Dash
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2009
- Messages
- 6,652
- Reaction score
- -14
- Country
- Location
yes we are operating mirages since last 45 years
Then they are junk according to your airforce.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yes we are operating mirages since last 45 years
LCA is the subject of this thread, my point was not out of the world, it was exactly to the pointA out of the world reply invites an out of the world response.
US does not give classified defence technology to ant country other than Israel. Not even NATO members are getting it. How India will get it beats me
ha ha i see it 33 years behind schedule
Pakistanis have not rejected Tejas, your Naval Chief has rejected Tejas, why dont u ask ur Naval Chief this question ?
Of course they are a relic from the past, going to be de-commissioned in next 2 years whereas your Tejas is just entering serviceThen they are junk according to your airforce.
LCA is the subject of this thread, my point was not out of the world, it was exactly to the point
Then your Navy has just divorced Tejas as per your naval ChiefIf you are referring to that article then I can't help you but can only tell you that he didn't reject Tajas but whatever Tejas is today it's because of Navy.
Of course they are a relic from the past, going to be de-commissioned in next 2 years whereas your Tejas is just entering service
Then your Navy has just divorced Tejas as per your naval Chief
with all due apology my Indian friend its the HAL braying for last 33 years. If you can stop HAL, all others will automatically stop, I mean there is a limit to delays. Your Tejas are already obsolete before launching, its nothing more than a Mirage3
cant you understand simple english ? "Navy Chief Admiral Sunil Lanba announced that the naval version of the fighter is not suitable for aircraft carrier operations, necessitating an international competition for a new range of combat aircraft."If you are referring to that article then I can't help you but can only tell you that he didn't reject Tajas but whatever Tejas is today it's because of Navy.
You dont need a beast after 33 years, it should have come 20 years backdoes all this $h!t DRDO is making make you happy or sad???
Literally,as an enemy,you should be enjoying it,right??
Or is it frustration that even with these junks India is kicking your @r$3 in every war???
Meanwhile...
UTTAM radar is Indegenous AESA which is possibly going to be used for Tejas Mk-2.
For Tejas MK-1A, I guess India will go for EL/M 2052. Its a beast.
Pakistanis have not rejected Tejas, your Naval Chief has rejected Tejas, why dont u ask ur Naval Chief this question ?
You dont need a beast after 33 years, it should have come 20 years back
cant you understand simple english ? "Navy Chief Admiral Sunil Lanba announced that the naval version of the fighter is not suitable for aircraft carrier operations, necessitating an international competition for a new range of combat aircraft."
When once cannot answer a problem with logic, he comes down on personality. I do not blame you. The fact is that out of your 1250 million Indians not even one can defend HAL's blunder.Naval tejas was a TD for navy. Navy was only interested in productionising if they went for Tejas MK2 with a heavier frame and more powerful engine.
There is nothing new the Navy chief said. The purpose of making a TD was achieved. We are happy.
Why is you arse on fire and you are jumping around on all threads telling us things about our program? Your posting skill so far suggests you should be kept away from a computer, and that vest.