What's new

Japan eyes major military policy shift that would allow land strikes in China

DavidsSling

BANNED
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Messages
829
Reaction score
0
Country
Israel
Location
Australia
Months before he announced his resignation, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe set in motion a policy change that could for the first time allow Japan’s military to plan for strikes on land targets in China and other parts of Asia.

Japan’s Self Defence Forces are geared toward stopping attackers in the air and the sea.

The policy change would direct the military to create a doctrine for targeting enemy sites on land - a mission that would require the purchase of long-range weapons such as cruise missiles.

If adopted by the next government, the policy would mark one of the most significant shifts in Japan’s military stance since the end of World War II.

Deepening concern
It reflects Abe’s longstanding push for a more robust military and Tokyo’s deepening concern about Chinese influence in the region.

The Japanese government is worried by China’s increased military activity around the disputed East China Sea islets.

“The main reason for our action is China. We haven’t really emphasised that too much, but the security choices we make are because of China,” Masahisa Sato, a lawmaker from Abe’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party who has served as a deputy defence minister and a deputy foreign minister, said in an interview.

Japanese PM Shinzo Abe set in motion changes to military policy.

Outgoing Japanese PM Shinzo Abe set in motion changes to military policy. Credit: AP

Japan renounced its right to wage war after World War II, making the issue of striking targets on land - which would entail attacks on foreign soil - contentious for its Asian neighbours, particularly China.

‘The security choices we make are because of China.’
Abe said last month he was stepping down because of worsening health.

Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga, who is seen as less hawkish than Abe but is closely aligned with him, is expected to win the race to replace him as party leader and become premier.

Abe instructed senior defence policymakers in June to come up with LDP proposals for the military that included a land-attack, or strike, doctrine.

Revised defence strategy
That proposal will become government policy if it is included in a revised national defence strategy, which appears likely, according to two insiders, including LDP acting Secretary-General Tomomi Inada.

“I don’t think there is much opposition to it in the LDP,” Inada told Reuters.

“That direction doesn’t change even with a new prime minister.”

The military can already use long-range missiles to strike ships.


It considers such plans justified because it needs to be able to destroy weapons threatening Japan.

The land-attack proposal is framed using the same reasoning, according to former defence minister Itsunori Onodera.

Therefore, proponents say, Japan’s laws will not need to change.

During his eight years in office, Abe pushed for but failed to achieve his goal of revising the post-war constitution’s pacifist Article 9.

US-made BGM-109 Tomahawk cruise missiles would be an option for land-attack weapons, said Katsutoshi Kawano, who until last year was Japan’s most senior military officer, the Chairman of Self Defence Forces Chief of Staffs.

China in range
Tomahawks can hit targets 2500km away. That would put most of China and much of the Russian Far East within range.

“Japan could probably have strike capability within five years,” Kawano said.

“A full strike package including targeting satellites and electronic warfare components would, however, be far more expensive and take more than 10 years to acquire.”

‘Japan could probably have strike capability within five years.’
But a change in military strike policy could meet resistance from the LDP’s coalition partner, the Buddhist-backed Komeito, which worries such a move would antagonise China and threaten Japan’s war-renouncing constitution.

“It could spark an arms race and raise tension. It would be technically difficult and would require huge investment,” Komeito leader Natsuo Yamaguchi said in an interview.

 
. .
No country can afford to sit and wait for a potential opponent to keep striking while it keeps defending so it would seem logical for Japan to relook its strategy. I think the main issue would the opposition to it from within Japan and its neighbors given its WWII history.
 
.
japan won't go to war with china over india. the most japan will do is send a few medic teams.
 
.
No country can afford to sit and wait for a potential opponent to keep striking while it keeps defending so it would seem logical for Japan to relook its strategy. I think the main issue would the opposition to it from within Japan and its neighbors given its WWII history.

They think China is Hesbollah or Syrian Government who afraid to lay their hand on Israel, just because their hands are already full with the civil war. Firing some Tomahawk to China will bring missiles exchange that can cause a whole destruction to entire Japan. It's not worth it. It's no longer a World War 2 situation, when China was in a very long civil war situation. Nor Manchurian era, where Qing dynasty was already become the shell of it's former glory, thanks to a very huge civil war such Taiping Rebellion.
 
Last edited:
.
Japan's main enemy is north Korea, which is hell bent to annihilate Japan. China is Japan's biggest trading partner. Japan's territorial dispute in mainly with Russia and south Korea to lesser extent.
 
.
We very much expect Japan, Indonesia, Vietnam and India to unite against China.
 
.
We very much expect Japan, Indonesia, Vietnam and India to unite against China.

There is no reason for that to happen. a few mountain peaks and a few uninhabited islands are not worth it. it will take a while for the chinese communist leadership to understand
 
Last edited:
.
There is no reason for that to happen. a few mountain peaks and a few uninhabited islands are not worth it. it will take a while for the chinese communist leadership to understand
When Indian leaders will understand it?
 
.
There is no reason for that to happen. a few mountain peaks and a few uninhabited islands are not worth it. it will take a while for the chinese communist leadership to understand
We really want revenge, but we don't have some reason.So it's great that these countries have come out against us.
 
. . .
.
No, India is, China has 14 land neighbors, India is the only one that China has active land dispute with but India does with every neighbor.


China has a long land border and has 14 neighboring countries in total : Afghanistan, Bhutan, India, Kazakhstan, North Korea, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Mongolia, Myanmar (Burma), Nepal, Pakistan, Russia, Tajikistan, and Vietnam.

You have maritime island disputes with all South East Asian countries and Japan

India has no territorial disputes with anyone other than Pakistan or China
 
.
You have maritime island disputes with all South East Asian countries and Japan
Every country in SCS has their own version of maps, but it doesn't stop them being good neighors enjoying peace and stability, it's not China disputes them, it's everyone disputes everyone there.
China didn't fire a single shot on her borders for 40 years, how many shots India fired and how many people killed because of border conflicts?
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom