What's new

Mahmud Ghaznavi, the Afghan-Pak Sultan

Hamza913

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 15, 2015
Messages
8,954
Reaction score
11
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom
Mahmud Ghaznavi was a powerful ruler of the Ghaznavid Empire. He was born in Ghazni, and ruled over the Ghaznavid Empire for a period of 32 years, from 998 to 1030 AD. He was the first ruler to use the title of Sultan, which reflected the fact that he recognised the Abbasid Caliphate as being suzerain over him. He was also the first major Muslim leader to come from South Asia.

Under Ghaznavi, the empire expanded to include most of Afghanistan, Pakistan, Central Asia and Iran, however, the main territories of the Ghaznavid Empire were considered to be Afghanistan and Pakistan, which is reflected by the fact that the two largest cities of the empire existed within the boundaries of those two nations (Ghazni and Lahore). Mahmud Ghaznavi also launched numerous raids into Hindustan, looting and depopulating numerous cities as well as destroying/damaging many statues and temples, such as the famous Soomnath Temple. He even went as far as to vow he would raid Hindustan on a yearly basis for as long as possible.

Ghaznavi maintained a large and powerful army, which mostly consisted of Turks, Pashtuns and Punjabis. Ghaznavi would often use these different ethnic groups to keep each other in check, e.g if Pashtuns started causing trouble he would send Punjabis to deal with them. What's most notable about his military is that it had many people of Hindu origin fighting within it, and even several of his generals were of a Hindu background. However, it can be assumed with relative certainty that these people were only Hindu by birth, and were unlikely to have actually practised the religion since Ghaznavid soldiers we involved in frequent attacks on Hindu holy sites as mentioned earlier. The Ghaznavid army was also the first Muslim army to make use of war elephants.

It was also under Mahmud Ghaznavis rule that Islam and Persian culture was firmly established in Pakistan, with many people from Pakistan converting to Islam (thanks to missionaries) and many foreign Muslims migrating to the region. Since these Muslims were mostly of a Persian background, this also allowed for Persian culture to be established in Pakistan, particularly Lahore which became a hub for Persian culture. The effects of this are still seen today, e.g Urdu has many Farsi loan words and is written in Nastaliq script.

Mahmud Ghaznavi is remembered most fondly by people from Afghanistan and Pakistan. He is liked in Afghanistan because he was born there, developed the region significantly (especially Ghazni) and had many Afghans working in his army and administration. He is liked in Pakistan because he firmly established Islam in the region (which allowed for Pakistan to exist in the first place), developed the region significantly (especially Lahore), brought Persian culture which influenced Pakistan immensely, had many Pakistanis work in his army and administration, brought along with him many people who settled and intermarried with the local population of Pakistan, and because the areas of Baluchistan, KPK and FATA have also been historically associated with Afghanistan. The Pakistani military has also named a missile after him. Many Turks also speak fondly of him as he had Turkic ancestry and employed many Turks in his army and administration.

He is most hated by Hindustanis as he looted and depopulated their country on a regular basis.

Ghaznavid Empire under Mahmud Ghaznavi:

ghaznavid_empire_map.jpg


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahmud_of_Ghazni
http://storyofpakistan.com/mahmud-ghaznavi
http://historypak.com/mahmood-ghaznavi/
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghaznavids

 
. . . .


Mahmud Ghaznavi The Great Son Of Subuktigin Who Was Slave of Alptigin.Alptigin Gave His Daughter In Marriage To His Slave and Then His Kingdom After His Death.

Is There Any Parallel Example In Hindu or Western Christian History Where A Master Gave The Hand Of His Daughter In Marriage To His Slave And Then Made Him His Heir????????
 
.
Mahmud Ghaznavi The Great Son Of Subuktigin Who Was Slave of Alptigin.Alptigin Gave His Daughter In Marriage To His Slave and Then His Kingdom After His Death.

Is There Any Parallel Example In Hindu or Western Christian History Where A Master Gave The Hand Of His Daughter In Marriage To His Slave And Then Made Him His Heir????????

Asalamu Alaikum

Slavery among Muslims was pretty different to slavery among everyone else. Slaves were considered valuable assets and treated rather well, with many such as Muhammad Ghori even considering them to be his children.
 
.
Asalamu Alaikum

Slavery among Muslims was pretty different to slavery among everyone else. Slaves were considered valuable assets and treated rather well, with many such as Muhammad Ghori even considered them to be his children.


I Would Rather Be The Slave To A Turkish Sultan Or Arab Sheikh Than Be The Dalit Slave To A Brahmin.My Chances Of Improvement In Life Would Be Much Better

Napolean Said

"The slave inherits his master's property and marries his daughter. The majority of the Pashas had been slaves. Many of the grand viziers, all the Mamelukes, Ali Ben Mourad Beg, had been slaves. They began their lives by performing the most menial services in the houses of their masters and were subsequently raised in status for their merit or by favour. In the West, on the contrary, the slave has always been below the position of the domestic servants; he occupies the lowest rug. The Romans emancipated their slaves, but the emancipated were never considered as equal to the free-born. The ideas of the East and West are so different that it took a long time to make the Egyptians understand that all the army was not composed of slaves belonging to the Sultan al-Kabir."
 
.
I Would Rather Be The Slave To A Turkish Sultan Or Arab Sheikh Than Be The Dalit Slave To A Brahmin.My Chances Of Improvement In Life Would Be Much Better

Napolean Said

I really wouldn't want to be the slave of a modern day Arab sheikh, but previous ones from back in the day (before they got all the oil) shouldn't have been too bad.
 
.
I really wouldn't want to be the slave of a modern day Arab sheikh, but previous ones from back in the day (before they got all the oil) shouldn't have been too bad.


Agree With You On That
 
. . .
Ghaznavis father was indeed a slave.

Mamluks weren't owned by individuals as much as they were owned by the state...if a Sultan is coup'd off the Mamluks will still serve the state that owns them. They weren't bought or sold off off the shelf like slaves.

It was in every sense of the word a social stratification rather than a commodity (slaves). They were a caste.
 
.
He was a great Leader Indeed !
But what i love most about him is when ,
In 1024 A.D. He sacks the Somnath temple and is reported to have personally hammered the temple's gilded Lingam to pieces:rofl: , and the stone fragments are carted back to Ghazni, where they are incorporated into the steps of the city's new Jama Masjid (Friday Mosque) in 1026 A.D. :lol:
 
.
He was a great Leader Indeed !
But what i love most about him is when ,
In 1024 A.D. He sacks the Somnath temple and is reported to have personally hammered the temple's gilded Lingam to pieces:rofl: , and the stone fragments are carted back to Ghazni, where they are incorporated into the steps of the city's new Jama Masjid (Friday Mosque) in 1026 A.D. :lol:
What's there to be great about him or what he did,unless you think the religion he followed and his god will be proud of him disrespecting others faith.
 
. .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom