What's new

KV: One of the most powerful tanks of its time

Lord ZeN

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jul 24, 2014
Messages
2,483
Reaction score
15
Country
India
Location
Japan
Traditionally only Russian ships and aircraft were named after prominent figures, though small arms also bore their inventor’s name. But two Soviet tanks are enshrined in military history not under the customary ‘T-’ prefix but with people’s initials: the KV (Kliment Voroshilov) and the IS (Joseph Stalin). In this two-part piece we look at the heavy KV tank, blooded in the Winter War with Finland, modified to pack a punch that risked flipping it over, and thrown at Hitler’s invading forces with devastating effect in 1941.

gallery_57_468.jpg

In the summer of 1941, as the Nazis implemented their Blitzkrieg strategy in the early months of World War II, using fast tank and infantry attacks to cut off and surround unwieldy Soviet formations, some extraordinary feats took place.

On the second day of the war, amid the confused Soviet retreat, a single KV-2 tank blocked the supply line of the entire German Army Group ‘North’ armored division.

The Wehrmacht’s 11th Tank Regiment’s diary takes up the story, describing how the bridgehead captured by the Raus battle group was cut off by the lone KV, tying up the regiment for two critical days.

“In the afternoon, the reinforced company and the headquarters of the 65th Tank Battalion moved to the intersection to the north-east of Raseynyaya. Meanwhile, a Soviet heavy tank blocked the road, cutting off battle group Raus from the main forces."

“Efforts to destroy the tank through the night were unsuccessful. A battery of 88 mm anti-aircraft guns was brought up, but the 88 mm was no more effective than the 105 mm howitzers. An attempt by sappers to blow up the tank with a mine also failed."



The German frustration grew until an entire operation was launched against the KV on June 25. Several light Czech-made PzKpfw 35 (t) tanks were sent forward to distract the Soviet crew with a barrage of fire while the 88 mm AA guns were brought to bear.

Three of a dozen 88 mm rounds that were fired penetrated the KV, while infantry mounted the tank and tried to open the hatches. As the turret suddenly began to turn the Germans threw in hand grenades until the steel beast finally fell silent.

Inside the wreck the Germans found the remains of six crewmen who had halted the offensive of an entire Panzer division for 48 hours in their immobilized KV-2.

From drawing board to front in under a year

The KV’s history began in early 1939, when the Leningrad Kirov Plant’s chief designer Joseph Kotin proposed developing single-turret tanks as well as multi-turreted designs like the T-35.

Stalin backed the idea. As well as pushing forward work on the multi-turret SMK and T-100 tanks, the plant received orders to build a heavy single-turret model named in honor of Stalin’s Commissar of Defense, Kliment Voroshilov.

Packing less firepower but with thicker armor, the tank weighed 47.5 tons, was driven by a 500-horsepower diesel engine, and was fitted with an epicyclic gearbox and individual torsion bar suspension.

An experimental model impressed a high-ranking panel at the Moscow Region’s Kubinka test range on September 20, surmounting all obstacles with apparent ease.

Driver P.I. Petrov later recorded the challenges of this display in his diary: “I overcame the obstacles with some difficulty in the KV. The engine worked falteringly, and when I crossed the river, water flooded the fighting compartment. Fortunately the engine did not stall and I was able to bring us to the opposite bank.

“I came ashore in short bursts while I worked the steering clutches. According to the test program I then broke a few pines and just about managed to climb the slope. The engine was running at top speed and I couldn’t always change gear.”

After a few adjustments the KV was sent to its baptism of fire in the war with Finland. On Dec. 17, 1939, a tank crewed by factory testers had its first engagement near Lake Summayarvi.

Driver A. I. Yestratov later wrote: “We moved along the anti-tank ditch, exposing our starboard side to fire from the enemy bunkers, shells hitting us like a hammer as we drove. ‘Locate the target, we have to shoot!’ ordered our commander Lieutenant Kachekhin. I looked out while steering clear of some poles that were emitting smoke, and then we took a hit on the other side. I reported this to the commander and we sent back five rounds, scattering the poles and revealing a hidden firing position. Suddenly our gun shuddered. We checked the tank over without getting out and all seemed OK. We went on.”

On the return journey the KV gave a tow to a damaged T-28 tank. After the battle the crew found that the gun barrel had been holed right through.

After the engagement the crew counted 43 strikes from armor-piercing shells on the tank's turret and hull. A caterpillar roller also took a hit but the KV did its work and kept the crew alive.

On Dec. 19, 1939, likely after the battle report of the incident was seen in Moscow, the KV was formally adopted into service and put into mass production.

Ugly duckling

In view of the combat experience gained against the Finns, the KV underwent some final adjustments. The underside of the hull was thickened, ground clearance reduced and some design elements simplified for mass production.

The crew was cut to five, a bow machine-gun was fitted and work commenced on a new main gun. The 76.2 mm L-11 cannon was deemed underpowered and unreliable and the F-32 cannon was ordered instead. On July 7, 1940, the Kirov plant in Leningrad received orders to produce 130 F-32s by the year’s end for the KV.

But the experience of the Winter War also prompted a rethink and a gamble with the main armament. Soviet Marshal Timoshenko proposed fitting the KV with a 152 mm M-10 howitzer to knock out pillboxes and bunkers that had slowed the advancing Soviet forces.

Now weighing in at 52 tons, the newly armed tank was named the KV-2. Its massive, ungainly looking turret could theoretically fire 40-kg and 51-kg concrete-piercing shells – but no one knew if the main frame would withstand such a huge recoil.

“Before the first firing we were all very anxious,” one of the design panel recounts in his memoirs. “As far as we knew, no one in the world had ever installed a gun of this caliber and power on a tank. We thought it might even overturn at the first shot.”

But the KV coped admirably with the new demands and duly went into mass production, adding considerable muscle to the Soviet war machine in its critical hour.
 
Despite the accounts in the article its performance was dismal It failed badly and was relegated to artillery support role its unsually big profile gave easy target to the high velocity shots from German penzers that had single shot kill ability
tanks like T33 in medium and JS I , II & III on the otherhand were winners in armor firepower design mobility and innovation in heavy tanks category
 
Last edited:
This was a dud tank by and large,the kv-1 was more formidable and an actual tank rather than an artillery platform on tracks like kv-2.
 
against Germany,though they didn't have any proper primary AT weapons to fight both KV and T-34,faced massive losses,though not all of them in German hands,but sometimes to Non-Combat losses as well.but these two tanks changed Tank design for ever as Germany resorted to adopt heavier designs like Tiger and Panther after encountering these tanks.and we all know what followed after these tanks got fielded..

by the way,I heard similar stories for T-34 too..at the very first encounter,a T-34 suddenly leaped out in front a German Brigade and kept firing.after some 30 pr more minutes later,a Howitzer(possible) destroyed it from close range.but before that,it already destroyed some panzer tanks,AT guns and as much as 22 vehicles of all sort.AT guns fired some 22 shots but only could jam its turret.I've watched it in a documentary.
 
Despite the accounts in the article its performance was dismal It failed badly and was relegated to artillery support role its unsually big profile gave easy target to the high velocity shots from German penzers that had single shot kill ability
tanks like T33 in medium and JS I , II & III on the otherhand were winners in armor firepower design mobility and innovation in heavy tanks category

Yeah... KV2 was kinda disappointing.

against Germany,though they didn't have any proper primary AT weapons to fight both KV and T-34,faced massive losses,though not all of them in German hands,but sometimes to Non-Combat losses as well.but these two tanks changed Tank design for ever as Germany resorted to adopt heavier designs like Tiger and Panther after encountering these tanks.and we all know what followed after these tanks got fielded..

by the way,I heard similar stories for T-34 too..at the very first encounter,a T-34 suddenly leaped out in front a German Brigade and kept firing.after some 30 pr more minutes later,a Howitzer(possible) destroyed it from close range.but before that,it already destroyed some panzer tanks,AT guns and as much as 22 vehicles of all sort.AT guns fired some 22 shots but only could jam its turret.I've watched it in a documentary.


The Germans never expected the Russians to come out with something that would be so effective as the KV1s and T34s... and one they did they were more than surprised unprepared and quite shocked. Thats why we can find examples of encounters like the one you mentioned.

Both tanks were superior to the Panzer Is, IIs, III, and early IVs in many ways.

But the Russians had terrible tactics, even worse communications (They did not have radios, except in command tank,.. they communicated via FLAGS!) and their training was also abysmal (Tank crews sometimes were sent into battle after ONE (!) hour of training....
Thats why the KV1s and T 34s could not do much against the well trained Germans using sophisticated and innovated tactics... most Russian commanders (those who survived Stalins purges) did not take ANY risks at all and kept retreating, fearing of getting into a court martial.
 
Inside the wreck the Germans found the remains of six crewmen who had halted the offensive of an entire Panzer division for 48 hours in their immobilized KV-2.
If anything that deserves a movie portrayal not that FURY fiction
 
KV: One of the most powerful tanks of its time, part 2

In this second part of the story of the Soviet KV battle tank, we look at how over its long years of service, the KV went from star player to standard asset before transitioning to the somewhat eccentric yet honored old guard.
RIAN_00001052.HR.ru_468.jpg


The hastily created KV underwent further developments after the start of World War II. Steel panels added to the turret increased its armor thickness to 120 mm, but pushed the tank’s overall mass to 50 tons. This adversely affected maneuverability and suspension reliability, and eventually the change was reversed.

Turrets with thicker welded armor plates were then produced, while alterations were also made to the tank’s armament. In Fall 1941, the KV-1 carried the L-11 and F-32 (34) cannons, but these were then replaced with the more reliable ZIS-5, which was the same caliber, but had a longer barrel.

On the battlefield

In the early stages of World War II, the German forces were startled by the KV’s resilience to fire. The tank could only be breached with any certainty with a shell from a Flak-36 88-mm anti-aircraft gun, and Soviet battle accounts chronicle the KV’s valiant performance against German armor and artillery.

“I see fountains of earth as I look through the periscope,” Soviet tank officer Gregory Penezhko wrote of one engagement. “Whichever way I turn I see German tanks, having taken us in a semicircle from north to south.”

TASS_1229393_468.jpg

Moscow. USSR. A KV tank moving along the streets. December 19, 1941. Source: TASS


“Sparks are showering off the turret and sides of the commander’s tanks as shell after shell hits but glances off. One German tank stood in the way of Vasiliyev, who instead of wasting a round simply rammed the enemy machine, knocking the turret clean off.”


“Vasilyev’s tank sets off forward again, and the colonel opens the hatch and pokes out his head, using flags to give us orders. Suddenly sparks belch from both the left and right side of the turret, the tank loses speed and stops, flames bursting from the open hatch.”

But the KV also made short work of the German armor. In one battle, a squadron of Soviet tanks under the ace Zinovii Kolobanov knocked out a total of 43 enemy tanks.

Kolobanov placed five KV-1s so that they could fire down the narrow road through a village while concealing themselves behind the houses. The Soviets let the enemy scouts pass and waited until an entire column of Panzer IIs and IIIs appeared before them, knocking out the first and last vehicles to immobilize the remaining tanks.


The German crews were shot down by Soviet machine-gunners as they scrambled from what would soon be charred wrecks of their Panzers. Kolobanov’s crew alone is credited with destroying 22 enemy tanks.

By Fall 1941, the Flak-36 was issued with special sub-caliber ammunition, which enabled its use against heavy Soviet tanks in addition to its anti-aircraft role. After the Battle of Moscow, Soviet tank warfare strategist Mikhail Katukov recalls seeing the instruction “Shoot only at the KV” scrawled on captured guns.

The efforts of the German forces to destroy the heavy tanks were also reflected in the reward for a successful kill: German soldiers received eight days leave for a T-34 and up to 14 for a KV.

The KV’s reputation of invincibility lasted until December 1941, when Hitler ordered the use of the hitherto secret rocket-boosted shells after the start of the counteroffensive outside Moscow.

After the KV became as vulnerable as the T-34, criticism was heaped on its failings, including its unreliable transmission, poor maneuverability, low speed and excessive weight.

KV: One of the most powerful tanks of its time

There were hitches of a non-technical nature, too. The Soviet Union had plenty of tanks, but not enough trained crews. Even after universal education was introduced in 1930, it was unrealistic to expect much technical expertise among fighting forces that had been recently drafted from the farm.

The majority of Soviet crewmen had never driven a car before they were called up, let alone a tractor or a tank. The battle report of the 8th Mechanized Corps from 22nd to 26th June 1941 reports: “Most KV and T-34 drivers have had three to five hours of practical experience,” adding that cohesive tactical ability was seldom observed above the company or battalion level.

As a result, many KV breakdowns and losses were not due to any technical fault of the vehicle, but rather to crew incompetence.

The variety of tanks in service also did not help matters. As a commander of one tank training tank battalion wrote: “The difficulty was that while driving on roads, the medium and light tanks went at approximately the same speed, but when travelling off-road, the light tanks quickly lagged behind. So did the heavy tanks, and worse still, bridges often collapsed beneath them, bringing everything to a halt.”

The report continued: “Usually only the T-34s could fight mobile battles because the light tanks couldn’t manage the enemy tanks and the heavy KV remained in the rear. Moreover, coordinating a mixed compliment of tanks in battle is difficult because the KV, T-34 and T-60 all have different types of radios.”

With time, the KV-1 became lighter and more practicable, but in terms of firepower and protection, it did not differ from the medium tanks. Meanwhile, there was little sense in continuing production of the more heavily armed KV-2.

A transitional model was developed and named the KV-1S; the “S” stood for “speed.”

An 85-mm gun was later fitted with a turret from the new IS-1 heavy tank to produce the KV-85. At the time of its launch in August 1943, however, the KV-85 was far inferior to the German heavy tanks.


Nevertheless, until the introduction of the IS-1, the new KV was the only Soviet tank capable of fighting heavy German armor at up to 1,000 meters. And after the Battle of Moscow, the KV was still the pride of the Soviet leadership. In 1942, Stalin ordered the transfer of one KV-1 to both Britain and the United States so that the steel beast could be admired abroad too.

This hulking veteran of the heaviest fighting of World War II still awaits visitors to the Tank Museum at Bovington and the U.S. Army Ordnance Museum in Richmond, Virginia.

The KV-1 and KV-1S are also on display at the Kubinka Tank Museum outside Moscow, while the last surviving KV-2 in the world stands at the Central Armed Forces Museum in Moscow.

 
Back
Top Bottom