What's new

Looking back at Xi's diplomacy

TaiShang

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 30, 2014
Messages
27,848
Reaction score
70
Country
China
Location
Taiwan, Province Of China
Looking back at Xi's diplomacy


U542P886T1D147596F12DT20141222105052.JPG

FORGING AHEAD: Chinese President Xi Jinping (fourth right) and his wife Peng Liyuan (third right) along with foreign leaders, attend a welcoming banquet for the 22nd Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Economic Leaders' Meeting in Beijing November 10 (LAN HONGGUANG)


Commanding the world's second largest economy is an arduous task, as Chinese President Xi Jinping knows well. China commenced its broadest reform in more than 30 years in 2014, leaving Xi with an active domestic agenda. In addition to efforts within the mainland, the Chinese leader has spent nearly a quarter of his time raising China's international profile.

This year, Xi made seven overseas trips that took him to 18 countries spanning five continents, where he attended a string of international meetings including the Nuclear Security Summit, G20 Summit, Summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and BRICS Summit. Within China, Xi has not only frequently met with visiting foreign leaders but also presided over two important international conferences—respectively the Fourth Summit of the Conference on Interaction and Confidence-Building Measures in Asia in May and the 22nd Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Leaders' Meeting in November.

Through this series of moves, Xi's diplomatic style is emerging as a more enterprising Chinese strategy becomes more readily apparent to the rest of the world.

Pursuing targets

The main theme of Xi's diplomacy has focused on fostering a more enabling international environment for China's development. Through this focus, he stresses the realization of the "Chinese dream"—the great renewal of the Chinese nation—as well as the "two centenary goals." The goals, formally put forth at the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China in November 2012, aim to double the 2010 GDP and per-capita income of urban and rural residents and finish the building of a moderately prosperous society in all respects when the Party celebrates its centenary in 2021. The goal is to turn China into a modern socialist country that is prosperous, strong, democratic, culturally advanced and harmonious when the People's Republic celebrates its centenary in 2049.

In April, when presiding over the first meeting of the National Security Commission, Xi proposed a comprehensive national security outlook, touching on politics, territory, military affairs, the economy and natural resources. He stressed diplomacy as a key component of the strategy, noting its function of serving domestic reform and safeguarding national security.

In line with the domestic anti-corruption agenda, the Chinese Government has notably expanded judicial cooperation with other countries. Thus far, the country has established an initial network and platform for chasing fugitives overseas and recovering stolen funds through bilateral treaties, multilateral treaties and law-enforcement cooperation mechanisms. Up to the end of 2014, China has concluded 39 extradition treaties with other countries and 52 mutual legal assistance treaties. China has also actively participated in the negotiation and implementation of the UN Convention Against Corruption. As one of the major achievements of the 2014 APEC Economic Leaders' Week, APEC members agreed to set up a cross-border law enforcement network to strengthen transnational anti-corruption cooperation in the region.

Xi's diplomacy has proven to be a more active and flexible strategy in dealing with territorial disputes with neighboring countries. On the one hand, China strengthens patrolling and law enforcement in its territorial waters and exclusive economic zones to deter the provocations of Japan, Viet Nam and the Philippines. It also resists US intervention in the East and South China Sea issues. These efforts are effective ways of safeguarding China's core national interests. On the other hand, China adheres to the principle of settling disputes through dialogue and peaceful negotiation, maintaining cooperation as the main stream of China's neighborhood diplomacy.

The once strained China-Japan relations thawed somewhat with the meeting between Xi and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe during the APEC Leaders' Meeting in Beijing. The Japanese side euphemistically acknowledged disputes between the two countries over the Diaoyu Islands in the East China Sea. Abe also stressed that the current Japanese administration will maintain the same views as those held by previous governments regarding Japan's aggressive history in World War II (WWII). The two sides now have begun negotiations on the establishment of a maritime crisis management mechanism.

