What's new

Is this serious as Hafiz Saeed is acquitted in one FIR and will this impact FATF?

FATF has nothing to do with reality. The watchdog doesn't know about Indian financing to Baloch militants?



Freedom fighters targeting an illegal occupying force (e.g. the Nazis in occupied France) have generally not been called terrorists by any sane people/power. The UK and US fully supported the resistance movement and romanticized the saboteur because he was fighting tyranny and a draconian Nazi occupation.

Of course the occupier, and those who need the occupier to try and counter a rising China, will call freedom fighters terrorists. It doesn't mean that they are :)

They have my respect and I hope they keep taking on and getting rid of occupying scum.



FATF is a joke. But it's a real joke. We need to deal with it in a different way and continue doing what we need to protect our own interests.
Keep calling them freedom fighters, it at the end helps us.
 
Keep calling them freedom fighters, it at the end helps us.

It's not about calling them freedom fighters.

Anybody who fights against an illegal, draconian occupying force is, by definition, a freedom fighter.

You would be a freedom fighter if a group occupied your house against your land, disappeared your brother, abused your mother and you decided to fight for your freedom against the occupier.

This situation is not about territory anymore, per se --- it is probably about water, extracting a cost and keeping hundreds of thousands of troops tied up (obviously since the people are SO HAPPY about being occupied, you need such few army/paramilitary there, right?).
 
well we cant punish him without any proof or legal substance. He is in UN designated terror list bcz of Indian manipulation not bcz he was actually a culprit. Indians needed a scapegoat for their security failure so they targeted a pro Kashmiri activist. Last point will remain unfulfilled bcz it is a direct interference in our internal matters.
 
Back
Top Bottom