What's new

Is India's Hindu Right Getting More Assertive?

Doesn't matter everything proves your preoccupation with two-nation theory. Movies, oranges, saffron clothes etc. :sarcastic::sarcastic:

has never been an issue for me or the place where I come from. My district Gujranwala in punjab was 75 % muslim dominated even before 1947 so neither me nor any of my ancestors have ever lived in hindu dominated societies. But it is an issue for those muslims who live or have migrated into pakistan from hindu dominated areas of india.

Even you are among-est the best! :cheesy:

Best in the sense of representing the mind of their nation. There is a forum for example called pakpassion which is expatriate leftist pakistanis and totally unrepresentative of the mind of pakistani nation.
 
.
has never been an issue for me or the place where I come from. My district Gujranwala in punjab was 75 % muslim dominated even before 1947 so neither me nor any of my ancestors have ever lived in hindu dominated societies. But it is an issue for those muslims who live or have migrated into pakistan from hindu dominated areas of india.

Right I can't understand Pakistani logic when Punjab, Bengal, Sindh and NWFP were Muslim dominated with Muslim dominated provincial governments, then how Hindus were not going to allow them to follow their culture and religion freely. :laugh::laugh:
 
.
Right I can't understand Pakistani logic when Punjab, Bengal, Sindh and NWFP were Muslim dominated with Muslim dominated provincial governments, then how Hindus were not going to allow them to follow their culture and religion freely. :laugh::laugh:

Living under British colonial and living under hindu (whom people in my area always considered lower) regimes are two totally different issues.
 
.
Living under British and living under hindu (whom people in my area always considered lower) regimes are two totally different issues.

India was Hindu majority so obviously the Prime Minister was going to be Hindu as people voted for Nehru. But how come this was going to affect the the cultural lives of four Muslim majority provinces when Hindus never dominated in provincial politics as Pakistanis usually exaggerates.
 
.
If Hindu rashtra realizes under the guidance of great great knicker wearing Mahodayas from Nagpur, Gujarat and elsewhere:then in another 50 years, we'll be posting(if pdf still existed) here about how secular and free was our country, posting photos of discos, bars, streets with women wearing revealing dresses- before and after(RSS-ization) images.
that's because, Hindu terrorism is no different to Islamic terrorism. the aim of both is to go back to past. in case of Hindutva, it is 7000 years old "great civilization" , other is to go medieval "golden era". fanatics are the same.
Here we have missionaries at work posting their disgust of other religions in disguise. Btw, this world has seen ages of christian terrorism so you better not speak out of your butt. And, don't worry people are rather happy living with their pasts rather than falling to your idiotic missionary tactics.

Btw, because of act of people like you, the likes of dara singhs come after you..
 
Last edited:
.
India was Hindu majority so obviously the Prime Minister was going to be Hindu as people voted for Nehru. But how come this was going to affect the the cultural lives of four Muslim majority provinces when Hindus never dominated in provincial politics as Pakistanis usually exaggerates.

To have a Hindu ruling over us in any form was meant to be a huge insult to our proud egos, that was not acceptable.
 
.
We don't need enemies, as we have Secular Political Parties & Paid Media who are hell bound to destroy our very existence - Bas India may Muslims ki sunvaye hai Thx.. to 20 % vote share........:tdown:
Disgraceful but true.... Muslims issues are given more coverage than any other minority..... I have not seen a single sensible news media documentary on other religious minority except Muslims though i am not against the media highlight on ill treatments of Muslim anywhere in,the country......
i believe let media play its unnecessary communal tone we should be undeterred to raise our voice on social media platforms to tell the truth not hatreds at all.....
 
.
To have a Hindu ruling over us in any form was meant to be a huge insult to our proud egos, that was not acceptable.

Every Pakistani give his own fancy reasons to creation of Pakistan and other says they didn't want to separate from India but claim Congress forced the league. India was Hindu majority so Parliament was going to dominated by Hindus and PM will be a Hindu. What's with this conflicting logic Muslims didn't want to be ruled by Hindus and Muslims League didn't want to separate from India. :wacko:
 
.
To have a Hindu ruling over us in any form was meant to be a huge insult to our proud egos, that was not acceptable.
On sensible note some day you might be able to save your religion but not humans or human values if you continue to think like that.....
Ask any poor is he proud of being poor who fights hard to his hunger misery n poverty in a country which is ruled by his own people of same religion....? You might feel an insult if non Muslim rule but certainly not with when you people are also going thru misery in your country with being Islamic Republic.....
Have some sense dear.... Your hatred has made you blind to see real truth of human life.....
Be human first then a pakistani then a Muslim......
 
. .
Every Pakistani give his own fancy reasons to creation of Pakistan and other says they didn't want to separate from India but claim Congress forced the league. India was Hindu majority so Parliament was going to dominated by Hindus and PM will be a Hindu. What's with this conflicting logic Muslims didn't want to be ruled by Hindus and Muslims League didn't want to separate from India. :wacko:

I told you those whose ancestors have migrated from areas situated in modern day india need all these logics , we the native people of pakistan don't need any kind of logic to prove the existence of our nation or nationality.............

Suppose if british had left our areas as part of india in 1947 and we were at the mercy of some hindu dominated government in delhi, then sooner or later a militant movement for independence would have started in muslim dominated areas of Punjab, KPK and Balochistan just on the pattern of Kashmir independence movement..........................

We would have got our independence from india anyway but perhaps we would have been seperate states of punjab, kpk and balochistan instead of one country that we are today. The only area about which I am doubtful is Sindh , the culture of sindhi muslims seems to lack that muslim ego characteristics that are found in muslims of punjab, kpk and balochistan.........

So it could be that sindh might have happily lived under india but I cannot say anything with surity about sindh province and its native people they are very mysterious people, we hardly know anything about them compared to other ethnic groups who are much more expressive about their views and inclinations........
 
.
Here we have missionaries at work posting their disgust of other religions in disguise.
Since, I am not supporting Haindava fanatism, I am branded as a missionary so as to fit the imagination of a Christian enemy by some fanatic Hindus in this forum. I have no problems! I know the RSS bhasha, it's often repeated across the threads. Let be clear, I am not a religious hater, but correctly understands the agendas of fascist groups who are Infidel haters.
 
. .
Since, I am not supporting Haindava fanatism, I am branded as a missionary so as to fit the imagination of a Christian enemy by some fanatic Hindus in this forum. I have no problems! I know the RSS bhasha, it's often repeated across the threads. Let be clear, I am not a religious hater, but correctly understands the agendas of fascist groups who are Infidel haters.

Didn't you claim genetic test of Harvard Medical School as Hindutva propaganda. :girl_wacko::omghaha::omghaha:
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom