What's new

Jawaharlal Nehru-led Congress, not Muhammad Ali Jinnah was responsible for Partition: Farooq Abdulla

Put Nehru picture on Pakistani currency, thank you.
 
.
Yup, 70 so years on, more muslims get slaughtered In the land for Muslims , you better know what to say, mod or no modi buddy

Khawarij aka terrorists are not considered Muslims the moment they decide to kill the innocent people. Given Indian-funded Afghan-based Terrorist-outfit aka TTP that is responsible for more than 100,000 death in Pakistan, genocide on large scale in Indian Occupied Kashmir and the gujarat genocide that alone put Modi on the power along with his political party rampaging Muslims everywhere in the name of beef laws which most of allegations lacked concrete evidence to back with doesn't exactly present ideal scenario for Muslims at all.

It is like India wants Islam/Muslims removed from the facet of the earth. Pakistan exists to keep India on toe.
 
.
But in the end
Jinnah had to accept Partition. So Jinnah pushed for partition at the last minute.

Besides that, partition was the right thing to do.

We have nothing to do with those Indians.
Jinnah gave two option
  1. either accept cabinet mission(unchanged, non negotiable)
  2. or partition
congress accepted partition

congress gave option of modifying cabinet mission to make 1/4 in center and remove clause of grouping provinces

Gandhi was here in of opinion to accept Jinnah conditions but he was sidelined, Nehru convinced his people in congress that Pakistan cannot exist and will collapse on its own

Considering Indian Muslims are being slaughtered left and right in the name of beef laws based on Hindu political ideology, Pakistan as nation is relief for Muslims who can practice their faiths unopposed and sacrifice cows during the Eid days.

# On topic, Nehru was the best thing happened to Pakistan. First, Jinnah (R.A) learned the truth, then Pakistan did. Somewhere from 2001 to 2007, people forgot the historical lesson as they were getting caught up with Aman Ki Asha while people in Pakistan were being killed by Indian-funded Afghan-based Terrorist-outfit aka TTP for years amount up to 100,000 and beyond.

Then, Modi happened. People in Pakistan is reminded of the history and why Pakistan exists and now they are grateful for Pakistan more than they have ever been in their life.
two alternatives might have happened
1. congress(nehru) and BJP (Patel) accepts cabinet mission
correct without nehru Pakistan would have been either non existent with loose Indian federation(which would have been theoretically be an ideal state, had both congress/BJP been purely secular) or
pakistan/ separate federation among the three groups(per clause) would have formed later

this however would have meant a much more tolerant india and pakistan with no major migrations and open boarders, and no large minorities in pakistan

2. BJP/congress forces hand of British govt to annul partition
this would meant short term large riots and long term it would meant complete suppression of Muslim a as
society
, much much worse than what we see in india today as whole regions would have been in poverty, you would not seen western punjab developed at all or sindh gotten so much irrigation that it got after partition, or ho wbengal developed rapidly from 1947-71 and so on
 
.
It is like India wants Islam/Muslims removed from the facet of the earth. Pakistan exists to keep India on toe.

If Indians wanted to wipe off muslims, they would have done so, like Pakistan did with its minorities, not let Muslims increase in numbers to the point they are increasing faster than the rest of the religions in India combined .

Meanwhile if your reason for existence is to keep.india on its toes, that means you are just a sidekick to us and will always be..:lol:
 
.
If Indians wanted to wipe off muslims, they would have done so, like Pakistan did with its minorities, not let Muslims increase in numbers to the point they are increasing faster than the rest of the religions in India combined .

Meanwhile if your reason for existence is to keep.india on its toes, that means you are just a sidekick to us and will always be..:lol:
nice try. Pakistan will never be a sidekick to India. LOL. Pakistanis hate or don't care about Indians.