At the Ninth East Asia Summit held in Myanmar in November, Chinese Premier Li Keqiang officially proposed a new approach for solving territorial disputes in the South China Sea between China and some member states of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). China and ASEAN members have agreed to a dual-track approach for dealing with the issue, according to which specific disputes are to be solved through negotiations and consultations by countries directly concerned. Peace and stability in the region will be jointly upheld by China and ASEAN countries working together. "China and ASEAN agreed to actively carry out consultation to reach, on the basis of consensus and at an early date, a code of conduct in the South China Sea, for which an early harvest has been achieved," the Chinese premier announced.

The presentation of the dual-track approach marks a subtle adjustment of China's tactics, changing from a refusal to discuss the issue at any multilateral occasions to accepting its necessity.

Changing the tune

Xi took power at a time of profound and complex changes in the interactions between China and the world. The international community is concerned with the nature of China's growing global presence and whether it will seek hegemony in Asia and challenge the international pattern that has been dominated by the West since the end of WWII. Xi seemingly has already given a clear answer. In a November speech at the Federal Parliament of Australia in Canberra, Xi noted a durable truth when he said that despite its large size, China's forefathers over 2,000 years ago realized that a warlike country, however big it might be, is bound to collapse. Xi vowed that China will remain unshakable in its resolve to pursue peaceful and common development, and will continue to follow a win-win strategy of opening up.

At the Central Conference on Work Relating to Foreign Affairs held from November 28 to 29 in Beijing, Xi called for the development of a distinctive diplomatic approach befitting China's status as a major country. "We should, on the basis of summing up our past practice and experience, enrich and further develop our diplomatic perceptions as well as conduct diplomacy with a salient Chinese character and a Chinese vision," he said.

The outside world paid close attention to Xi's speech. Some observers claim that the conference sent a message that China is giving up the late Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping's diplomatic stance of "keeping a low profile," while some others believe it is a kind of policy of mollification to the international community. These views are narrow and one-sided. China is dedicated to development under the current international system. In the meantime, it is becoming more active and confident in participating in international affairs. China strives to international situation instead of following the beaten path. China is in fact making efforts to incorporate its own progress much more closely with the world's development.

The resurgence of populism is one of the major features of the international situation in 2014. China's peaceful development strategy is also challenged by sentiments of ultra-nationalism and military adventurism at home. But Xi has determined to resist such distracting forces and kept a clear mind.

Adjusted scenarios

While focusing on Asia, Xi's diplomacy presents a trend of building strategic partnerships widely with both the East and the West, paving the way for China's status as a major country in the world.

Xi's diplomacy places particular emphasis on neighboring countries. His 2014 visits included trips to Russia, Mongolia and South Korea, respectively. When hosting the APEC Economic Leaders' Meeting, China also invited leaders of neighboring countries that are non-APEC members including Mongolia, Tajikistan, Pakistan, Myanmar, Cambodia, Laos and Bangladesh to Beijing for the dialogue devoted to strengthening interconnectivity partnerships.

Under Xi's leadership, China's diplomatic approach has moved away from overemphasizing stable China-US relations to focusing on more balanced relations with major players in the international community. While exploring ways to build a new type of major-country relations with the United States featuring no conflict and no confrontation, China also actively deepens its strategic partnership with Russia, the EU and India, promoting the trend of multi-polarization. On the Ukraine crisis, China refuses to pick sides. It neither participates in the Western sanctions against Russia, nor does it join hands with Russia to confront with the West. Rather, it works to promote the settlement of the crisis through political dialogue.

Though China-US relations have seen ups and downs in the past year due to friction over trade, human rights, cyber security, the South China Sea and Hong Kong issues, their overall bilateral ties have maintained positive momentum.

In November, US President Barack Obama paid his second visit to China since taking office. Xi and Obama had in-depth talks, during which they reiterated the consensus on building a new type of major-country relations between the world's two largest economies. The two countries also agreed to enhance cooperation on a wide range of topics including climate change, investment and military exchanges.

