What's new

Justice For Kashmir' banner files above during India-Sri Lanka

. . .
Interesting that the previous banner in Pak vs Afg match was also in Headingley. Is it easy to get people to fly plane in that location?
 
.
They should have done it during a Pakistani match ,it would have got more coverage .when Kohli or Rohit is batting there won't be many in the stadium who will be looking at the sky.:-)
 
. . . .
haha no, just to tell that nobody cares other than a few Pakistanis.

Please tell us how much you don't care a little more it won't get this any more attention.

Think original guys, for a change.

You're right the response to destroying a few trees was shooting down of 2 planes and the Indian response was silence along with firing and replacing of a few people. This does seem a little underwhelming so it must be the doing of some non-Pakistanis.
 
.
D-yYaUWUwAAXkOF.jpg

In yet another incident that had political overtones, an unnamed aircraft flew over the Headingley stadium with a pro-Kashmir banner during the World Cup match between India and Sri Lanka, here Saturday.

Minutes after the match began, an aircraft carrying the banner 'Justice for Kashmir' flew above the ground.

This is second such incident inside 10 days after Afghanistan and Pakistan fans clashed at the venue after 'Justice for Balochistan' banner was displayed by an unnamed aircraft that landed at the Bradford airport.

https://wap.business-standard.com/a...119070600464_1.html?__twitter_impression=true

If it was wrong flying "justice for Belusistan"" then flying this banner too is wrong. Keep the game free of dispute.
 
. .
Brilliant move, Pakistani Patriots should fly such banners throughout the rest of India's matches all the way to the final, Indians, on the other hand, would never get a chance to respond. Now we know why Pakistani team wanted to exit early.
 
.
Ok sir, but why are you here on Pak forum today? we dont know who flew the banners today and last week, but it was done in UK, why dont you go to a UK forum and discuss this with British people?

I don't wish to discuss it with them. Lol, you are unnecessarily emotional and belligerent. I am just suggesting that assumption that India did it is wrong.

You're right the response to destroying a few trees was shooting down of 2 planes and the Indian response was silence along with firing and replacing of a few people. This does seem a little underwhelming so it must be the doing of some non-Pakistanis.

Pakistan's idea was to copy India and drops bombs here and run back. Same idea, nothing original. A plane got shot down only because unlike the PAF on 26th Feb, the IAF on 27th Feb challenged the PAF. And if you are going to continue claiming two planes shot down despite no proof of the second plane, we might as well add the F-16 downed in the discussion too.
 
.
Pakistan's idea was to copy India and drops bombs here and run back. Same idea, nothing original. A plane got shot down only because unlike the PAF on 26th Feb, the IAF on 27th Feb challenged the PAF. And if you are going to continue claiming two planes shot down despite no proof of the second plane, we might as well add the F-16 downed in the discussion too.

Well I'd consider dropping bombs near military top brass to be different from bombing a crow but it is Indian military top brass so you might be right. :undecided:

There is proof of the second plane though, IAF admits a second plane was shot down. Also the videos from the day show more than 1 parachute from different angles as well as locals verbally confirming seeing more than one pilot in said videos. The Indian claim was also that Abhinandan shot down F-16 but all of his missiles are on display and his testimony confirmed he was in the airspace no more than 90 seconds and was "looking for his target". The only Indian plane present, that was 2 seater, is Indian SU-30. Let me know if I'm missing something.

Brilliant move, Pakistani Patriots should fly such banners throughout the rest of India's matches all the way to the final, Indians, on the other hand, would never get a chance to respond. Now we know why Pakistani team wanted to exit early.

What makes you think this is Pakistan's doing?
 
.
There is proof of the second plane though, IAF admits a second plane was shot down. Also the videos from the day show more than 1 parachute from different angles as well as locals verbally confirming seeing more than one pilot in said videos. The Indian claim was also that Abhinandan shot down F-16 but all of his missiles are on display and his testimony confirmed he was in the airspace no more than 90 seconds and was "looking for his target". The only Indian plane present, that was 2 seater, is Indian SU-30. Let me know if I'm missing something.

What you are missing here is proof and evidence. Whatever you have suggested here is nothing.

OTOH, we are still waiting on the explanation on the second pilot caught by your army and who was the second pilot who Pakistani villagers on video claim to have caught in a far away location from where Abhi was caught.

Even your own ex air commodore has recently written in an article that PAF itself is not sure about Su-30s downing.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom