Iranian Power plants in Syria taking shape..Turbines have arrived.

[aryobarzan]

Iran builds power plant in western Syria
Sunday, 08 August 2021 PressTV

Iranian gas turbines arrive in the western Syrian province of Latakia on August 8, 2021. (Photo by Syrian Arab News Agency)
Iran has started building a power plant in the western Syrian province of Latakia as part of the Islamic Republic’s bid to help the Arab country rebuild itself after more than of a decade of foreign-imposed war.
On Sunday, it was reported that a number of gas turbines had been shipped to the province in line with Iran’s efforts to carry out the project.
Pictures circulated across the social media showed the huge equipment entering Latakia using heavy transport vehicles.
Iran’s Mapna Group, a sprawling industrial conglomerate, has been tasked with implementing the project.

Back ground : reported on Sept ,2017
BEIRUT - Syria's government signed a contract with an Iranian company on Tuesday to import five gas-fired power plants to the war-battered city of Aleppo, in an early sign of the major role Tehran is expected to play in Syria's reconstruction.

The deal, reported by Syria's state news agency SANA, is part of a broader understanding reached by Damascus and Tehran promising Iranian companies contracts to restore electrical infrastructure in Syria, Electricity Minister Zuhair Kharboutli said during a visit to Tehran.

The Aleppo contract was awarded to the Iranian firm MAPNA and is valued at around 130 million euros, according to a Kharboutli statement carried Sunday by SANA.

Kharboutli also signed memorandums with Iranian Energy Minister Sattar Mahmoudi promising to import five plants to provide 540 megawatts of electricity to the coastal Latakia province, as well as to build wind and solar plants, and to restore plants in Deir el-Zour and Homs.

 

[Amin Bactria]

pakistan should do the same and iran also should get rid of most of the damaging dams and create more clean and sustainable power domestically aswell because the liberal agenda doesnt work their power production destroys the land itself dams dont work most of the time they are damaging thermal underground energy gives limited energy and it gives huge damage and generally most of these concepts are proven to be more damaging than useful
the whole concept of energy consumption and production has to be taken out of these idiotic ruinous agendas and thought about in future more serious because we are stuck in a mess if things continue like this
i dont with iran to follow these selfish and ruinous agendas as turkey did and i dont want more floods and fires and droughts to hit iran so things have to change and taken away from the liberal agenda and factionalism to the islamic revolutionary agenda which is iranian agenda aswell because it is the only sustainable thing out there for us to chose since nobody else has solutions and only repeats failures its a global problem this issue really the entire world is moving into the wrong direction for way to long and it has to change

 

[Hack-Hook]

pakistan should do the same and iran also should get rid of most of the damaging dams and create more clean and sustainable power domestically aswell because the liberal agenda doesnt work their power production destroys the land itself dams dont work most of the time they are damaging thermal underground energy gives limited energy and it gives huge damage and generally most of these concepts are proven to be more damaging than useful
the whole concept of energy consumption and production has to be taken out of these idiotic ruinous agendas and thought about in future more serious because we are stuck in a mess if things continue like this
i dont with iran to follow these selfish and ruinous agendas as turkey did and i dont want more floods and fires and droughts to hit iran so things have to change and taken away from the liberal agenda and factionalism to the islamic revolutionary agenda which is iranian agenda aswell because it is the only sustainable thing out there for us to chose since nobody else has solutions and only repeats failures its a global problem this issue really the entire world is moving into the wrong direction for way to long and it has to change

those dams protect you from floods.
if you want to knew what make floods stydy how zagross and alborz jungle get destroyed , how the rise in average earth temperature and effect such as global warming made havoc in our environment, go study about green house gases

 

[Amin Bactria]

those dams protect you from floods.
if you want to knew what make floods stydy how zagross and alborz jungle get destroyed , how the rise in average earth temperature and effect such as global warming made havoc in our environment, go study about green house gases

70% of irans dams were build without planning for the enviroment this rafsanjani did that exact thing these dams damage the enviroment they are badly constructed in some cases and generally the idea that dams would benefit the enviroment is absurd it can only be that case if all studies on the negatives are done for the geographic location the dams is supposed to be build and when the positives far outweight the negatives which is often not the case in fact dams create wars these days so thinking that internally building dams like crazy as the liberals did would help is crazy its a reason for drought earthquakes and generally it doesnt help much anyway

those dams protect you from floods.
if you want to knew what make floods stydy how zagross and alborz jungle get destroyed , how the rise in average earth temperature and effect such as global warming made havoc in our environment, go study about green house gases

no dams cause floods what protects against floods is flood walls and intelligently placed flood gates to stop flooding of population areas but dams cause floods they already accumilate alot of water which wouldnt be there to begin with dams cause rivers to become broader and therefore the entire riverbed is also changing itself its a whole mess if its done all over the place as some would like to do and like rafsanjani did in iran

