What's new

Japan NHK report: Clear photos of China building artificial islands in SCS

cnleio

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Dec 23, 2012
Messages
10,563
Reaction score
19
Country
China
Location
China
Japan NHK report: Clear photos of China building artificial islands in SCS

2015.03.09 The JP NHK released photos provided by PHP Army to show China building artificial islands in SCS. In January and February PHP Army took photos of Mischief Reef/ Subi Reef/ Fiery Cross Island/ Gaven Reef in SCS, Chinese workers r busy expanding lands & building many infrastructures on above islands.

3月9日,日本NHK电视台通过转播菲律宾军方照片对中国在南海进行的填海扩建活动进行了报道。
NHK称根据菲律宾军方今年一月与二月的空中侦察。中国南海多个岛礁的扩建工程正在加速进行,其中包括美济礁、渚碧礁、永暑礁、南薰礁等。


:coffee::coffee::coffee: ... there's a Eight floors building on Fiery Cross Island, we don't know what's it ?
111.jpg
 
. .
Extraordinary as if done by the spirits of nature
Viet and Philippine will regret forcing referee to kick the ball at western instigation
 
Last edited:
. .
Off-Topic but can such islands be used for private stuff ? Like if any millionaire wants to buy one ?
 
.
I don't think Vietnam or Philippines have the money or technology to build islands so far away from their mainland.
 
. .
To be honest, very impressive capabilities of our Chinese friends.

@cnleio ,


To be honest, Japan doesn't really criticize openly because we, too, are building islands. Tho much further south of our Empire. :)

One example is the Okinotorishima Island, which will become a naval base. :)

Oki-notori-shima-Japan_China-sept162009[1].jpg



ccf48563[1].jpg



okinotori6.jpg



okinotorishima.jpg



18774195.jpg



Aqua-Line.png



20140401_ship_Yomiuri-ShimbunANN.jpg



he he he ;)
 
.
Maybe we should consider building a reclaimed island over Benham rise.
 
.
To be honest, very impressive capabilities of our Chinese friends.

@cnleio ,


To be honest, Japan doesn't really criticize openly because we, too, are building islands. Tho much further south of our Empire. :)

One example is the Okinotorishima Island, which will become a naval base. :)

View attachment 200809


View attachment 200810


okinotori6.jpg



okinotorishima.jpg



18774195.jpg



Aqua-Line.png



20140401_ship_Yomiuri-ShimbunANN.jpg



he he he ;)

I remember reading an article that sample of the coral (which was not growing well) was removed & taken back to Japan, they were then cultivated in a lab (to accelerate grow or something) then transffered back to the site, & viola, it grows! lol. Very impressive use of biotech in marine life cultivation, is it true buddy?
 
.
I remember reading an article that sample of the coral (which was not growing well) was removed & taken back to Japan, they were then cultivated in a lab (to accelerate grow or something) then transffered back to the site, & viola, it grows! lol. Very impressive use of biotech in marine life cultivation, is it true buddy?

Yes, buddy!!
 
. .
To be honest, very impressive capabilities of our Chinese friends.

@cnleio ,


To be honest, Japan doesn't really criticize openly because we, too, are building islands. Tho much further south of our Empire. :)

One example is the Okinotorishima Island, which will become a naval base. :)

View attachment 200809


View attachment 200810


okinotori6.jpg



okinotorishima.jpg



18774195.jpg



Aqua-Line.png



20140401_ship_Yomiuri-ShimbunANN.jpg



he he he ;)

I thought it was China who fiercely opposed Japan establishing its EEZ by contstructing artificial island/building in okinotorishima.

I don't know how China could justify building artifical island in SCS to claim EEZ surrounding the sea. These two stances seems contradictory.


UN decision over Japan’s ‘island’ claim shows justice
By Zhong Sheng (People’s Daily)
16:32, May 18, 2012


Edited and Translated by People’s Daily Online

The U.N. Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS) has decided not to adopt Japan’s claim of an outer continental shelf based on Okinotori Atoll, meaning that the country cannot classify the atoll as an island to illegally expand waters under its jurisdiction, according to a statement recently published on the website of the United Nations. The commission has maintained the international maritime order and safeguarded international justice by performing its duties in a fair and independent way.

It matters much whether Okinotori Atoll can be classified as an island. According to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, an island can have the territorial sea, contiguous zone, exclusive economic zone (EEZ), and continental shelf, while rocks that cannot sustain human habitation or economic life of their own shall have no EEZ or continental shelf. Any attempt to illegally expand territorial waters simply based on an atoll will seriously damage the fair and reasonable international maritime order.

Okinotori is an atoll in the western Pacific Ocean far away from Japan, but the country has insisted that it is an island, which is entitled to a continental shelf and an EEZ covering more than 100,000 square kilometers. Over the past 30 years, Japan has spent heavily fortifying the atoll and creating artificial facilities there, in order to develop the area into island status.

Shockingly, Japan submitted to the CLCS information on the limits of a continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles from the baselines of Okinotori Atoll in November 2008, in an attempt to take advantage of the commission to seek legitimacy and international recognition for its illegal claim.

Japan’s illegal claim has unsurprisingly received strong opposition from the international community. After Japan’s submission of its claim to the CLCS, China and South Korea have repeatedly expressed their concerns to the U.N. secretary-general, and clearly noted that Japan’s claim of an outer continental shelf based on Okinotori Atoll violates international law, and damages the interests of the entire international community. The two countries have called for the commission to ignore Japanese claims over the geopolitical classification of Okinotori Atoll.

After nearly four years of deliberation and investigation, the commission decided not to adopt Japan’s claim, saying that before the concerns of China and South Korea are solved, it cannot take action on Japan’s claim regarding the atoll. The fair and reasonable decision is a de facto rejection to Japan’s illegal claim, and serves the overall interests of the international community.

Japan is unwise in its attempt to practice deception when knowing that it cannot hide the truth, untrustworthy to flagrantly violate the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea as a contracting state, and is unethical to damage the interests of the international community for its own benefits. No wonder its illegal claim failed to gain international recognition.

Oceans connect the world’s five continents and various civilizations. A fair and reasonable international maritime order is of great significance to maintaining international peace and stability and promoting global prosperity and development. Japan should abide by international norms, and give up its illegal claims. International justice will not permit Okinotori Atoll to be classified as an island.

Read the Chinese version:国际正义不许冲之鸟变礁为“岛”
 
Last edited:
. .
Lol, that's amazing! You guys are just as anal as us in making the impossible, possible. :lol:

What can i say. We're very , very, very similar. LOL!!!

Its in the East Asian bloodline, i guess... ;)

I thought it was China who fiercely opposed Japan establishing its EEZ by contstructing artificial island/building in okinotorishima.

I don't know how China could justify building artifical island in SCS to claim EEZ surrounding the sea. These two stances seems contradictory.


UN decision over Japan’s ‘island’ claim shows justice
By Zhong Sheng (People’s Daily)
16:32, May 18, 2012


Edited and Translated by People’s Daily Online

The U.N. Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS) has decided not to adopt Japan’s claim of an outer continental shelf based on Okinotori Atoll, meaning that the country cannot classify the atoll as an island to illegally expand waters under its jurisdiction, according to a statement recently published on the website of the United Nations. The commission has maintained the international maritime order and safeguarded international justice by performing its duties in a fair and independent way.

It matters much whether Okinotori Atoll can be classified as an island. According to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, an island can have the territorial sea, contiguous zone, exclusive economic zone (EEZ), and continental shelf, while rocks that cannot sustain human habitation or economic life of their own shall have no EEZ or continental shelf. Any attempt to illegally expand territorial waters simply based on an atoll will seriously damage the fair and reasonable international maritime order.

Okinotori is an atoll in the western Pacific Ocean far away from Japan, but the country has insisted that it is an island, which is entitled to a continental shelf and an EEZ covering more than 100,000 square kilometers. Over the past 30 years, Japan has spent heavily fortifying the atoll and creating artificial facilities there, in order to develop the area into island status.

Shockingly, Japan submitted to the CLCS information on the limits of a continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles from the baselines of Okinotori Atoll in November 2008, in an attempt to take advantage of the commission to seek legitimacy and international recognition for its illegal claim.

Japan’s illegal claim has unsurprisingly received strong opposition from the international community. After Japan’s submission of its claim to the CLCS, China and South Korea have repeatedly expressed their concerns to the U.N. secretary-general, and clearly noted that Japan’s claim of an outer continental shelf based on Okinotori Atoll violates international law, and damages the interests of the entire international community. The two countries have called for the commission to ignore Japanese claims over the geopolitical classification of Okinotori Atoll.

After nearly four years of deliberation and investigation, the commission decided not to adopt Japan’s claim, saying that before the concerns of China and South Korea are solved, it cannot take action on Japan’s claim regarding the atoll. The fair and reasonable decision is a de facto rejection to Japan’s illegal claim, and serves the overall interests of the international community.

Japan is unwise in its attempt to practice deception when knowing that it cannot hide the truth, untrustworthy to flagrantly violate the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea as a contracting state, and is unethical to damage the interests of the international community for its own benefits. No wonder its illegal claim failed to gain international recognition.

Oceans connect the world’s five continents and various civilizations. A fair and reasonable international maritime order is of great significance to maintaining international peace and stability and promoting global prosperity and development. Japan should abide by international norms, and give up its illegal claims. International justice will not permit Okinotori Atoll to be classified as an island.

Read the Chinese version:国际正义不许冲之鸟变礁为“岛”


It is allowed and has already been ratified by the Japanese Government, based on International Law through the
Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf. It is no longer a dispute, the entire region is part of Japanese Maritime Territory.

Anyways, that is old news, lol.

Here's some updates for you:

Japan Takes Large Southern Extension of Continental Shelf | The Diplomat


Japan, literally, has one of the largest maritime territories in the world. :)

For your information:

iuchi2new[1].jpg



617px-EEZ_of_Japan_01[1].png
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom