JF-17 Insane Take off

[Windjammer]

Sorry @araz Bahi, couldn't resist it as THE VIDEO is not yet available for public viewing hence the screenshot. The JF-17 in full afterburner going ballistic soon after liftoff with two fuel tanks is a sight to hold. As can be seen that it's going up half way down the runway while others have to go straight to the full stretch of the runway to power up and then climb. Another thing worth noting is that the JF-17 is now operating with NVG.

@Dazzler @Taimoor Khan @Hodor @Oscar @HRK @MastanKhan

 

[Dazzler]

Sorry @araz Bahi, couldn't resist it as THE VIDEO is not yet available for public viewing hence the screenshot. The JF-17 in full afterburner going ballistic soon after liftoff with two fuel tanks is a sight to hold. As can be seen that it's going up half way down the runway while others have to go straight to the full stretch of the runway to power up and then climb. Another thing worth noting is that the JF-17 is now operating with NVG.

View attachment 448268
@Dazzler @Taimoor Khan @Hodor @Oscar @HRK @MastanKhan

Its using Black Rose NVGs for now.

 

[Windjammer]

Its using Black Rose NVGs for now.

There is a reference but wasn't sure of the type.

 

[Dazzler]

There is a reference but wasn't sure of the type.

True, they couldve gone for those half a dozen local 2nd gen IIT based goggles too but, oh well.

 

[Irfan Baloch]

while others have to go straight to the full stretch of the runway to power up and then climb.

View attachment 448268
@Dazzler @Taimoor Khan @Hodor @Oscar @HRK @MastanKhan

now that is telling and that too with fuel tanks
I wonder which one? the one that normally makes it appearance on the back of a truck?

 

[war&peace]

now that is telling and that too without fuel tanks

Acc. to OP with fuel tanks and that makes it a better capability as the g's are higher with fuel tanks. It might be on the very extremities of VN-diagram

 

[Irfan Baloch]

Acc. to OP with fuel tanks and that makes it a better capability as the g's are higher with fuel tanks. It might be on the very extremities of VN-diagram

i meant "with" let me correct

 

[CriticalThought]

Masha Allah. Alhamdulillah.

 

[Windjammer]

now that is telling and that too with fuel tanks
I wonder which one? the one that normally makes it appearance on the back of a truck?

That's the whole point and it doesn't either levels out after reaching say 500 Feet.
Oh the truck is part of the system so the privileged ones can have a good look at it since you will agree it's the best version of stealth aircraft out there, I mean which other jet remains almost invisible even after 30 years of trials and tests.

 

[Crystal-Clear]

qsam se kuch samajh ni araha .
.
.
comments perh k bhi .

 

[Raider 21]

Sorry @araz Bahi, couldn't resist it as THE VIDEO is not yet available for public viewing hence the screenshot. The JF-17 in full afterburner going ballistic soon after liftoff with two fuel tanks is a sight to hold. As can be seen that it's going up half way down the runway while others have to go straight to the full stretch of the runway to power up and then climb. Another thing worth noting is that the JF-17 is now operating with NVG.

View attachment 448268
@Dazzler @Taimoor Khan @Hodor @Oscar @HRK @MastanKhan

The F-16 can still outflank the Thunder in terms of performance. The JF-17 still requires a longer distance before it can rotate, the F-16 requires a lot less. The "others" are probably the F-7s and Mirages. And the F-16 exhibits a better rate of climb in full afterburner....regardless of configuration.

 

[Ultima Thule]

The F-16 can still outflank the Thunder in terms of performance. The JF-17 still requires a longer distance before it can rotate, the F-16 requires a lot less. The "others" are probably the F-7s and Mirages. And the F-16 exhibits a better rate of climb in full afterburner....regardless of configuration.

Yes because of better T/W ratio sir

 

[krash]

the g's are higher with fuel tanks.

No they aren't. The g value does not depend on the mass, it depends on the velocity and vector delta.

 

[Raider 21]

Yes because of better T/W ratio sir

And design...

Sorry @araz Bahi, couldn't resist it as THE VIDEO is not yet available for public viewing hence the screenshot. The JF-17 in full afterburner going ballistic soon after liftoff with two fuel tanks is a sight to hold. As can be seen that it's going up half way down the runway while others have to go straight to the full stretch of the runway to power up and then climb. Another thing worth noting is that the JF-17 is now operating with NVG.

View attachment 448268
@Dazzler @Taimoor Khan @Hodor @Oscar @HRK @MastanKhan

Hopefully I'll be seeing this regularly in a few weeks at Kamra.

 

[war&peace]

No they aren't. The g value does not depend on the mass, it depends on the velocity and vector delta.

Yes, they are. I meant the g-forces ...the dimensional load F = m * gs on airframe and lugs. I'm talking in terms of Newtons or lbf and not m/s^2