Islamic State fell behind in technology. Got butchered by white skinned westerners.

[C130]

Ultron, they never had the technological advantage. they have better tactics and courage.

If Russia/SAA/Hezbollah can keep this up they'll break IS morale and their backs.

 

[mike2000 is back]

Ultron, they never had the technological advantage. they have better tactics and courage.

If Russia/SAA/Hezbollah can keep this up they'll break IS morale and their backs.

But Russia/Hezbollah/SAA/Shia militias etc are not fighting just ISIS, in fact their main attacks has been against the FSA and any group opposing Assad in Syria. The Syrian conflict is much more complex than ISIS vs the rest. Every player just uses ISIS as a prostitute/slut i.e used them to achieved their objectives and win public support(PR purposes). Lol
ISIS is just one piece of a much larger cake.

 

[C130]

But Russia/Hezbollah/SAA/Shia militias etc are not fighting just ISIS, in fact their main attacks have been against FSA and any group opposing Assad in Syria. The Syrian conflict is more complex than ISIS vs the rest. Every player just uses ISIS as a prostitute/slut i.e used them to achieved their objectives and win public support(PR purposes). Lol
ISIS is just one piece of a much larger cake.

anyone that is against SAA is a rat terrorist.

 

[mike2000 is back]

anyone that is against SAA is a rat terrorist.

Of course. Same as Mubarak, Ben Ali etc were saying all those who rose up against them were Terrorist as well.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

Of course. Same as Mubarak, Ben Ali etc were saying all those who rose up against them were Terrorist as well.

Those dick-tators were helped to stay in power by none other than the west..

 

[mike2000 is back]

Those dick-tators were helped to stay in power by none other than the west..

Lol What about Assad,Fat Kim dynasty, Mugabe, Abdulaziz Bouteflika, Gadaffi, Castro dynasty etc? Also aided by the West?
The West has no choice other than to deal with each country's leaders(whether dictator or not) except you expect us not to have any relations whatsoever with these country's(which is not feasible in today's world).. The people usually get the government they deserve, if they are not happy with their leaders to a certain extent they will rebel and revolt, PERIOD.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

Lol What about Assad,Fat Kim dynasty, Mugabe, Abdulaziz Bouteflika, Gadaffi, Castro dynasty etc? Also aided by the West?
The West has no choice other than to deal with each country's leaders(whether dictator or not) except you expect us not to have any relations whatsoever with these country's(which is not feasible in today's world).. The people usually get the government they deserve, if they are not happy with their leaders to a certain extent they will rebel and revolt, PERIOD.

Google about Assads father.

Even saddam was supported by west.. his chemical weapons came from france.

Or Idi Amin who was propped up by UK.

Gadaffi had USSR to back him up amd so did other communists like castro etc.

 

[mike2000 is back]

Google about Assads father.

Even saddam was supported by west.. his chemical weapons came from france.

Or Idi Amin who was propped up by UK.

Gadaffi had USSR to back him up amd so did other communists like castro etc.

Assad's father was supported by France I already know that, he tuned out to be a brutal ruthless dictator just like his son,but France or any foreign power isn't responsible for the conduct/behaviour of another country's president, its not like it's France who told him to massacre and oppress his own people just like it's not Russia or Iran who is telling Assad jr to kill his own people who rose up against him or you can't blame the Soviets for Castro's ir Kim's brutal regime of fear etc. They are responsible for their own actions.

Reason I said these dictators will be toppled by their people if their people are not happy with them. Many dictators also come to power by circumstances(military coups/internal power struggles. Etc) foreign powers like U.S, U.K, France,Russia are just external factors who have to influence or deal with this for their interests like every power does which is normal.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

Assad's father was supported by France I already know that, he tuned out to be a brutal ruthless dictator just like his son,but France or any foreign power isn't responsible for the conduct/behaviour of another country's president, its not like it's France who told him to massacre and oppress his own people just like it's not Russia or Iran who is telling Assad jr to kill his own people who rose up against him or you can't blame the Soviets for Castro's ir Kim's brutal regime of fear etc. They are responsible for their own actions.

There is a difference between supporting and propping up of helping dictators remain in power!

Western nations have always helped dictators come to power for their own national interests!

Better to deal with a dick-tator propped up or installed,consolidated (power) than a National Assembly.

Reason I said these dictators will be toppled by their people if their people are not happy with them. Many dictators also come to power by circumstances(military coups/internal power struggles. Etc) foreign powers like U.S, U.K, France,Russia are just external factors who have to influence or deal with this for their interests like every power does which is normal.

And they always look at west for recognition, to legitimise their coups, dont they?

Please stop trying to spin or twist facts into fiction.

Even in Pak, military rulers have always looked up to west (US) to support them/recognition.

Ayub Khan,Zia,Musharaf all were supported by west. Infact they received more aid than any civilian govt.

 

[mike2000 is back]

There is a difference between supporting and propping up of helping dictators remain in power!

Western nations have always helped dictators come to power for their own national interests!

Better to deal with a dick-tator propped up or installed,consolidated (power) than a National Assembly.


And they always look at west for recognition, to legitimise their coups, dont they?

Please stop trying to spin or twist facts into fiction.

Even in Pak, military rulers have always looked up to west (US) to support them/recognition.

Ayub Khan,Zia,Musharaf all were supported by west. Infact they received more aid than any civilian govt.

So you mean all your past and even recent military leader's/dictators were put in power by the West?lol Seems you are alleging your country is some sort of banana republic(which I don't believe so) or something. If the West can install majority of your leaders at will(which I don't believe is the case), what does that say about your country? You make it seem like the Westbis some sort of GOD who can install any leader in the world as they please.lol

Some people should stop blaming the West (or Russia or Iran for that matter) and assume their responsibilities .

As I said foreign powers can't be blamed for the actions of some dictators, using your logic you will blame Soviet Russia for propping up Kim and castro dynasty and many other communist dictators in central Asia right? You will blame Iran and Russia for supporting and propping up dictator Assad massacring his people, isn't it?
For me I don't see it that way, these countries are merely protecting their interests and to do so they ought to deal with the government in place, same with western powers. This can be seen in Egypt, they bring an important country we had to deal with their leader Mubarak, then later after the uprisings we had to deal with Morsi and after another uprising we are now dealing with SISI, we will deal with any other leader that takes over him, it's up to Egyptians to decide.

 

[Awan68]

U f ucking mofo stupid hick, isis is not the decendant of the former glorious islamic empries, ur so stupid 8 dont even knw how to reply to u, it seems ur legendary idiocy has left me speechless.

 

[Flash_Ninja]

Islamic State is the caliphate reborn. Islamic State flies the flag of Muhammad. Islamic State is the only one that is not a puppet of white skinned westerners. So Islamic State is a threat to white skinned westerners.

Are you high? what are you going on about?

 

[MultaniGuy]

ISIS do not represent Islam.

ISIS are terrorists and criminals who are going to go to hell.

 

[gangsta_rap]

Islamic State is the caliphate reborn.

In some ways you are acting as an apologist for the terrorist group DAESH if you're going to agree and spread their view that they are a legitimate incarnation of the next Caliphate.

 

[ultron]

But Russia/Hezbollah/SAA/Shia militias etc are not fighting just ISIS, in fact their main attacks has been against the FSA and any group opposing Assad in Syria. The Syrian conflict is much more complex than ISIS vs the rest. Every player just uses ISIS as a prostitute/slut i.e used them to achieved their objectives and win public support(PR purposes). Lol
ISIS is just one piece of a much larger cake.

FSA is their enemy. FSA will be destroyed. They are dogs of America just like SAA is dogs of Russia. They are all dogs of white skinned westerners.