 

[SalarHaqq]

70% of irans dams were build without planning for the enviroment this rafsanjani did that exact thing these dams damage the enviroment they are badly constructed in some cases and generally the idea that dams would benefit the enviroment is absurd it can only be that case if all studies on the negatives are done for the geographic location the dams is supposed to be build and when the positives far outweight the negatives which is often not the case in fact dams create wars these days so thinking that internally building dams like crazy as the liberals did would help is crazy its a reason for drought earthquakes and generally it doesnt help much anyway

no dams cause floods what protects against floods is flood walls and intelligently placed flood gates to stop flooding of population areas but dams cause floods they already accumilate alot of water which wouldnt be there to begin with dams cause rivers to become broader and therefore the entire riverbed is also changing itself its a whole mess if its done all over the place as some would like to do and like rafsanjani did in iran

Also global warming is a debatable topic, which is used as a device by dominant powers in order to force the Paris Agreement on developing nations, knowing that it tends to hamper their industrial growth. Guess which party in Iran is pressing for a ratification of said agreement? That's right, the usual suspects ie liberals (reformists & centrists/moderates). Luckily, the revolutionary establishment has to date successfully resisted this.

 

[Hack-Hook]

Also global warming is a debatable topic, which is used as a device by dominant powers in order to force the Paris Agreement on developing nations, knowing that it tends to hamper their industrial growth. Guess which party in Iran is pressing for an adoption of said agreement? That's right, the usual suspects ie liberals (reformists & centrists/moderates). Luckily, the revolutionary establishment has to date successfully resisted this.

Guess what . Paris agreement ask developed countries to reduce their emission not developing ones.
Didn't believed one day I see you support trump.

 

[Muhammed45]

Well done MAPNA

 

[SalarHaqq]

Guess what . Paris agreement ask developed countries to reduce their emission not developing ones.
Didn't believed one day I see you support trump.

And since when did Trump invent or hold a patent on any of the notions I mentioned? He was simply a latecomer to this and other topics, in addition to being an impostor given that his main function was to advance the zionist geopolitical agenda while attracting the vote of a certain half of the American electorate and working towards controlled polarization of US society. Once his job was accomplished, he got ditched and anti-globalist measures he took simply reversed at the stroke of a pen.

Here's one of the prominent gurus of global warming changing his mind about the alarmist predictions he had made - four years before most people knew who Trump is:

https://web.archive.org/web/20130403055305/http://worldnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/04/23/11144098-gaia-scientist-james-lovelock-i-was-alarmist-about-climate-change

As for the Paris Agreement, it sure does require developing nations to reduce emissions. It represents a departure from the 1997 Kyoto Protocol insofar as it blurs the distinction between developing and industrialized nations. To this effect wealthy countries have committed to mobilize funds in order to push through so-called mitigation and adaptation in developing nations.

Source: the globalist Wikipedia.

 

[Amin Bactria]

Guess what . Paris agreement ask developed countries to reduce their emission not developing ones.
Didn't believed one day I see you support trump.

iran should not be part of any paris agreement its as simple as that because this agreement should be signed between g7 exclusively and why would iran have to do kneel infront of globalist demands to begin with they have nothing to say aslong as they dont fix themselves and their actions and the same is true about fatf and alot of other issues

 

[Hack-Hook]

iran should not be part of any paris agreement its as simple as that because this agreement should be signed between g7 exclusively and why would iran have to do kneel infront of globalist demands to begin with they have nothing to say aslong as they dont fix themselves and their actions and the same is true about fatf and alot of other issues

because global warming is world concerns its not like it only happen in g7 countries .just look at Iran southern region i'm from Ahvaz and I don't recall 63 degree celicious weather when i was child

And since when did Trump invent or hold a patent on any of the notions I suggested? He was simply a latecomer to this and other topics, in addition to being an impostor given that his main function was to advance the zionist geopolitical agenda while attracting the vote of a certain half of the American electorate and promoting some controlled social polarizations in US society. Once his job was accomplished, he got ditched and anti-globalist measures he took simply reversed at the stroke of a pen.

