Kompromat
ADMINISTRATOR
- Joined
- May 3, 2009
- Messages
- 40,366
- Reaction score
- 416
- Country
- Location
Shocking documents accessed by DAWN prove the JIT's assessment in the PANAMA PAPERS case.
Dubai Papers:
These are the papers based on which the JIT launched an MLA request with the Govt of UAE. The Govt has stated that they do not have any record of the sale deed noted in these documents, additionally, they have also stated that the notarization on the papers also do not register in their system, reflecting that the notarization is also forged.
Minerva Paper:
Firstly in this document, the author at no point says that Hussain is the beneficial owner. He merely says that he remembers meeting Hussain in his brother's office in 2006. After which Minerva took over running these offshore companies on behalf of the Sharifs. The letter has already been filed in the court and is not a new document.
Furthermore more it should be noted that Minerva was stripped of their contract in 2014 for disclosing Mariam Nawaz to be beneficial owner of Nescol and Neilson.
JPCA Papers:
This document is written by JPCA, who are employed by the Sharifs as service providers for running Nescol and Neilson which state that Hussain is the beneficial owner of the companies, but JPCA only took over the companies in 2014 and thus cannot comment on whether he was the beneficial owner before this time. Furthermore, as employees of the Sharifs, their declaration does not hold up in the court of law as they stand to benefit from the Sharifs stance and hold no legal authority. Their stance has been directly contradicted by the Attorney General who has stated in the JIT report in response to an MLA request that they authenticate the letters released through the Panama Papers confirming Mariyam Nawaz to be beneficial owner of Neilson and Nescol.
Dubai Papers:
These are the papers based on which the JIT launched an MLA request with the Govt of UAE. The Govt has stated that they do not have any record of the sale deed noted in these documents, additionally, they have also stated that the notarization on the papers also do not register in their system, reflecting that the notarization is also forged.
Minerva Paper:
Firstly in this document, the author at no point says that Hussain is the beneficial owner. He merely says that he remembers meeting Hussain in his brother's office in 2006. After which Minerva took over running these offshore companies on behalf of the Sharifs. The letter has already been filed in the court and is not a new document.
Furthermore more it should be noted that Minerva was stripped of their contract in 2014 for disclosing Mariam Nawaz to be beneficial owner of Nescol and Neilson.
JPCA Papers:
This document is written by JPCA, who are employed by the Sharifs as service providers for running Nescol and Neilson which state that Hussain is the beneficial owner of the companies, but JPCA only took over the companies in 2014 and thus cannot comment on whether he was the beneficial owner before this time. Furthermore, as employees of the Sharifs, their declaration does not hold up in the court of law as they stand to benefit from the Sharifs stance and hold no legal authority. Their stance has been directly contradicted by the Attorney General who has stated in the JIT report in response to an MLA request that they authenticate the letters released through the Panama Papers confirming Mariyam Nawaz to be beneficial owner of Neilson and Nescol.
