What's new

Mahatma Gandhi’s Man Friday reveals… Where was Gandhi on August 15, 1947?

Gadkari

BANNED
Joined
Apr 22, 2017
Messages
3,255
Reaction score
-91
Country
India
Location
India
https://www.pgurus.com/mahatma-gandhis-man-friday-reveals-gandhi-august-15-1947/

While the country was waking up to independence, Mahatma Gandhi was in Beliaghata, a suburb of Kolkata
By Team PGurus -

August 15, 2017
Kalyanam1-696x365.jpg


In the night between August 14 and 15 1947, while Jawaharlal Nehru was making his famous “While the whole world was sleeping…” speech, a 78-year-old frail old man with his entourage was walking along the alleys of what was then Calcutta and pleading with Muslims not to kill the Hindus. “Ill never forget that day. The old man was none other than Mahatma Gandhi, the Father of the Nation, who led the freedom struggle against the mighty British empire through nonviolent means like Satyagraha and fasts. While the whole world was anxious to know the whereabouts of the man who tamed the British, his self-styled disciples let him down by agreeing to do what he had despised, the partition of India,” says Venkataram Kalyanam, the private secretary of Mahatma Gandhi.

“To me, peace between Hindus and Muslims is more important than the declaration of independence,”
– Gandhi

It could be a strange coincidence that Kalyanam was born on 1922 August 15. He shares his birthday, with Indian Independence Day. But Kalyanam, who turns 95 this August 15 never celebrates his birthdays. “There is nothing to celebrate even today after what I have seen in Bengal and Calcutta,” said Kalyanam. He said the general impression is that Mahatma Gandhi was in Naokhali, a province deep inside Bengal on the day India gained independence. “It is not correct. Mahatma Gandhi and his entourage including me had left for Bengal immediately after the breaking out of riots in Calcutta on August 16, 1946, following the Direct Action Day call issued by Mohammed Ali Jinnah. The majority Muslim community launched a pogrom by butchering the Hindus which even the Police or Army could not control. The then chief minister of Bengal Huseyn Shaheed Suhrawardy (he was designated as Bengal Prime Minister) had given orders to cleanse Bengal of all Hindus.

The rioters went on a frenzy and killed all the Hindus whom they could lay their hands on. It was Mahatma Gandhi’s pleadings with them which brought the rioting under control,” he said. According to Kalyanam, more than 10,000 persons were butchered and the majority of them were Hindus. “Both Jinnah and Suhrawardy were Islamic fanatics and wanted the Hindus to be killed. They did nothing to stop the rioting. This part of the history will never be written, Had the victims been Muslims, our historians and liberals would have churned out thousands of books by this time,” said a visibly upset Kalyanam.

Gandhi was totally against the concept of dividing India into two nations.

By early January 1947, Gandhiji and his team had reached Calcutta. “Mahatma went on a padayatra all over Calcutta pleading with the Muslims not to kill their Hindu brethren while requesting the Hindus to be restraint in their reactions. He told the community leaders not to avenge the killings but love and help each other,” reminiscences Kalyanam.

Kalyanam3.jpg

Fig 1.Venkatram Kalyanam, the last Private Secretary of Mahatma Gandhi
He said though Jawaharlal Nehru had asked Gandhiji to return to New Delhi in time for the so called transfer of power, the latter had bluntly denied the invitation. “To me, peace between Hindus and Muslims is more important than the declaration of independence,” Gandhi who was staying at Beliaghata, a suburb 5 km away from Calcutta, told Nehru. Gandhi was totally against the concept of dividing India into two nations. “He was for a united India but Nehru and Jinnah had their own agenda,” said Kalyanam.

Gandhi was successful in restoring peace and normalcy in Bengal. Lord Mountbatten thanked him profusely for the bold act and described Gandhi as a one-man boundary force. “Even if we had sent the para-military forces or the Army, we would not have been able to bring the riots under control. But you were able to do that and I salute you for that achievement,” Mountbatten said in a letter he wrote to Gandhi.

Kalyanam is a treasure house of hitherto unpublished and unreleased information related to India’s freedom struggle. When asked why he was not writing a memoir about his days with the Mahatma, he said in his characteristic style that he is “too small a fry” to venture out for such a mission. “See, I am a small person. My predecessors were Pyarelal and Mahadeo Desai. It was only after their passing away that I was appointed as Mahatma’s private secretary. How can I do something which has not been done by Pyarelal and Desai? They were real Titans who even used to advise the Mahatma,” said Kalyanam.

The name of the person who married Indira was Feroz Ghandy. “How he became Gandhi is a mystery. Mahatma Gandhi had no role in the affair.

Having closely interacted with Jinnah and Suhrawardy, Kalyanam is of the view that both of them were Islamic fundamentalists and Hindu baiters. Kalyanam was the one who took down the Mahatma’s dictation asking for disbanding the Congress party. “Gandhiji had strong reasons for such a demand. The Congress was launched to agitate for Indian independence. It had no other missions. The party could mobilize the countrymen and draw the support of the whole country only because of the cause for which it was fighting. Once the country became free from the Colonial rule, the purpose of Congress too was over. What Gandhi asked the leaders was to disband the organization and set up a Lok Sevak Samithi towards working for the welfare of the whole countrymen,” said Kalyanam.

But the Congress leaders did not heed the suggestion or demand made by Gandhi. “What happened was that under the Congress rule corruption became rampant. I am happy that the government under Narendra Modi is doing well. Modi is proceeding in the right direction,” pointed out Kalyanam.

The current Gandhis are really Ghandys
Kalyanam who turns 95 on this Tuesday (August 15) is disappointed that the new generation does not know much about Mahatma Gandhi. The Gandhis they know are Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, and Priyanka Gandhi. Even the middle aged people are of the wrong impression that Mahatma Gandhi had adopted Indira Gandhi and hence the name,” he said. The name of the person who married Indira was Feroz Ghandy. “How he became Gandhi is a mystery. Mahatma Gandhi had no role in the affair. It could have been done by Feroz with some ulterior motives and see for yourself the damage it has done to the Mahatma’s name,” pointed out Kalyanam.
 
https://www.pgurus.com/mahatma-gandhis-man-friday-reveals-gandhi-august-15-1947/

While the country was waking up to independence, Mahatma Gandhi was in Beliaghata, a suburb of Kolkata
By Team PGurus -

August 15, 2017
Kalyanam1-696x365.jpg


In the night between August 14 and 15 1947, while Jawaharlal Nehru was making his famous “While the whole world was sleeping…” speech, a 78-year-old frail old man with his entourage was walking along the alleys of what was then Calcutta and pleading with Muslims not to kill the Hindus. “Ill never forget that day. The old man was none other than Mahatma Gandhi, the Father of the Nation, who led the freedom struggle against the mighty British empire through nonviolent means like Satyagraha and fasts. While the whole world was anxious to know the whereabouts of the man who tamed the British, his self-styled disciples let him down by agreeing to do what he had despised, the partition of India,” says Venkataram Kalyanam, the private secretary of Mahatma Gandhi.

“To me, peace between Hindus and Muslims is more important than the declaration of independence,”
– Gandhi

It could be a strange coincidence that Kalyanam was born on 1922 August 15. He shares his birthday, with Indian Independence Day. But Kalyanam, who turns 95 this August 15 never celebrates his birthdays. “There is nothing to celebrate even today after what I have seen in Bengal and Calcutta,” said Kalyanam. He said the general impression is that Mahatma Gandhi was in Naokhali, a province deep inside Bengal on the day India gained independence. “It is not correct. Mahatma Gandhi and his entourage including me had left for Bengal immediately after the breaking out of riots in Calcutta on August 16, 1946, following the Direct Action Day call issued by Mohammed Ali Jinnah. The majority Muslim community launched a pogrom by butchering the Hindus which even the Police or Army could not control. The then chief minister of Bengal Huseyn Shaheed Suhrawardy (he was designated as Bengal Prime Minister) had given orders to cleanse Bengal of all Hindus.

The rioters went on a frenzy and killed all the Hindus whom they could lay their hands on. It was Mahatma Gandhi’s pleadings with them which brought the rioting under control,” he said. According to Kalyanam, more than 10,000 persons were butchered and the majority of them were Hindus. “Both Jinnah and Suhrawardy were Islamic fanatics and wanted the Hindus to be killed. They did nothing to stop the rioting. This part of the history will never be written, Had the victims been Muslims, our historians and liberals would have churned out thousands of books by this time,” said a visibly upset Kalyanam.

Gandhi was totally against the concept of dividing India into two nations.

By early January 1947, Gandhiji and his team had reached Calcutta. “Mahatma went on a padayatra all over Calcutta pleading with the Muslims not to kill their Hindu brethren while requesting the Hindus to be restraint in their reactions. He told the community leaders not to avenge the killings but love and help each other,” reminiscences Kalyanam.

Kalyanam3.jpg

Fig 1.Venkatram Kalyanam, the last Private Secretary of Mahatma Gandhi
He said though Jawaharlal Nehru had asked Gandhiji to return to New Delhi in time for the so called transfer of power, the latter had bluntly denied the invitation. “To me, peace between Hindus and Muslims is more important than the declaration of independence,” Gandhi who was staying at Beliaghata, a suburb 5 km away from Calcutta, told Nehru. Gandhi was totally against the concept of dividing India into two nations. “He was for a united India but Nehru and Jinnah had their own agenda,” said Kalyanam.

Gandhi was successful in restoring peace and normalcy in Bengal. Lord Mountbatten thanked him profusely for the bold act and described Gandhi as a one-man boundary force. “Even if we had sent the para-military forces or the Army, we would not have been able to bring the riots under control. But you were able to do that and I salute you for that achievement,” Mountbatten said in a letter he wrote to Gandhi.

Kalyanam is a treasure house of hitherto unpublished and unreleased information related to India’s freedom struggle. When asked why he was not writing a memoir about his days with the Mahatma, he said in his characteristic style that he is “too small a fry” to venture out for such a mission. “See, I am a small person. My predecessors were Pyarelal and Mahadeo Desai. It was only after their passing away that I was appointed as Mahatma’s private secretary. How can I do something which has not been done by Pyarelal and Desai? They were real Titans who even used to advise the Mahatma,” said Kalyanam.

The name of the person who married Indira was Feroz Ghandy. “How he became Gandhi is a mystery. Mahatma Gandhi had no role in the affair.

Having closely interacted with Jinnah and Suhrawardy, Kalyanam is of the view that both of them were Islamic fundamentalists and Hindu baiters. Kalyanam was the one who took down the Mahatma’s dictation asking for disbanding the Congress party. “Gandhiji had strong reasons for such a demand. The Congress was launched to agitate for Indian independence. It had no other missions. The party could mobilize the countrymen and draw the support of the whole country only because of the cause for which it was fighting. Once the country became free from the Colonial rule, the purpose of Congress too was over. What Gandhi asked the leaders was to disband the organization and set up a Lok Sevak Samithi towards working for the welfare of the whole countrymen,” said Kalyanam.

But the Congress leaders did not heed the suggestion or demand made by Gandhi. “What happened was that under the Congress rule corruption became rampant. I am happy that the government under Narendra Modi is doing well. Modi is proceeding in the right direction,” pointed out Kalyanam.

The current Gandhis are really Ghandys
Kalyanam who turns 95 on this Tuesday (August 15) is disappointed that the new generation does not know much about Mahatma Gandhi. The Gandhis they know are Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, and Priyanka Gandhi. Even the middle aged people are of the wrong impression that Mahatma Gandhi had adopted Indira Gandhi and hence the name,” he said. The name of the person who married Indira was Feroz Ghandy. “How he became Gandhi is a mystery. Mahatma Gandhi had no role in the affair. It could have been done by Feroz with some ulterior motives and see for yourself the damage it has done to the Mahatma’s name,” pointed out Kalyanam.

Please read up on Parsi surnames and how and why they came into being.

Try not to get this ID banned also while you are at it.

Cheers, Doc
 
Please read up on Parsi surnames and how and why they came into being.

Try not to get this ID banned also while you are at it.

Cheers, Doc

Not interested.

Do you know what people say about unsolicited advice ?
 
Not interested.

Do you know what people say about unsolicited advice ?

Parsi surnames were Indianized addoptions to comply with British rules.

Their original surnames, beyond the past 300-400 years, were the authentic Persian ones.

As such, surnames keep changing to this day. Either in spelling, or totally (father to son).

As such then, Ghandy to Gandhi is really no big deal.

Cheers, Doc
 
Parsi surnames were Indianized addoptions to comply with British rules.

Their original surnames, beyond the past 300-400 years, were the authentic Persian ones.

As such, surnames keep changing to this day. Either in spelling, or totally (father to son).

As such then, Ghandy to Gandhi is really no big deal.

Cheers, Doc

Provide proof for any of your claims.
 
“...if we heard one murder has taken place we committed ten more... the ratio should be one to ten, that was the order to my boys,” said Gopal Pantha."

“‘One murder would fetch ten rupees and a wounding would bring five”, said Jugal Chandra Ghosh to his boys.

Yep Hindu Gandhi all good Muslim Jinnah all bad .........
 
“...if we heard one murder has taken place we committed ten more... the ratio should be one to ten, that was the order to my boys,” said Gopal Pantha."

“‘One murder would fetch ten rupees and a wounding would bring five”, said Jugal Chandra Ghosh to his boys.

Yep Hindu Gandhi all good Muslim Jinnah all bad .........

Cool story. Any links to who this "jugal ghosh and Gopal pantha" are ?

Meanwhile Jinnah's Direction Action day effects,

DHWUDblV0AAkYZ9.jpg



October 11 1946, Sufi Sarwar's hundreds of jihadi pirs attacked the house of Noakhali bar association president Rajendralal Roychoudhari.


Sufi Sarwar Husseini, whose family dargah even Hindus visited,was the worst offender. His sufi "fauj" killed thousands,

CmU5RukUkAAgVmi.jpg:large


On October 11 1946, on directions by Sufi Sarwar, hundreds of jihadi pirs attacked the house of Noakhali bar association president Rajendralal Roychoudhari.


CmU72V_VYAAgRWJ.jpg


Rajendralal Roychudhari,who claimed descent from Pala kings,bravely fought the Sufi mob all day only with a single rifle.

Next day, Rajendra lal's house was burnt. All 22 family members were killed, his two daughters gangraped/abducted.

CmU8yg7UMAA7pY_.jpg


Following the Sufi Islamic practice, the severed head of Rajendralal roychoudhari was server on a platter and brought to Sufi Sarwar.
 
Cool story. Any links to who this "jugal ghosh and Gopal pantha" are ?


You think you have the access to internet only? You will post an absurd 90 year old's statements who by the way won't be able to clean his own poop in this age, some famine struck dead images and declare Hindu Gandhi all good and Muslim Jinnah all bad. Sorry everyone here has access to internet and they can do some neutral research on this themselves.

"Among those who surrendered arms was a local Congress dada in Beleghata named Jugal Chandra Ghosh. In 1946, he had organised the killings in the locality, raising funds from businessmen and doling out 10 rupees for each murder, 5 rupees for a “half murder”, as he later put it."
 
You think you have the access to internet only? You will post an absurd 90 year old's statements who by the way won't be able to clean his own poop in this age, some famine struck dead images and declare Hindu Gandhi all good and Muslim Jinnah all bad. Sorry everyone here has access to internet and they can do some neutral research on this themselves.

"Among those who surrendered arms was a local Congress dada in Beleghata named Jugal Chandra Ghosh. In 1946, he had organised the killings in the locality, raising funds from businessmen and doling out 10 rupees for each murder, 5 rupees for a “half murder”, as he later put it."


Like I said, provide proof of your claim. Where is the Link ? Who is this Jugal ghosh ?

He know better than you kiddo , he is a Parsi himself.

I am sure he appreciates you pimping for him, but both your and his claims are worthless. Better provide a proof with Links.

If you can't, better shut up rather than beg for acceptance for unsubstantiated claims.
 
Cool story. Any links to who this "jugal ghosh and Gopal pantha" are ?

Gopal Pantha was a Bengali Hindu who gave it back as good as Hindus received in Bengal during partition. Reactive not proactive though.
 
who is this Sathiyaya hua Budha??:lol::lol: anotehr joker of indain cheap media to spread hatrate what a shame......the whole world respect Jinnah for his intelligence and work for peace and non violent struggle......really cheap of this indians as expected :disagree:
 
Back
Top Bottom