What's new

Lanka asks UN to emulate India

Flintlock

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Oct 7, 2007
Messages
6,176
Reaction score
0
News Update:


PK Balachandran, Hindustan Times
Colombo, October 14, 2007
First Published: 15:40 IST(14/10/2007)
Last Updated: 16:29 IST(14/10/2007)
Lanka asks UN to emulate India

Top Sri Lankan leader, Basil Rajapaksa, had asked the visiting UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Louise Arbour, to emulate India and stop "policing" Sri Lanka, The Nation reported on Sunday.

The second most important man in Sri Lanka after President Mahinda Rajapaksa, told the ranking UN official, that India was not acting as the policeman of the South Asian region, but was helping Sri Lanka solve its problems. For example, India had sent food to tackle shortages in Jaffna, he said.

"We urge the UN to assist Sri Lanka and refrain from policing human rights in the country," he told Arbour.

Earlier, the Jathika Hela Urumaya (JHU) leader and Buddhist monk, Venerable Athuraliya Rathana Thero, told her that she should fight for animal rights too. "This is the ideology of Buddhism and the JHU," he said.

Charges Exaggerated

Sri Lanka's case, as presented by President Rajapaksa and others in the government, is that the country's primary task is to defeat the LTTE, which is described as "the world's most ruthless terrorist group", and that in conflict situations like the one in Sri Lanka, some human rights violations are only to be expected.

The government also contends that the international organizations are exaggerating the rights violations. Cabinet minister Rajitha Senaratne even said that Sri Lanka was being pilloried because it was economically weak, without "a big market like India and Iraq."

No punitive action

So far, Sri Lanka has been able to prevent the international community from taking any action against it, despite a consistent and high voltage campaign by international and domestic rights organisations. The European Union chose not to introduce a resolution against it at the recent Human Rights Council meeting in Geneva. Japan, one of Sri Lanka's principal donors, had made it clear that sanctions were not the right way to get a point across.

The US periodically expresses concern about the rights situation in the country, but the White House is not contemplating any punitive action.

India's Tacit Support

India, which wants to build strong economic ties with Sri Lanka, has never made a strident comment on the rights situation in the island, despite a past of supporting the minority Tamils, the victims of rights violations.

In fact, today, Colombo enjoys New Delhi's full support. While New Delhi is shy about trumpeting this, powerful elements in the Sri Lankan government like Basil Rajapaksa and the Defense Secretary Gotabhaya Rajapaksa, make no secret of it.
HindustanTimes-Print
© Copyright 2007 Hindustan Times
 
.
Looks like India-Sri Lanka relations are reaching a new level of confidence.
India is doing its bit by not pulling up Sri Lanks for human rights violations and fully supporting the govt. against the LTTE.
 
.
i think india needs to realise 1 thing..which is not to interfere in everything
 
.
Are you suggesting that India could "interfere" with something?

What is something is everything for some and what is everything for some is something for some.

And for some, it is not even interfering!

Perceptions!

Strategy for its own national interest does not mean interfering, or does it?

Pakistan created the Mujahideens and the Taliban for its self interest. Now, that to some is real interfering in Afghanistan.

But that is not how some would see it. They would see it as pursuing the nation's strategic interests.
 
.
i think india needs to realise 1 thing..which is not to interfere in everything

How can sending food to SL be interfering? Its called giving aid! We are helping people. We are not forcing our will on them!
 
.
Who cares if India is saying that Sri Lanka is not violating human rights.

What matters is India is now supporting the Sri Lankan government after seeing that Sri Lankan actual government is here to stay.
 
.
Who cares if India is saying that Sri Lanka is not violating human rights.

What matters is India is now supporting the Sri Lankan government after seeing that Sri Lankan actual government is here to stay.

Govt will stay as long as IN patrols the borders and keep it tight for the LTTE.
 
.
Govt will stay as long as IN patrols the borders and keep it tight for the LTTE.

Are you are suggesting that terrorists are moving, and getting supplies, from/to India?

And if with Indian patrolling the LTTE is still able to exist, then that implies that either the LTTE is completely homegrown and supported (in which case your statement would have been unnecessary, since Indian patrolling would have no effect), or it is just not possible to completely eliminate the flow of men and materials.
 
.
Are you are suggesting that terrorists are moving, and getting supplies, from/to India?

And if with Indian patrolling the LTTE is still able to exist, then that implies that either the LTTE is completely homegrown and supported (in which case your statement would have been unnecessary, since Indian patrolling would have no effect), or it is just not possible to completely eliminate the flow of men and materials.

LTTE is not getting men or supplies from india, but if the IN doesnt patrol, the LTTE fighters will escape to India and take refuge. IN patrolling keeps LTTE terrorists from escaping when things get too hot in SL
 
.
Back
Top Bottom