Boy the size of your message simply shows you are getting hyped up and accusing me of being butt hurt
... i am loving it....On a serious note let's not loose the context as well..try and reply back with pin-pointed questions/replies....
It is a lie. I have already provided keywords on the first page for further research to find out the reality behind this very famous Indian lie. Looks like due to butt hurt and heart burn you are not interested in further researching about them. Indians often run to 1971 to cure the burn that is caused to them when people laugh and dismiss their lies of
"we won all wars with Pakistan". You did the same. Big hearts. Don't know. But heart burns definitely yes.
..... where did i claim that?? I only said after 47-48 gains your kashmir policy has boomeranged on you...and yes 71 is a glaring example...what is there to run from here?? It is a fact simple....Alright let's do this...List me the gains viz-a-viz territory vs any losses that you may have suffer...give it a shot and perhaps you will get what boomeranged means...
Questioning my comprehension ability looks so stupid since in coming lines you come with a very weak and poor analogy. Like the example and comparison you have made is even dumber than calling Kashmir integral part of India.
Only thing this proves is that situation in Kashmir is so bad and against India that
even hyper nationalist Indian media has no choice to report the truth even though it is done in bits and pieces. That however doesn't mean that Indian media has accepted the hard facts and reality of Kashmir completely. They propagate fake videos about AJK to defend the sh!t happening inside IOK. This report is no proof of freedom inside india.
On one hand you say
hyper nationalistic and on same token you say they are
forced to report because situation is this bad...you are not even making any sense now...A hyper nationalistic media will not give two hoots about anything but national interests...simple...I will repeat again...There is nothing to hide because no-one can change the status quo here...A bitter fact and hard to swallow..but alas truth!! Though now i am wondering what is being fed to you guys....Anyways let me do a futile attempt...
Tourism Boom in Kashmir - WSJ
Now can your claim and above goes hand in hand??
Fringe elements like people of Kashmir?
...Because they are the only individuals who you want to control with such tyrannic measures. To stop them from managing and holding protests against Indian rule. It is an action against civilians of Kashmir and not some militant organization.
And this is the dumb example I was talking about in above paragraphs. You are comparing apples and oranges. We impose such curbs to avoid any terrorist blowing himself in processions of Shia Pakistanis.
Read the keyword. TERRORIST. To avoid terrorists from using internet and mobile services to kill innocent Pakistan. While in India's case this ban is imposed to curb civilians and youth of Kashmir so that they can hold protests against Indian rule. See. that is the difference. We don't impose ban on 14th August to stop anyone from holding any protest against state of Pakistan like it is in your case.
So you do it because you want to stop terrorist and we do it because we are tyrants...right??
....Anyways i don't expect you to apply your brain here and crack a simple thing - Internet bans or curfews are imposed to stop situation getting out of control...this is not an indicator that the place is not free...We do it on 14th August...15th August or for that matter any day of the year...the idea and logic for fringe elements to expolit the situation will not change...
And the question is YES. Not only journalists but diplomats have traveled to that region to check the situation after the operation. Unlike India who was fighting a low "hit and run" insurgency Pakistan's record in human rights is far better and clean who was actually fighting hardcore terrorists who were holding and ruling territories to attack Pakistani state and people. One reason behind this is that Pk army was fighting in its own country while Indian army is fighting in a foreign land occupying and crushing people who are stranger to them.
Atleast read before shamelessly replying back..."independently verify claims" is the key there...Taking someone to a place after operation vs independent research are two different things...regarding your comment on whose human rights record is better then please quote some "Neutral Source" suggesting that...and then we can talk...
You can quote it again and again. Your thinking about Pakistan or scumbags aka Kashmiri people for you in this case also doesn't matter. I am not even trying to prove anything to you. I don't need to. I said much earlier that Kashmir is a lost cause for India. People of that unfortunate region are against their occupiers from New Delhi. which works very well for us. I am just enjoying the lame as$ excuses you Indians come up with to defend the indefensible. And I am just answering those excuses. Whatever I wanted to prove, I have proven it in the very first post.
Talk about self obsession
....
Might be first time you have said something that is true. Yeah you are not sending any "paid missionary" or "paid mercenary" as it was the term you were looking for. Not at least in AJK and GB. Can't say the same for other parts of Pakistan though. And the reason that you are not sending any paid mercenary in AJK and GB is that you can't. You simply can't send them since there is no local support for such elements in AJK and GB. You know people who form the majority in Azad Kashmir Regiment and Northern Light Infantry Regiment won't support any such terrorists. You also know that and hence don't send them in AJK and GB "at least".
First thanks for correcting me...Yes i meant Paid Mercenary ...and for rest of the reply
......
Look we both are repeating our points now...so let me put a pause here...unless and until you have some replies for the questions i raised or some specifc questions for me..consider this as my last reply....
...regarding Majority Kashmiris...are you calculating Pakistanis living in P-O-K as well?? because on our side there are issues and people are unhappy with GOI....and why shouldn't they be?? Today's youth want jobs and prosperity which GOI has failed to provide...However painting Majority of Kashmiri's in the same brush is a propaganda that suits your case but not reality.... Nevertheless we won't mind you keep thinking that way...History is there when you have assumed similar stuff but always got disappointment...
