What's new

Majority Pakistanis want legislation to be influenced by Islam, survey reveals

I think you follow the brand of Islam in which Ahmediyyah are Muslims.
I'm not Ahmedi, if that's what you're suggesting, they're considered Muslims internationally. You're completely ignoring my point.

All of them with different sub set enacted to honor the minor differential views of different schools of thought, any more excuses would you like to put forward sir?
You really haven't explained anything, so my point stands. All you did was write a sentence, which explains nothing.

Islam is Islam and rules and regulations are well elaborated and are very similar in all sects as far as rule of Islam is concerned.
(Qadiyani are not Muslims)
Whether or not you consider Ahmedis to be muslims is irrelevant, they're still considered a sect within Islam internationally.

It's not the similarities that I'm talking about, it's the differences. Look at the blasphemy law, every sect practically supports, yet we constantly see them misusing it against each other (especially the Barelvi sect against the Deobandi sect).
 
.
Which brand of Islam are we talking about? Shia? Sunni? Sufi? Ahmediyyah? Barelvi?
I'm not Ahmedi, if that's what you're suggesting.
I am sorry if you felt offended.
Ahmedis are not part of Muslims, they have their separate religion. So by enlisting them in Muslims you are suggesting that they are muslim. Elaborate your statement.

It's not the similarities that I'm talking about, it's the differences. Look at the blasphemy law, every sect practically supports, yet we constantly see them misusing it against each other (especially the Barelvi sect against the Deobandi sect).
Misuse doesn't imply that the whole law is against human rights and should be disbanded immediately. Tell me a single law in human history which cant be misused.
 
. .
Pakistani Exile is a qadiyani so you are actually discussing Islamic laws with a Non Muslim. He is full of hatred against Islamic scholars.

This Qadiani still knows more about Islamic laws than a lot sarkari Musalmans. :coffee:

And who said I hate "Islamic" scholars? There are a few non Ahmadi Muslims scholars I actually do like and sometimes listen to, including Maulana Tariq Jameel and Shaikh Hamza Yusuf. I am afraid the current "Islamic" scholars are not worth the titles they give themselves so I am only left holding on to these two.

While I admire and love and try to follow the great Islamic scholars of the past such as Al Ghazali (rh), Maualan Rumi (rh), Tirmidhi (rh), of course this list doesnt inlcude the four madhab founders and numerous other mujadids that I also love and admire. Please ask me before believing I hate "Islamic" scholars.
 
.
I am sorry if you felt offended.
Ahmedis are not part of Muslims, they have their separate religion. So by enlisting them in Muslims you are suggesting that they are muslim. Elaborate your statement.
Ahmedis are not Muslims says who except Pakistani parliament?

Pakistani Exile is a qadiyani so you are actually discussing Islamic laws with a Non Muslim. He is full of hatred against Islamic scholars.
So what? Aren't you full of hatred for Qadiani scholars?
 
.
I am sorry if you felt offended.
Ahmedis are not part of Muslims, they have their separate religion. So by enlisting them in Muslims you are suggesting that they are muslim. Elaborate your statement.
They're considered Muslims internationally thus my generalization. Even then, I don't have to explain myself, especially since you ignored my points.

Misuse doesn't imply that the whole law is against human rights and should be disbanded immediately. Tell me a single law in human history which cant be misused.
When you have a law that is being misused constantly, then it needs amendment. I'm not saying get rid of it, but amend it so that it cannot be abused by those that have evil intentions, like we're seeing today.

Yet, we see the incompetent CII, and various religious parties, refuse to budge on an issue they all agree needs to be addressed. In fact, when one party suggests that perhaps the law can be amended, they're immediately attacked as blasphemers.
 
.
KARACHI: Around 78 per cent of Pakistan’s population “strictly supports” that the teachings of Holy Quran should influence the country’s laws, a report said.

A research report issued by Pew Research Center on Wednesday titled “Whether Quran should influence laws in countries” posed the question to respondents from 10 countries with significant Muslim populations.

The question was posed in the following words: “Which of the following three statements comes closer to your view: Laws in your country should strictly follow the teachings of the Quran, laws in your country should follow the values and principles of Islam but not strictly follow the teachings of Quran, laws in your country should not be influenced by the teachings of the Quran.”

The report noted a striking variation in the extent to which people think the Holy Quran should influence their nation’s laws.



In Pakistan, the Palestinian territories, Jordan, Malaysia and Senegal, roughly half or more of the full population says that laws in their country should strictly follow the teachings of the Holy Quran, said the report.

By contrast, in Burkina Faso, Turkey, Lebanon and Indonesia, less than a quarter agree for this. While only 13% of Turkish respondents “strictly support” Islamic influence on legislation, Saudi Arabia and Iran were conspicuously absent from the survey despite their considerable Muslim populations.

The second category of respondents – those who feel legislations should be enacted following the principles of Islam but “not strictly” – amassed at 16%.

Only 2 per cent of the approached Pakistani respondents were of the view that the country’s laws should not be influenced by the Holy Quran.



When contacted for a comment, PML-N minority lawmaker Dr. Ramesh Kumar Vankwani told Dawn said that religion should preferably be away from legislation.

“If there is a consensus on following religious practices in legislation then the true essence of the Holy Quran should be implemented — which talks of peace and harmony,” he said.

Dr. Kumar was of the opinion that if Quranic teachings are implemented in legislations then the preaching of other religions should also be used when formulating laws for its followers.

“But this will only see the majority rulings getting approved while those of minorities will face hindrance,” he concluded.



The report shares the main findings of a recent Pew Research Center survey of 10,194 respondents, with results reflecting a full country sample including Muslims and Non-Muslims.

http://www.dawn.com/news/1254770/

@Horus @Oscar @Jango @Gufi @haviZsultan @pak-marine @Spring Onion @Secur
This PEW could found senegal Burkina faso as well as Lebanon Palestine with each 3-4 million people for survey,But could not found Bangladesh where 1 in 10 of all muslim in the world live.Or Bangladeshi muslim's opinion don't count?
 
. .
A frustrated Ahmedi :enjoy:.
We cant ask Britishers or Americans to decides our laws. Our country our rule. Jamhoriat bacha Jamhoriat.
I am a secularist and doesn't care about qadiani beliefs. It's not Parliaments job to declare faith issues. But I am not surprised as Pakistani parliamentarians also runs the development projects so it should be a special "democracy" found nowhere else in the world
 
.
When you have a law that is being misused constantly, then it needs amendment. I'm not saying get rid of it, but amend it so that it cannot be abused by those that have evil intentions, like we're seeing today.
So why we have to just focus on that specific law. Whole judicial system needs to be revived.
 
.
This PEW could found senegal Burkina faso as well as Lebanon Palestine with each 3-4 million people for survey,But could not found Bangladesh where 1 in 10 of all muslim in the world live.Or Bangladeshi muslim's opinion don't count?
dont count :D
 
. . .
not surprising, Pakistan is one of the most religious countries on Earth, I think I saw a poll where 95%+ said they're "very religious"

whatever the people decide should be the law of their land.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom