ISI trickery: Pakistan sent top Indian MHA officials on holiday in Murree when terror struck Mumbai

[jaunty]

Just did an image search!

I can't believe anyone would stoop to this !!!

This is a picture of Khandala in Maharashtra, India!!!

Ha ha I knew it as soon as I saw the pic.

Also our very own fox news (arnab) had it as the first newshour debate today

I have met him in real life and he is a very intelligent person. It's amazing how much he has to dumb himself down to sell his program to the hyper-nationalist crowd. But he is doing a great job at it and taking home perhaps the biggest paycheck in Indian news media so he won't complain.

 

[Tripoli]

Ha ha I knew it as soon as I saw the pic.



I have met him in real life and he is a very intelligent person. It's amazing how much he has to dumb himself down to sell his program to the hyper-nationalist crowd. But he is doing a great job at it and taking home perhaps the biggest paycheck in Indian news media so he won't complain.

Check post no 33. I have corrected the stupid, careless mistake.

 

[Dawood Ibrahim]

Breaking news MHA contain super heroes like batman superman but they didn't bother to save the day they were happy in Muree

 

[Blue Marlin]

Pity, really. Hate handing these out; takes me right back to school.

so im guessing you were a teacher. well in that case you should have finished him.

 

[Joe Shearer]

so im guessing you were a teacher. well in that case you should have finished him.

Four years.

Since you mention it, I've run my classes on a few principles:

1. People must read up the assigned reading list before coming to class; no spoon-feeding, not for post-grads;
2. During class, people will be given opportunities to display what they know; what they don't know is a matter that comes out during tiny little quizzes held every now and then;
3. Dissent is encourage, but it has to be reasoned and argued dissent, not just publicity seeking to impress the girls;
4. Dumb insolence will be punished but in a passive manner; you get less and less attention;
5. Exam questions seek short answers to the point; rambling is discouraged;
6. Every question is answered by me, and set aside in confidence, before the exam, and answers are benchmarked against those 'ideal' answers (not infrequently, students' answers have been better than mine);
7. Every retort is encouraged, in the hope that it will turn out to be the point at which intelligent questioning of the unquestionable will start, but there is always the shambling Neanderthal who confuses bad manners with smart behaviour, and have to be executed swiftly and cleanly, but not in such a manner as to cause permanent harm.

Having read this lot, the unhappy thought occurs that this is more or less how I behave on PDF, except when I am bored and out of sorts and inclined to mischief.

 

[Blue Marlin]

Four years.

Since you mention it, I've run my classes on a few principles:

1. People must read up the assigned reading list before coming to class; no spoon-feeding, not for post-grads;
2. During class, people will be given opportunities to display what they know; what they don't know is a matter that comes out during tiny little quizzes held every now and then;
3. Dissent is encourage, but it has to be reasoned and argued dissent, not just publicity seeking to impress the girls;
4. Dumb insolence will be punished but in a passive manner; you get less and less attention;
5. Exam questions seek short answers to the point; rambling is discouraged;
6. Every question is answered by me, and set aside in confidence, before the exam, and answers are benchmarked against those 'ideal' answers (not infrequently, students' answers have been better than mine);
7. Every retort is encouraged, in the hope that it will turn out to be the point at which intelligent questioning of the unquestionable will start, but there is always the shambling Neanderthal who confuses bad manners with smart behaviour, and have to be executed swiftly and cleanly, but not in such a manner as to cause permanent harm.

Having read this lot, the unhappy thought occurs that this is more or less how I behave on PDF, except when I am bored and out of sorts and inclined to mischief.

1. spoon feeding for undergrads is very high. the tutur will nevr give you the answer but will only guide you somtimes they will stay with you for hours. i remember him telling me was was in uni till 10pm helping 1 person. post grads will be the same but tutors wont stay beyond the alloted time

2. same here in the uk. you will be given the oppertunity to show what you can do others can learn from it too. quizzes? no only the occasional test followed by the semester tests.

3. not here theres not many girls back then whilst doing software engineering

4. happens here too makes them feel un wanted and guilty forcing them to work hard or get lost.

5.same here but waffeling is ok to an extent

6. answers must have keypoints. tutors will looks for these. and mark accoridingly also papers are moderated by independant examiner. students see the paper and have the right to question the marking and will be looked at.

7. it depends on who you have as a tutor. sometimes the tutor will lets it go if between fellow students and between the tutor but some tutors wont have ny of it and will ask you to leave.

i like to get upto no good when bored too, it happens to all of us really

point 6 is a good one and my favourite. from what i can see your a no non-sense straight up tutor who pushes his students alot. thats what you need. more importantly thats what the students need

 

[Joe Shearer]

1. spoon feeding for undergrads is very high. the tutur will nevr give you the answer but will only guide you somtimes they will stay with you for hours. i remember him telling me was was in uni till 10pm helping 1 person. post grads will be the same but tutors wont stay beyond the alloted time

2. same here in the uk. you will be given the oppertunity to show what you can do others can learn from it too. quizzes? no only the occasional test followed by the semester tests.

3. not here theres not many girls back then whilst doing software engineering

4. happens here too makes them feel un wanted and guilty forcing them to work hard or get lost.

5.same here but waffeling is ok to an extent

6. answers must have keypoints. tutors will looks for these. and mark accoridingly also papers are moderated by independant examiner. students see the paper and have the right to question the marking and will be looked at.

7. it depends on who you have as a tutor. sometimes the tutor will lets it go if between fellow students and between the tutor but some tutors wont have ny of it and will ask you to leave.

i like to get upto no good when bored too, it happens to all of us really

point 6 is a good one and my favourite. from what i can see your a no non-sense straight up tutor who pushes his students alot. thats what you need. more importantly thats what the students need

I don't think it worked.

I left twenty years of software engineering management (left software itself soon enough, as that reprobate Oscar showed us all, while the rest of these unfriendly SOBs rolled in the aisles laughing their stupid selves into stitches) to teach, and it didn't do much for me.

Partly it was the bad influence of a management school embedded in a law school of great eminence. Two bad effects: the law kids (they do a five year course, soon after school, joint BA and LLB) look down on the management kids; the management kids think they've done everybody a great favour by getting into the BSchool: now all they'd have to do is to hang in there until the four semesters were over and walk into a million rupee a year jobs.

My marking didn't go down well. They represented that against me in the feedback forms. They didn't like my pushing them either, and it didn't work to remind them that the outside world would treat them approximately an order of magnitude further worse.

 

[Blue Marlin]

I don't think it worked.

I left twenty years of software engineering management (left software itself soon enough, as that reprobate Oscar showed us all, while the rest of these unfriendly SOBs rolled in the aisles laughing their stupid selves into stitches) to teach, and it didn't do much for me.

Partly it was the bad influence of a management school embedded in a law school of great eminence. Two bad effects: the law kids (they do a five year course, soon after school, joint BA and LLB) look down on the management kids; the management kids think they've done everybody a great favour by getting into the BSchool: now all they'd have to do is to hang in there until the four semesters were over and walk into a million rupee a year jobs.

for me i have my own firm so im cool and reasonably sized. most people are into pharmacy/medical, law and accounting. people who do software either work for rockstar and some other firm making well known global gaming engine which i forgot the name of. either that or bae systems which i recall you worked there too. business students end up doing random jobs.

My marking didn't go down well. They represented that against me in the feedback forms. They didn't like my pushing them either, and it didn't work to remind them that the outside world would treat them approximately an order of magnitude further worse.

exactly!!! in the second year our tutors were brutal to iron out the softies.
in the end you did good. and it was for their benefit

 

[SecularNationalist]

Another proof RAW is full of bunch of incompetent fools sucking the money of indian tax payer.

 

[Joe Shearer]

Another proof RAW is full of bunch of incompetent fools sucking the money of indian tax payer.

Agree with you 100%.

Next time some trouble-making idiot says that RAW did this and RAW did that, may I quote you and shut them up?