations with everyone," but he also stressed its "special bond and friendship" with India.

Shahid added: "However much administration in the Maldives tries to push India away, the geographic proximity of the subcontinent remains so with the Maldives," referring to the former government's sway toward China. On the other hand, he described China as "a friend."

On whether the previous government had handed over any of its islands to China, Shahid replied that voters were "clearly sensing the possibility of entire country being sold to foreign country [and] voted out the regime of President Yameen."

He clarified that none of the islands were leased or taken over by any foreign interests besides specific tourism investments, but he stressed that it was the voters that "prevented" this from happening. His remarks were seen as a reference to Sri Lanka's fate.

Sri Lanka, its neighbor, handed over its southern port of Hambantota to the Chinese, headed by state-owned China Merchants Port Holdings, on a 99-year lease, after it failed to repay debts to Beijing. Ameer said: "With the Chinese investments, we see that there is a clear pattern, when we look at the Sri Lankan case."

The International Monetary Fund has warned Maldives that managing the surge in infrastructure investment will be the "main challenge" as it is "creating risks from high and rising public debt."

Along with a widening current-account deficit and low international reserves, it "leaves the Maldives inherently vulnerable under this constellation of risks and reduced policy space," IMF said in a report published last December.

While partially admitting the risk, Ameer pledged to take prudent fiscal measures. He said he would also be transparent about debt management, including the disclosure of loan details on the government website. These are measures that the previous government failed to do. "We can manage the debt situation with the help of the international community," he said.

Although the amount that India has pledged is equivalent to the amount owed to China, Ameer told Nikkei that "there's no relation between that."
 
.
TOKYO -- The Maldives' Finance Minister Ibrahim Ameer said Thursday that the island nation owes a total of $1.4 billion to China, the same amount that India had pledged in financial aid to the newly elected President Ibrahim Mohamed Solih.

Solih made his first official visit abroad to India on Monday. Ameer explained to reporters in Tokyo that $1.4 billion is the total amount of loans committed by the Chinese, of which $666 million has been drawn down so far. He added after the press conference that the total amount that will be deployed is expected to be $850 million by year end, as Beijing advances its infrastructure projects in the country.

The finance minister further revealed that the interest rates on concessional loans from China are between 1.5% to 2%, while those on loans made under sovereign guarantee are around 6% to 7%. Ameer said that the new government is negotiating the terms of the latter with the Chinese ambassador. "We are mostly looking into increasing the repayment period," he said.


Minister of Economic Development Fayyaz Ismail told the Nikkei Asian Review on the sidelines of the press conference that his government is also reviewing whether any of the projects financed through sovereign guarantees has a "damaging impact on our economy and whether they have been conducted [in] clear and fair [ways]." So far, he said he had not found any issues with ongoing projects.

Maldives, under the former administration of President Abdulla Yameen, took substantial loans from Beijing for infrastructure projects, including bridges, airport and housing developments, falling into what the international community called China's "debt trap."

https%3A%2F%2Fs3-ap-northeast-1.amazonaws.com%2Fpsh-ex-ftnikkei-3937bb4%2Fimages%2F_aliases%2Farticleimage%2F6%2F5%2F3%2F7%2F18547356-1-eng-GB%2FDSC_0634_2048x1152.jpg


The new Solih administration which defeated Yameen in the September election has been recalibrating its foreign policy priorities and rekindling its relationship with India.

Foreign Minister Abdulla Shahid said the newly elected government is pursuing a foreign policy of "good relations with everyone," but he also stressed its "special bond and friendship" with India.

Shahid added: "However much administration in the Maldives tries to push India away, the geographic proximity of the subcontinent remains so with the Maldives," referring to the former government's sway toward China. On the other hand, he described China as "a friend."

On whether the previous government had handed over any of its islands to China, Shahid replied that voters were "clearly sensing the possibility of entire country being sold to foreign country [and] voted out the regime of President Yameen."

He clarified that none of the islands were leased or taken over by any foreign interests besides specific tourism investments, but he stressed that it was the voters that "prevented" this from happening. His remarks were seen as a reference to Sri Lanka's fate.

Sri Lanka, its neighbor, handed over its southern port of Hambantota to the Chinese, headed by state-owned China Merchants Port Holdings, on a 99-year lease, after it failed to repay debts to Beijing. Ameer said: "With the Chinese investments, we see that there is a clear pattern, when we look at the Sri Lankan case."

The International Monetary Fund has warned Maldives that managing the surge in infrastructure investment will be the "main challenge" as it is "creating risks from high and rising public debt."

Along with a widening current-account deficit and low international reserves, it "leaves the Maldives inherently vulnerable under this constellation of risks and reduced policy space," IMF said in a report published last December.

While partially admitting the risk, Ameer pledged to take prudent fiscal measures. He said he would also be transparent about debt management, including the disclosure of loan details on the government website. These are measures that the previous government failed to do. "We can manage the debt situation with the help of the international community," he said.

Although the amount that India has pledged is equivalent to the amount owed to China, Ameer told Nikkei that "there's no relation between that."

china exploits poor nations in the same manner .debt trap .
 
. . .
India trying hard to keep its influence in the region. Such investments were made in Afghanistan as well, but look what happened.:disagree:
 
. .
Generally are not the terms, China will own part of the completed project if the loan is not fully repaid. How is that a debt trap? Say China builds a port for Sri Lanka so they can better export their goods. And Sri Lanka can't pay any more, and defaults. China then would have partial ownership of a port there. China gives the opportunity for these to be owned by the local governments/investors, and if they can't pay, what China built, China would partially own.

This is different than some World Bank or IMF coming in with loans to pay for the general funds and if it is defaulted, the world bank and IMF take ownership of something they did not produce or make. That is theft.

If someone comes to you and says he'll build you a 5 million euro home and you find out you can't pay anymore and end up owning only 20% when it is sold, you get back they money you put in. That is different than some loan banker scammer who just gives you money to spend and then takes your home which you already owned.

China is building and giving the opportunity of these nations to own what China builds. If China builds a factory that employs 2.500 and the loan can't be repaid and China ends up owning much of the factory. How is the existence of a factory, some debt that the nation suffers from? Even if partly owned by the Chinese.
 
.
Generally are not the terms, China will own part of the completed project if the loan is not fully repaid. How is that a debt trap? Say China builds a port for Sri Lanka so they can better export their goods. And Sri Lanka can't pay any more, and defaults. China then would have partial ownership of a port there. China gives the opportunity for these to be owned by the local governments/investors, and if they can't pay, what China built, China would partially own.

This is different than some World Bank or IMF coming in with loans to pay for the general funds and if it is defaulted, the world bank and IMF take ownership of something they did not produce or make. That is theft.

If someone comes to you and says he'll build you a 5 million euro home and you find out you can't pay anymore and end up owning only 20% when it is sold, you get back they money you put in. That is different than some loan banker scammer who just gives you money to spend and then takes your home which you already owned.

China is building and giving the opportunity of these nations to own what China builds. If China builds a factory that employs 2.500 and the loan can't be repaid and China ends up owning much of the factory. How is the existence of a factory, some debt that the nation suffers from. Even if partly owned by the Chinese.

none of those projects are economically viable. Why does Sri Lanka need a port ? They already have one. You make it sound none of these countries have infrastructure to begin with

What did China construct in Maldives for $1.4 billion ? Welcome to MoneyLender2.0
 
.
the whole OBOR is a rotten scam by China
LOL... Stupid countries cant manage themselves and benefit and come blame China.

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/new...ping-global-trade-shipping-logistics-10954186

What happen to Italy and Greece and UK gain from China OBOR? Maybe their money is also thru rotten means?

I can understand the feeling of Americans. American continent is not part of OBOR and especially US which close themselves. Sougraped will also claim sour. :enjoy:
 
.
So China investing its money in building infrastructure that other countries wanted is somehow bad, when they could have spent the 1 T euros on stockpiling gold and silver. The latter is forbidden and could start a new opium war. China does not use the trillion in surplus to bomb other countries or do something in Chinese interest (like buying physical gold), they invest their own money into the future of neighbors and it is a called debt trap.

How about the West call the destroyed Syria after Obama's war in Syria a debt trap. Who is going to pay the billions needed to re-build Syria. Trump says to steal the oil and don't pay for the rebuilding and perhaps let the Saudis pay for Syria.

If Maldives did not want bridges and the other projects, they should have said no.

And China footed the bill on more half of one of the bridges Sinamalé Bridge, paying the cost from Chinese taxpayers for free. This is not the behaviour of predatory lending, paying out over 100 euros for a bridge in the Maldives on the backs of the Chinese workers.

China is being blackmailed to prevent China having all the Silver and Gold flooding into Chinese reserves, threatened with a new opium war. This is part of the deal Washington and the capitalists made, China must invest their surplus money in capitalist projects and infrastructure, not on buying Gold and Silver to the measure of 4 T in physical gold silver platinum and palladium.
 
.
Generally are not the terms, China will own part of the completed project if the loan is not fully repaid. How is that a debt trap? Say China builds a port for Sri Lanka so they can better export their goods. And Sri Lanka can't pay any more, and defaults. China then would have partial ownership of a port there. China gives the opportunity for these to be owned by the local governments/investors, and if they can't pay, what China built, China would partially own.

This is different than some World Bank or IMF coming in with loans to pay for the general funds and if it is defaulted, the world bank and IMF take ownership of something they did not produce or make. That is theft.

If someone comes to you and says he'll build you a 5 million euro home and you find out you can't pay anymore and end up owning only 20% when it is sold, you get back they money you put in. That is different than some loan banker scammer who just gives you money to spend and then takes your home which you already owned.

China is building and giving the opportunity of these nations to own what China builds. If China builds a factory that employs 2.500 and the loan can't be repaid and China ends up owning much of the factory. How is the existence of a factory, some debt that the nation suffers from? Even if partly owned by the Chinese.

where did world bank or imf take ownership of the project where repayment was defaulted or not paid ? chinese frauds bribe corrupt leaders of countries by offering them commission on the project cost which costs them double than open tenders , they set and accept terms which are against interests of the exploited countries like srilanka , indonesia , many african countries , even pakistan. no body knows what are the terms on which CPEC is under development .
 
Last edited:
.
Message to China and the Chinese, this is how wicked the West is, they force China to use their surplus money in Capitalist investment, then the West attacks China over helping others through the Belt and Road. The deal was trade with China will continue if China does a b and c. Well one of those allowed for the Belt and Road. What is "not allowed" is massive stockpiling of Gold and Silver. The West broke their end of the deal, so let the precious metals flow into Chinese coffers even if it pisses off all of Europe and Amerika.
 
.
So China investing its money in building infrastructure that other countries wanted is somehow bad, when they could have spent the 1 T euros on stockpiling gold and silver. The latter is forbidden and could start a new opium war. China does not use the trillion in surplus to bomb other countries or do something in Chinese interest (like buying physical gold), they invest their own money into the future of neighbors and it is a called debt trap.

How about the West call the destroyed Syria after Obama's war in Syria a debt trap. Who is going to pay the billions needed to re-build Syria. Trump says to steal the oil and don't pay for the rebuilding and perhaps let the Saudis pay for Syria.

If Maldives did not want bridges and the other projects, they should have said no.

And China footed the bill on more half of one of the bridges Sinamalé Bridge, paying the cost from Chinese taxpayers for free. This is not the behaviour of predatory lending, paying out over 100 euros for a bridge in the Maldives on the backs of the Chinese workers.

China is being blackmailed to prevent China having all the Silver and Gold flooding into Chinese reserves, threatened with a new opium war. This is part of the deal Washington and the capitalists made, China must invest their surplus money in capitalist projects and infrastructure, not on buying Gold and Silver to the measure of 4 T in physical gold silver platinum and palladium.


If building infrastructure makes country rich Saudi Arabia would be a modern developed country.

The only solution to this nonsense is to refuse to pay these debts
"If Maldives did not want bridges and the other projects, they should have said no."

The West did not destroy Syria. Assad did. The Assad clan has ruled Syria for 4 decades.The civil war started before Americans went in. The civil war is bound to happen when one family rules the country for this long.

What does Syria, West have to do with Chinese infrastructure projects in Maldives ? Stay on topic

LOL... Stupid countries cant manage themselves and benefit and come blame China.

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/new...ping-global-trade-shipping-logistics-10954186

What happen to Italy and Greece and UK gain from China OBOR? Maybe their money is also thru rotten means?

I can understand the feeling of Americans. American continent is not part of OBOR and especially US which close themselves. Sougraped will also claim sour. :enjoy:

keep doing what you are doing. getting countries into debt for useless infrastructure that is not needed. Chinese will be known as yellow devils.
 
.
If building infrastructure makes country rich Saudi Arabia would be a modern developed country.

The only solution to this nonsense is to refuse to pay these debts
"If Maldives did not want bridges and the other projects, they should have said no."

The West did not destroy Syria. Assad did. The Assad clan has ruled Syria for 4 decades.The civil war started before Americans went in. The civil war is bound to happen when one family rules the country for this long.

What does Syria, West have to do with Chinese infrastructure projects in Maldives ? Stay on topic

Very good in being selective. I guess you forgot Libya. Maybe you want to claim western never destroy this countries.

https://www.sundaymail.co.zw/libyans-regret-miss-life-under-gaddafi



keep doing what you are doing. getting countries into debt for useless infrastructure that is not needed. Chinese will be known as yellow devils.

Another selective statement. Ethiopian and Kenya are thanking China for giving them high growth. Look at the African comment. They all curse their former evil white colonial master or white invaders for doing nothing to help them until China steps in. :enjoy:

 
.
Very good in being selective. I guess you forgot Libya. Maybe you want to claim western never destroy this countries.

https://www.sundaymail.co.zw/libyans-regret-miss-life-under-gaddafi

Another selective statement. Ethiopian and Kenya are thanking China for giving them high growth. Look at the African comment. They all curse their former evil white colonial master or white invaders for doing nothing to help them until China steps in. :enjoy:


Focus on Maldives - how does Maldives (country of 300,000) get into debt of $1.4 billion ?
It is not like the Golden Gate Bridge cost $1.4 billion
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom