What's new

Looking back: The first Parliament attack took place in 1966 – and was carried out by gau rakshaks

The_Showstopper

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Mar 6, 2011
Messages
6,708
Reaction score
-3
Country
India
Location
India
Looking back: The first Parliament attack took place in 1966 – and was carried out by gau rakshaks
The attack provided a significant fillip to the use of cow protection in Indian politics.

article-tnfwbegtws-1456213836.jpeg

Image credit: Twitter


Everyone knows about the 2001 Parliament attack, where nine Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed militants stormed New Delhi’s British-built Sansad Bhawan only to be challenged and killed by the Delhi Police as well as Parliament Security Services personnel.

What is less known is that this was actually the second attempted attack on the Indian Parliament. In 1966, while Indira Gandhi was Prime Minister, a mob – led by a troupe of naked Naga sadhus – attempted to storm Sansad Bhawan, demanding that the Union government impose a national ban on cow slaughter. In the ensuing bedlam, the protestors killed one policeman, while police firing left seven gau rakshaks dead.

Indira Gandhi, then a political greenhorn, didn’t flinch either, refusing to ban cow slaughter – a position that even Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party government has stuck to even after more than two years in office.

Bovopolitik
Cows have been a fact of Indian politics for some time now. Mohandas Gandhi made cow protection a key part of his politics. In his book, Hind Swaraj, Gandhi wrote that he would approach his “Mohammedan brother and urge him for the sake of the country to join me in protecting her [the cow]”. In 1927, he would ask Dalits to give up “serious defects” such as eating beef since “cow protection is the outward form of Hinduism”.

While Gandhi would refuse to ask for legislation banning cow slaughter, typically asking instead to change hearts and minds, his introduction of cow protection as a political tool set an unfortunate precedent. After Independence, in the Constituent Assembly, many Congressmen would call for a fundamental right on cow protection and it was only some skilful manoeuvring by BR Ambedkar which ensured that cow protection only remained a (non-justiciable) Directive Principle.

Nevertheless, the cow was an emotive issue for many caste Hindus and the politics around it only grew. After Independence, when a group of cow protection activists met Jawaharlal Nehru, exasperated, the first prime minister asked them, “Why do you people run a campaign that I eat beef?”. In 1962, in Madhya Pradesh, the Jan Sangh, the predecessor of the current-day Bharatiya Janata Party, circulated pamphlets with drawings of Nehru slaughtering a cow with a sword. So effective was this that the Congress chief minister of Madhya Pradesh Kailash Nath Katju lost his seat to a Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh member Laxmi Narayan Pandey, who fought on a Jan Sangh ticket, in the 1962 Assembly elections.

Storming Parliament
In 1966, a committee for cow protection, the Sarvadaliya Goraksha Mahaabhiyan Samiti, called for a mass satyagraha on November 7. The committee was headed by Prabhu Dutt Brahmachari, a freedom fighter who had joined politics as a follower of Gandhi and had then become a religious guru with an ashram near Allahabad. In the 1951 General Elections, he contested against Nehru Dutt, with support from the RSS, with cow protection and opposition to the Hindu Code bills as his platform.

Supported by the Jan Sangh officially as well as some Congressmen in their personal capacity, the November 7 satyagraha managed to attract a massive crowd – some estimates go up to 700,000.

Collecting outside the houses of Parliament, the sadhus, armed with spears and trishuls, then tried unsuccessfully to storm the complex as the Delhi police stood their ground.

Electoral price
Later, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi would fire her Home Minister Gulzari Lal Nanda for allowing the sadhus to enter the Parliament complex. Doubts had been raised about Nanda’s role in the affair given his earlier views in support of banning cow slaughter.

The Congress, though, would pay electorally for this. The Jan Sangh used the 1966 Parliament attack in its election message, criticising the Congress for not only prevaricating on a national cow slaughter law but also for opening fire on gau rakshaks. The Jan Sangh increased it seats by two and a half times in the 1967 Lok Sabha election, shooting up from 14 to 35.

And while no Central law on cow slaughter was sought to be imposed, the Congress, wary of the religious passions this could incite, went on to enact gau raksha or cow protection laws in various states. Later, the Jan Sangh’s successor the Bharatiya Janata Party would make these laws even more stringent.

In Madhya Pradesh, a law passed by the BJP government is so draconian, that accused under it are to be presumed guilty till they can prove themselves innocent – overturning one of the fundamental principles of criminal law. And finally, in the 2014 Lok Sabha election campaign, soon-to-be prime minister Narendra Modi would himself campaign on a platform of cow protection, accusing the Congress of furthering a “pink revolution” – a secret programme to slaughter India’s bovines for profit.


https://scroll.in/article/814368/di...e-in-1966-and-was-carried-out-by-gau-rakshaks

Note: This is on old article but was never posted.
 

Extract from Gulzarilal Nanda: A Life in the Service of the People


2515818231_812c0c8dd4_o.jpg



Being a devout Hindu, Gulzarilal Nanda had strong views on cow slaughter. Some states had done away with it, but not all. Nanda raised the proposal to ban cow slaughter with various chief ministers. For the protection of the cow, Nanda felt that if the breed of cow could be improved and it gave larger quantities of milk, then the cow's owner should not mind giving it protection after it went dry during the last part of its life. There were quite a few people who felt strongly about banning cow slaughter. In a note some months after an agitation against cow slaughter started Nanda gave the following details:

'In Parliament there was keen interest which increased as the movement (against cow slaughter) developed. At one stage, more than 100 members of Parliament signed a statement in support of the agitation and the ban on cow slaughter and submitted it to the prime minister. A number of members of Parliament approached me frequently to expedite our action. They were all sympathetic to the purpose of the agitation. The matter came up for consideration in the executive committee of the parliamentary party more than once. At the meeting a resolution was adopted which favoured a complete ban throughout the country.

'Meanwhile, the matter was taken before the working committee. I was asked by the committee to deal with the matter in Parliament and make a statement. I told the committee that this was not my subject and therefore I was not prepared to make a statement. Moreover, I had certain strong views on the subject and therefore I was likely to go beyond what might be intended by the other. They insisted that I should handle it, but even then I refused. The decision was that whatever the Constitution permitted should be enforced in the other states also which has so far no legislation for the purpose.

'Knowing that some of the chief ministers had expressed their disinclination it was decided that these chief ministers might be called immediately by the prime minister and persuaded to accept the line adopted in the working committee. In terms of that decision I made a statement in Parliament on 4th November, 1966. There was a great deal of applause and general satisfaction expressed in relation to that statement.

'The period between the 4th and 7th of November, 1966, naturally is of crucial importance in this context. It was expected that the prime minister would call the chief ministers for consultation and secure their consent. I reminded her also once or twice but it appears that they failed to carry out this obligation. If this part of the assignment had been carried out on the lines recommended by the working committee, the incidents of 7th November might will have been avoided. In fact, the Goraksha Samiti people told me that if I were to succeed in the efforts I was making there need not be any procession but there would be a thanksgiving meeting.

'On the 6th November, I summoned the meeting of the officers concerned at my residence to discuss the whole situation and the arrangements to be made in connection with the procession which had been announced. At that meeting, the lieutenant governor was present. Also the home secretary, officers of the Delhi administration, the inspector general of police and top personnel of the Intelligence Bureau were also present. It took us two hours to go through the business of this meeting. I asked all sorts of questions in connection with the arrangements and enquired about the route, whether it was a safe route. The answer given was that those responsible for the procession had agreed to such changes of the route as asked for.

'I had asked whether there was adequate police. I enquired whether they had made effective arrangements to prevent any persons coming too close to Parliament's precincts; whether any additional barriers needed to be placed. I also enquired as to how much reserve police they had got after making arrangements for their disposition at the time of the procession and at the end I asked them whether there was any information from any source about any element of mischief, or any trouble that might be apprehended in connection with the procession. They told me repeatedly that everything was normal, that they had no information at all of any kind of trouble developing on that date.

'On the 7th, I was naturally anxious to be in touch with what was happening but I was not able to get any regular reports. There were occasional telephone calls here and there. It appeared that the communication system just did not work properly. When I came to know that some trouble had arisen. I was naturally very anxious to get more precise information but it came only in very small bits.

'When I went to Parliament in the early afternoon, I went up to the northern gate of Parliament House across which the procession was held up. Before that I had seen smoke rising in the sky. I was told that it was occasioned by tear gas shells. I had some information that earlier some persons from outside had started smashing some doors of business houses and shops and were creating mischief. I intended to go into the crowd myself, but I was prevented to do so. I peered into the scene through the iron gate. I saw some Naga Sadhus shouting and moving up and down but there was nothing very serious at that point.

I came back to my office in Parliament House and received reports about arson and some firing and some deaths. There was a hurried meeting of some members of the Cabinet and after consultations I prepared a statement for the Lok Sabha. I read this out at the end of the day's business. My mind was full of the situation as naturally other people had expressed their sense of sorrow about the happenings. At the end, the prime minister asked me whether I would like to say something. I declined.

'When she left, I followed her to her office and told her that in view of what had transpired in the committee, I did not think I would be able to carry on with my duties although I do not think that the home minister can be blamed for what had happened and there was no failure of responsibility on the part of the ministry. She then told me that I should not do anything in haste and that she would like to consider the matter the next day.'

Nanda was dropped as home minister. Being an honest man himself and keen on anti-corruption measures, he evidently made quite a few enemies in the Congress party and the government. Quite a few of them were worried how they would be able to fight any elections in the future if they were prevented from raising funds from various sources.

Some people evidently allowed mischief makers, even perhaps goonda elements to become part of the procession consisting mainly of sadhus. These elements forced their way into the precincts of Parliament House. The police naturally took action. Also, it appears, some of the mischievous elements even forced their way into the house of the Congress president. The whole matter appears to have been engineered. Nanda's enemies won the day.

It was in the guise of sadhus that some mischief-makers were able to bring about violence which ultimately created a problem for the home ministry which Nanda had to leave.


The question is sometimes asked why was he so enamored of sadhus?

Nanda believed that real sadhus could help put people on the right path. The corrupt, for instance, could be punished but what was required was that corruption should be prevented and that could only happen by reforming the wrongdoers. His own association with the godly gave him strength. He wrote in a letter to a friend 'I believe in the efficacy of prayers as in instrument of personal transformation and a source of help to others in the same terms. To be near Anandmai (Anandamayee Ma), ever for a short while is a privilege of a high order. Divine grace gave me the opportunity of living and breathing for a period of eleven days in the blessed atmosphere around her at Dehradun. I have come back enriched and fortified.' The letter is dated July 16, 1976, around ten years after he stepped out of the home ministry.


1966-goraksha-maha-abhiyan-delhi.png


http://economictimes.indiatimes.com...ion-of-cow-slaughter/articleshow/53625124.cms

.......
police fired 209 rounds with muskets on a rampaging procession of over one lakh anti-cow slaughter demonstrators in front of Parliament House," the next day's Times of India had reported on the front page.


..
He told ET that actually more than 200 people were killed in the police firing and the incident is still raw in the memory of sadhus.

The agitation Rally of 7th Nov 1966 was started from the Arya Samaj Temple at Chandni Chowk under the leadership of Swami Karpartri Ji Majaraj under the banner of “Gauraksha Mahaabhiyan Samiti”. An unified mass comprising the Sanatani, Arya Samaji, Hindu, Bauhhist, Jain, Sikh, Nath, Nirankari all started march towards Parliament of India (Samsad Bhawan) keeping prominent and most revered saints like Shankaracharyas of Jagannath Puri Govardhan Math and Dwaraka Jotishpeeth, the seven Peethadishes of Vallabh Sampradaya, Ramanuja Sampradaya Peethadhipati, Ramananda Sampradaya Peethadhipati, Mahant of Gorakhpeeth, Saints President and Secretary of Arya Samaj and Granthis of various Sikh shrines.

It is reported that approx 10 lakh people including 20 thousand women participated in that rally on 7th Nov 1966 in Delhi.




PS:
I have heard from a nonagenarian saint who participated in 1966 Save Cow Movement in Delhi, now living in Haridwar that Srimad Hariharananda Swami, widely known as Karapatriji Maharaj cursed Indira Gandhi for getting a same fate for a massive Hindu killing by brutal firing.

Indira was killed by brutal firing by her bodyguards in 1984 and Rajiv Gandhi was killed by LTTE suicide squad in 1991.
 
Says someone who supports "leaders" and ideology who/which speaks of cows on a daily basis;)

Nonsense ; it is only Your side which is raising these Cow ; cow ;cow issues
all the time

By the way ; Nitish has destroyed all your hopes of an opposition unity

Now who will you Project -- Rahul or Laloo
 
What is the need to bottle the "gau raksha" genie ? :coffee:

The need to to make Laws to ensure "gau raksha" so that vigilantes do not have much of a role.


When the LAW comes to Gotham, Batman becomes Bruce Wayne.


Or let's put it this way, when the devil comes to Delhi the RSS scums become Cowman.
 
can anyone from india put the news about another Muskim is killed by al-cowda for carrying beef today
 
Classic case of Kill thousands of Hindus and then brand them as terrorists to justify the genocide.

Similar thing was done in 1984 against Sikhs. First the Muslim backed Congress Killed thousands of Sikhs and then blamed them.

The Congress repeated the same thing using Muslims in 2002. Burnt a train full of Hindu woman & children and then blamed Hindus.

Who can forget the largest genocide of Hindus in Independent India in Kashmir? The muslims backed by Islamic Congress has been killing by thousands officially.

The repeated genocide of Hindus & then twisting to make them as perpetrators might have worked 20 years back. NOW, we know the truth and you lot are done for.

Only parties that will come to power are the ones that will lick the feet of Hindus. We don't care if it's BJP or some other party. As long as you lick our feet and stay as our loyal dogs, we will vote for you.
 
Back
Top Bottom