Jinnah gave two option
  1. either accept cabinet mission(unchanged, non negotiable)
  2. or partition
congress accepted partition

congress gave option of modifying cabinet mission to make 1/4 in center and remove clause of grouping provinces

Gandhi was here in of opinion to accept Jinnah conditions but he was sidelined, Nehru convinced his people in congress that Pakistan cannot exist and will collapse on its own


two alternatives might have happened
1. congress(nehru) and BJP (Patel) accepts cabinet mission
correct without nehru Pakistan would have been either non existent with loose Indian federation(which would have been theoretically be an ideal state, had both congress/BJP been purely secular) or
pakistan/ separate federation among the three groups(per clause) would have formed later

this however would have meant a much more tolerant india and pakistan with no major migrations and open boarders, and no large minorities in pakistan

2. BJP/congress forces hand of British govt to annul partition
this would meant short term large riots and long term it would meant complete suppression of Muslim a as
society
, much much worse than what we see in india today as whole regions would have been in poverty, you would not seen western punjab developed at all or sindh gotten so much irrigation that it got after partition, or ho wbengal developed rapidly from 1947-71 and so on
Regardless,

I think partition was the right thing to do. There was no other way to solve the communal problem.
 
.
nice try. Pakistan will never be a sidekick to India. LOL. Pakistanis hate or don't care about Indians

Ain't my try, some Pakistanis like the one who I quoted certainly think so, take it up with them,
 
. .
No

No, you are the one who mentioned sidekick. All Pakistanis hate India.

If Pakistan's raison de etre is to keep India on its toes as mentioned by your compatriot , you derive your validation from india, makes you a sidekick..

How hard is that logic to understand beats me, or is it you have trouble with basic logic?
 
.
If Pakistan's raison de etre is to keep India on its toes as mentioned by your compatriot , you derive your validation from india, makes you a sidekick..

How hard is that logic to understand beats me, or is it you have trouble with basic logic?
sidekick means being a support. Pakistan is not a support but a enemy of India.

Didn't I tell you Pakistanis hate Indians! :lol:
 
.
sidekick means being a support. Pakistan is not a support but a enemy of India.

Didn't I tell you Pakistanis hate Indians! :lol:

I'm not here to give you an education on meanings and usage, if you wanted one you should have gone to a school.
 
. .
If Indians wanted to wipe off muslims, they would have done so, like Pakistan did with its minorities, not let Muslims increase in numbers to the point they are increasing faster than the rest of the religions in India combined .

Indians are already doing that taking mass oppression in Indian Occupied Kashmir and genocide on the large scale in India. Before 1947, it was ruled by British Kingdom. Before that, Muslims ruled over India for centurions. If they wanted, they could have wiped Hindus from the facet of the earth.

And the minority are relatively safer and is increase from 1947. The reason the minority population was higher because East Pakistan aka Bangladesh was taken into the account which had highest minority population. Without East Pakistan from 1947 to now, the minority population is still increase.

And minority in Pakistan don't have to worry about genocidal Prime Minister whereas Muslims do have to worry about Genocidal Modi [which is legitimized by India] and his political communal party into the account. Not to mention, Ajit Doval, in-charge of Indian NSA, that is responsible for more than 100,000 deaths in Pakistan including children and women.

Meanwhile if your reason for existence is to keep.india on its toes, that means you are just a sidekick to us and will always be..:lol:

Clearly, reading comprehension might be issue for you.

Let me try the version that you may understand;

Indian is crying because India cannot take its land back [Azad Kashmir and Pakistan]. And India is losing more population to Islam.

Every times India tries to take over ends up taking backseat because Pakistan is not afraid to reply. India and its father [USA] which the same old story over crying about Pakistan for the umpteenth times already given the period from 1947 to now. It is getting embarrassing. :D
 
Last edited:
. . .
Partition happened, better for Indians to accept it and move on! Partition was for the best. I am extremely grateful for it.

I wouldn't say partition was the best thing happened. It was necessary move or else parish. It was do or die situation. What Jinnah (R.A) did was the last resort [made choice for him] which is in accordance to the principle of Islam. Drastic measure should be taken with everything into consideration at the last resort.

If it wasn't for Nehru, that last resort wouldn't have come into the picture. Bear in mind, millions of people died due to the result of partition. Sometimes i wonder how many people would have died in the daily communal riots had partition not happened. Despite the partition, people are dying everyday in the communal riots whether in India or Indian Occupied Kashmir. Daily communal riots is averted to the certain portion which now we call Pakistan. Whereas for India, it is still on and on the large scale in the name of beef laws as the triggered by the election of Genocidal Modi with the majority support of the public and their hatred for Islam. It cannot be coincidence why they were majority voters for Donald Trump in USA.
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom