Please report this fellow using the report the second he posts anything off topic in usual self fellatioStay on topic and take your Tejas fantasies to the relevant thread.
@waz @WAJsal @TaimiKhan
take note
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Please report this fellow using the report the second he posts anything off topic in usual self fellatioStay on topic and take your Tejas fantasies to the relevant thread.
@waz @WAJsal @TaimiKhan
take note
I don't know why so many of you like the JH-7 so much.
It is an outdated aircraft, which the PLA is phasing out and replacing with J-16. There are NO on-going projects to upgrade radar, engines, avionics or anything else. PLA is using JH-7 as a stand-off missile platform, a modified 1950s bomber(H-6K) could've done the same job.
There's no point buying a second hand plane that is outdated before you even bought it. Just like how PAF isn't trying to get more Mirages, it's more or less the same.
Get J-16, get Su-34, get whatever heavy fighter you have access to. They all are much more capable in general. Unless PAF need a plane to fill the "cost effective standoff missile launching platform" role and that role only, there's no point buying JH-7.
And stop fantasizing about JH-7B, there's no such thing. All JH-7B "leaked" pictures are proven to be photoshopped. There might have been a EW version, but that role is replaced by J-16 now.
No problem in fantasising any type of aircraft, but for your knowledge JH-7A even never came into PAF consideration as it's a almost failed project due to non availablility of a suitable engine. And it's a loose copy of F4 phantom fighter. This type could have been viable only if was available in eighties when Russian invasion was on the verge and PAF bought A-5
I don't know why so many of you like the JH-7 so much.
It is an outdated aircraft, which the PLA is phasing out and replacing with J-16. There are NO on-going projects to upgrade radar, engines, avionics or anything else. PLA is using JH-7 as a stand-off missile platform, a modified 1950s bomber(H-6K) could've done the same job.
There's no point buying a second hand plane that is outdated before you even bought it. Just like how PAF isn't trying to get more Mirages, it's more or less the same.
Get J-16, get Su-34, get whatever heavy fighter you have access to. They all are much more capable in general. Unless PAF need a plane to fill the "cost effective standoff missile launching platform" role and that role only, there's no point buying JH-7.
And stop fantasizing about JH-7B, there's no such thing. All JH-7B "leaked" pictures are proven to be photoshopped. There might have been a EW version, but that role is replaced by J-16 now.
I think instead of JH7, PAF should acquire a Chinese copy of Su-34, J11,16 whatever they call it. Why? Because commonality with other Chinese, Russian platforms with bring down production cost and availability of spare parts will be easier while serving the same purpose, BVR truck, fighter bomber. @MastanKhan
Get J-16, get Su-34, get whatever heavy fighter you have access to. They all are much more capable in general. Unless PAF need a plane to fill the "cost effective standoff missile launching platform" role and that role only, there's no point buying JH-7.
Hi,
Sorry that I missed your tag---. SU34 is not available to pakistan---JH7B still has a better wing design for low flight---specially for naval strike missions---or for flying over the sea hitting land targets---.
Strike aircraft are different than air superiority aircraft---just remember---flying a bomber or a strike aircaft is a different frame of mind---you have to think operate train and act differently than a fighter pilot---.
On current strike missions---U S pilots prefer the 50 years old design A10 over the newer 5th gen F35---.
Just because it is comparatively older---does not mean an aircraft is obsolete---. Modern day EW suite---a potent fire control radar---smart weapons have done miracles for these old dogs---.
Plus---the JH7B is a proven and tested system---it has gone thru all the phases of integration o current weapons and can be integrated with modern newer weapons---.
So---tactically---for the price---it is the best choice and bang for the buck---.
Hi,
That is exactly the role the Paf needs it for---for over the water tsriking enemy's land installations----.
Just because they are new and shiny---does not mean they have all the advantages---. None of the newer aircraft you mentioned can match the wing design of the JH7B---or you may call it JH7A---. This aircraft is perfectly suitable for low flight missions over the sea for hitting enemy land targets---.
Plus Paf can get them for almost close to nothing. With its range and strike power---we can touch enemy's areas far deeper than anticipated---thus forcing the enemy to spread its assets thin.
whats the planning regarding FGFAFGFA has been rejected point blank by india
the tejas is in production as you can see