However, within the United States there exists growing anxiety toward China's rapid development within the United States. Despite Obama's frequent reiteration that the United States welcomes a peaceful and prosperous China and has no intention of containing China, his administration acts as though they view China as a major competitor and insists on the advancement of its pivot-to-Asia strategy featuring military deployment in the Asia-Pacific region surrounding China. Thus, China-US relations have many challenges remaining in the future.

U542P886T1D147598F12DT20141222104942.jpg

Sharing profits

On August 8, in an interview with The New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman, Obama claimed that China had been a free rider for 30 years, and that no one expected China to play the role. Half a month later, when visiting Mongolia, Xi seemingly gave an indirect response to the US accusation. During his address at the Mongolian parliament on August 22, Xi said, "China is willing to offer opportunities and room to Mongolia and other neighbors for common development. You can take a ride on our express train or simply hitchhike. All are welcome."

In fact, China not only sincerely welcomes its neighbors to share the fruits of its development but has also taken many concrete measures already. For example, it has tirelessly promoted the building of the Silk Road Economic Belt and the 21st-Century Maritime Silk Road that encompass a large number of Asian, European and African economies.

China has also announced a $40-billion Silk Road Fund to improve infrastructure in Asia. The "One Belt and One Road" initiatives both focus on Asian countries. Through them, China aims to build a "community of destiny" together with its neighbors by strengthening interconnectivity to provide these countries with more public goods.

In the meantime, China has also committed to a $50-billion investment of funds in the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank in addition to a $41-billion contribution to the $100-billion emergency reserve fund to be launched by BRICS countries—Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa.

Another major move China takes in 2014 is expanding regional trade liberalization. In the past year, China substantially concluded bilateral free trade agreement (FTA) negotiations with South Korea and Australia, respectively. It has also sped up the negotiations on an upgraded China-ASEAN FTA and the Comprehensive Economic Partnership in East Asia.

At the foreign affairs meeting in November, Xi urged China's diplomatic service to give full consideration to both domestic and international markets, both domestic and foreign resources as well as both domestic and international rules; to act in good faith and uphold justice; and to promote a new type of international relations featuring mutually beneficial cooperation.

The year of 2014 saw the ushering in of China's new diplomacy, yet the road ahead could be full of uncertainties. Will the "One Belt and One Road" initiatives come out of the geopolitical shadow? Can the Asia-Pacific free trade blueprint proposed by China be compatible with the US-dominated Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement? Will the West put more pressure on China using human rights as an excuse? And can China-US relations and China-Japan relations see more improvement in the future? Xi's leadership must confront all of these challenges step by step.
 
The Xi Jinping Doctrine of Chinese Diplomacy | CHINA US Focus

Keywords : Chinese Dream, Major Country Relations, Xi Jinping

President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Keqiang have been in office for one year. Their concepts and practices of diplomacy have shaken the world. Both Premier Li in his Report on the Work of the Government and Foreign Minister Wang Yi discussed these concepts and practices. But it is still necessary to have a systematic interim assessment from the policy research perspective.

Philosophically, while maintaining the stability and continuity of foreign policy, Xi has also put forward a series of new concepts, which may be termed “Xi Jinping Doctrine” of Chinese diplomacy. These are designed to explain the new leadership’s view on the relationship between China and the world and to lay out new approaches towards major issues or difficulties in that relationship. The doctrine now roughly contains six points. The first is to establish a sense of identity with the world in a “community of common destiny”. No matter how high China rises and no matter what system or development mode it adopts, it is always part of that community rather than being detached from the rest of the world. The second is to express a world dream with a “Chinese dream”. The ideal of a “harmonious world” of the last leadership might be too high and faraway to reach. And the new leadership chooses a more simple, direct, popular and clear way to talk to the world: you have your American dream, African dream, Latin American dream, etc. and I have my Chinese dream. We hope that all our dreams will come true and all of us will enjoy peace, development and prosperity. The third is to ensure peace and development with bottom-line thinking. Peace and development are not achieved without conditions and Chinese core interests of security, development and sovereignty brook no violation, just as NPC spokeswoman Fu Ying asked, in response to a question from an American journalist, “shall we have peace if we have a weak defense force?” The fourth is to improve China’s image as valuing profits more than justice with a right approach to morality and interests. Without moral guidance, how can China talk about the morality of a big developing country? The fifth is to manage relations with the US towards a new model of big country relationship, with the lowest objective of having no confrontation or conflict, medium objective of mutual respect, and the highest objective of cooperation and win-win. All three objectives can be pursued in parallel. The sixth point is to dispel misgivings of neighboring countries with the principles of amity, sincerity, mutual benefit and inclusiveness. China will practice these principles and hope other countries will also do so to make them a common philosophy in this region.

In practice, the past year’s diplomatic actions have been largely consistent with the above-mentioned concepts. Similar to the approaches to domestic administration, efforts have been made to strengthen both top-level design and actual implementation in diplomatic work. The six concepts described above are important components of the top-level design. The conference on diplomatic work with neighboring countries held on October 24, 2013 actually announced Chinese strategy towards its neighborhood in the coming five to ten years, which stresses common development with higher aims and harder work as well as creation of a sound surrounding environment for the realization of the two centennial goals. In his visits to Central Asia and Southeast Asia, Xi envisioned the Silk Road economic belt and maritime silk road of the 21st century. Li has also proposed various economic corridors, free trade areas and connectivity projects. These are considered the mega-strategy of Xi and Li. In implementation, as Foreign Minister Wang said, “last year, the most distinctive feature of China’s diplomacy is being very proactive.” The proactivity is demonstrated in three aspects. First, attention was given to coordination and alignment between the central government, different line ministries and local authorities while preparations were made for the establishment of the National Security Commission. Second, various means were used in a comprehensive and integrated way. For example, the “five connections” for the Silk Road economic belt – policy exchange, road network, trade talks, currency circulation and people’s friendship – involve political, trade, financial, legal and non-governmental approaches. Third, strength and gentleness are combined on major hot-spot issues and questions related to China’s rights and interests. China adopts an attitude of not evading questions, welcoming political negotiation, acting in accordance with international and regional rules while making necessary military preparations and taking necessary tough measures for effective deterrence and control. In other words, it wants both Chinese prestige and Chinese rules. The latter refers to China’s move to make its own rules on the basis of international customs, such as the East China Sea air defense identification zone. The phenomenon is quite new and has caused much debate.

With their special experiences, the new leadership has a very strong sense of mission, a focus on efficiency and hard work, no shortage of risk awareness, and little fear of dangers or difficulties. Naturally, they tend to act proactively and seek steady progress on diplomatic fronts, with higher Chinese voices and rational use of Chinese power, in order to effectively safeguard Chinese interests and maximize Chinese contribution. In 2014, they will continue advancing their new diplomatic concepts and initiatives in line with international expectations. However, attention should also be given to possible reactions. In the post-Cold War and post-financial crisis age, the world’s complexity and uncertainty are beyond imagination. Countries with their own interest considerations will have their own paces and rhythms rather than dancing with China. For example, some countries may, for the time being, find it difficult to understand the new concepts, initiatives or actions of China; some may misunderstand or even resist them; and some may even deliberately distort or disrupt them.

As the proverb says, more haste and less speed. It is extremely difficult for the new leaders to make correct situational judgments and balance the timing, strength and rhythm of decision-making and implementation in a dynamic and smart way. Diplomacy is an art of experience and skills are gained through long-term practice. There is much to expect in this regard.
 
In a November speech at the Federal Parliament of Australia in Canberra, Xi noted a durable truth when he said that despite its large size, China's forefathers over 2,000 years ago realized that a warlike country, however big it might be, is bound to collapse. Xi vowed that China will remain unshakable in its resolve to pursue peaceful and common development, and will continue to follow a win-win strategy of opening up.

Sadly the actions are not in line with the words spoken, ending up making the words sound hollow.
 
Sadly the actions are not in line with the words spoken, ending up making the words sound hollow.
name a war we been involved in. We may pursue peaceful means, but we are not monks.

What you see as peaceful isn't peaceful, it's submitting. Whether you like to admit it or not, China is 4 times India's size, if India were to do what you are suggesting for China to someone of similar standing, would you be cool with it?
 
Although I thought Hu Jintao was reasonably competent, looking back it's obvious that his diplomacy was not up to snuff, especially when compared to Xi Jinping's globetrotting. This administration has made connectivity and integration a foremost priority, and is binding the world closer to China through not only robust economic relations, but also cultural, social, and scientific ties/exchanges.

Sadly the actions are not in line with the words spoken, ending up making the words sound hollow.

Hard for any reasonable observer to agree with you. China hasn't been in a war for over 30 years, and in all diplomatic efforts, stresses the need for peaceful development and win-win exchanges. You might take issue with China's firm, uncompromising stance on preserving its territorial integrity, but as far as I can see, every country guards their own territory zealously. Some, being artificial entities stitched together by their colonial overlords, will even "guard" the territories of others that were seized during colonial expansion and have not yet been returned. :agree::nono:
 
name a war we been involved in. We may pursue peaceful means, but we are not monks.

What you see as peaceful isn't peaceful, it's submitting. Whether you like to admit it or not, China is 4 times India's size, if India were to do what you are suggesting for China to someone of similar standing, would you be cool with it?

What the size or strength of your opponent has to do with your 'peacefulness'? You can only claim to be 'peaceful' when you are peaceful with your weaker neighbours, otherwise every country tend to remain peaceful with stronger neighbours. Since you dragged in India here; you might want to look at how we have settled our marine boundary disputes with Bangladesh in international court.

Sadly the extent of 'peacefulness' is inversely proportional to the strength of the opponent in Chinese books.
 
What the size or strength of your opponent has to do with your 'peacefulness'? You can only claim to be 'peaceful' when you are peaceful with your weaker neighbours, otherwise every country tend to remain peaceful with stronger neighbours. Since you dragged in India here; you might want to look at how we have settled our marine boundary disputes with Bangladesh in international court.

Sadly the extent of 'peacefulness' is inversely proportional to the strength of the opponent in Chinese books.

What about Kashmir, if you want to take peaceful, we settled Kashmir peacefully with Pakistan, more so than your deal with Bangladesh, so what does that mean really.

We settled with Russia and we settled with Central Asia.

You still have a very violent dispute with Pakistan, I mean bullets and shells, while the worst attack we did was water cannon.

Why don't you take your own advice and settle peacefully than.
 
Hard for any reasonable observer to agree with you. China hasn't been in a war for over 30 years, and in all diplomatic efforts, stresses the need for peaceful development and win-win exchanges. You might take issue with China's firm, uncompromising stance on preserving its territorial integrity, but as far as I can see, every country guards their own territory zealously. Some, being artificial entities stitched together by their colonial overlords, will even "guard" the territories of others that were seized during colonial expansion and have not yet been returned. :agree::nono:

War is not the only means to show aggression and hostility, and China is showing enough hostilities towards its neighbours to raise serious doubts over its claim of 'peaceful rise', even by the 'reasonable observers'. And if thousands of years old maps of ancient kingdoms are any legitimate basis of claiming territories in modern world, then Mongolia should claim most parts of China today.
 
Xi Jinping is iron fist within velvet glove. In 2015, small scale skirmishes against our enemies in South China Sea and East China Sea are likely.
 
What about Kashmir, if you want to take peaceful, we settled Kashmir peacefully with Pakistan, more so than your deal with Bangladesh, so what does that mean really.

We settled with Russia and we settled with Central Asia.

You still have a very violent dispute with Pakistan, I mean bullets and shells, while the worst attack we did was water cannon.

Why don't you take your own advice and settle peacefully than.

We never wanted a violent future for Kashmir, in fact it was India who took the matter to UN. Unfortunately, at that time Pakistan thought that they can have Kashmir through violent means. Even today we are open to a bilateral solution with Pakistan if they stop their shadow war against us through cross-border terrorism. No country is promoting terrorism inside China, so what stops China from taking the dialogue route or international court route to resolve its border disputes?

Btw, today you are supporting Pakistan's activity in Kashmir only at the cost of having a similar situation in Xinjiang in future, supported by the same terrorists who are doing terrorist activities in Kashmir. You can bate on that.

Xi Jinping is iron fist within velvet glove. In 2015, small scale skirmishes against our enemies in South China Sea and East China Sea are likely.

And there goes your 'peaceful rise' claims. I suggest China should stop this farce then.
 
And there goes your 'peaceful rise' claims. I suggest China should stop this farce then.
Of course we are peaceful. After we nuke our enemies our Himalayan border will be at peace. We eliminate warlike countries from the planet. Such as a certain country that tries to rebuild the British Raj through aggression against neighbors.
 
Last edited:
Of course we are peaceful. After we nuke our enemies our Himalayan border will be at peace. We eliminate warlike countries from the planet. Such as a certain country that tries to rebuild the Britis Raj through aggression against neighbors.

You are only proving my point. More importantly, you are doing disservice to your country here.
 
We never wanted a violent future for Kashmir, in fact it was India who took the matter to UN. Unfortunately, at that time Pakistan thought that they can have Kashmir through violent means. Even today we are open to a bilateral solution with Pakistan if they stop their shadow war against us through cross-border terrorism. No country is promoting terrorism inside China, so what stops China from taking the dialogue route or international court route to resolve its border disputes?

Btw, today you are supporting Pakistan's activity in Kashmir only at the cost of having a similar situation in Xinjiang in future, supported by the same terrorists who are doing terrorist activities in Kashmir. You can bate on that.

We never wanted a violent China Seas, and there isn't any actual violence, in fact, we been repeatedly calling for talks. Unfortunately Philippines thinks with the US, they can muscle us out. We would be open to talks period.

The fact you think we don't want dialog really speaks volume. I'm not going to say troll, but your point of view is shaped by biased reporting, and really biased views.

For as much heat as we been getting for propaganda, it is actually propaganda that is making you view this issue the way you do.

So in every way, our disputes have been largely peaceful, and we are looking to talks. It doesn't mean we aren't making moves, but it does mean we haven't discharged any weapon.
 
You are only proving my point. More importantly, you are doing disservice to your country here.
The whole South Asia wants to take down the elephant. We served humanity when we crushed the British Raj wannabe in 1962 and more recently in 2013 and 2014 when we humiliated you at Chumar!
 
Last edited:
Although I thought Hu Jintao was reasonably competent, looking back it's obvious that his diplomacy was not up to snuff, especially when compared to Xi Jinping's globetrotting. This administration has made connectivity and integration a foremost priority, and is binding the world closer to China through not only robust economic relations, but also cultural, social, and scientific ties/exchanges.



Hard for any reasonable observer to agree with you. China hasn't been in a war for over 30 years, and in all diplomatic efforts, stresses the need for peaceful development and win-win exchanges. You might take issue with China's firm, uncompromising stance on preserving its territorial integrity, but as far as I can see, every country guards their own territory zealously. Some, being artificial entities stitched together by their colonial overlords, will even "guard" the territories of others that were seized during colonial expansion and have not yet been returned. :agree::nono:

Doesn't matter if you think We were stitched up by a Foriegn nation or not the People of the territory & the territory are ours & will continue to be ours only
If you try to launch a assault with the purpose of annexing our territory I assure you from Beijing to New Delhi everything will be turned into a radioactive pile of Dust so for yours & ours sake spare me this 'Historical Territory BS'
 
Back
Top Bottom