Here's one of the prominent global warming gurus changing his mind about his alarmist predictions, 5 years before most people knew who Trump is:

https://web.archive.org/web/20130403055305/http://worldnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/04/23/11144098-gaia-scientist-james-lovelock-i-was-alarmist-about-climate-change

As for the Paris Agreement, it sure does require developing nations to reduce emissions. It represents a departure from the 1997 Kyoto Protocol insofar as it blurs the distinction between developing and industrialized nations. To this effect wealthy countries have committed to mobilize funds in order to push through so-called mitigation and adaptation in developing nations.

View attachment 773233

View attachment 773234

Source: the globalist Wikipedia.

your pages say it the countries must set a goal above Kyoto protocol and well nobody force them to state set a specific goal and considering the difference between developing countries goal with developed countries goal in Kyoto protocol,.......
do I need to say it more clearly

 

[SalarHaqq]

because global warming is world concerns its not like it only happen in g7 countries .just look at Iran southern region i'm from Ahvaz and I don't recall 63 degree celicious weather when i was child

This doesn't prove much. Climatic cycles and temperature changes have been a natural phenomenon since the formation of Earth.

your pages say it the countries must set a goal above Kyoto protocol

In other terms, the Paris Agreement does indeed require developing nations to reduce therir emissions. So the notion that it doesn't ask them to do so (which you previously asserted) is not correct. Good to have this established.

and well nobody force them to state set a specific goal

It's enough that parties to the treaty will be bound to set consecutive targets, each having to be more restrictive than the previous one. Iran is a sovereign nation-state and will not transfer even an ounce of her self-determination to international organizations, nor submit herself to verification mechanisms under the control of supra-national foreign entities which in fact are pursuing a globalist agenda.

Especially when the reasons evoked to entice nations into abandoning sovereignty in such a manner, are themselves subject to scientific controversy and debate.

- - - - -

iran should not be part of any paris agreement its as simple as that because this agreement should be signed between g7 exclusively and why would iran have to do kneel infront of globalist demands to begin with they have nothing to say aslong as they dont fix themselves and their actions and the same is true about fatf and alot of other issues

Indeed, and beyond the mentioned aspects all these treaties present a second eminent danger: they are, in fact, conceived by their architects as step by step measures whose ultimate goal is to make independent states abandon their sovereignty, nations to give up their self-determination and transfer these to a unified one world government tasked with carrying out global governance.

In practice, this would imply the death of Iran as a nation and civilization, and also the end of Islam as a distinct religion. The same fate would befall every other historically rooted nation, civilization and religion. All would get dissolved into this "new world order" dominated by the current globalist oligarchy made of banksters and other cut-throat capitalists, higher degree freemasons and international zionists.

The entire humanist, progressist and scienticist-positivist demagogy produced by these elites is there to mislead the masses of ordinary subjects. The latter are alienated from their true beings by the depraved ways of life these same rulers intduced through social engineering. Beneath the seemingly attractive and apparently rational words and narratives we hear from these dominants powers-to-be, it is in fact a completely sinister, morally corrupt, anti-human / anti-specist, totalitarian, unjust and oppressive sort of rule they intend to subject us to, akin to slavery in its worst form.

The ideological, philosophical and metaphysical / esoteric underpinnings of this global totalitarianism are resolutely rooted in freemasonry and Noahide, pseudo-Judaic messianism. This project stands in complete contradiction with both natural law and the precepts of Islam. And its agents in Iran are the reformists and centrists/moderates, in addition to the exiled Iranian opposition. Consciously or unconsciously, these elements are working around the clock to implement the globalist agenda in Iran.

 

[aryobarzan]

How did we go from "Power plants for Syria" to "global warming"....lol

side note: Chian is gearing up to enter Syrian economy big time...Iran and Russia paid the price to save Syria and China wants to collect the payouts...something not right here!!!

 

[Hack-Hook]

This doesn't prove much. Climatic cycles and temperature changes have been a natural phenomenon since the formation of Earth.

never this fast and the global warming deniers has no alternative answer

In other terms, the Paris Agreement does indeed require developing nations to reduce therir emissions. So the notion that it doesn't ask them to do so (which you previously asserted) is not correct. Good to have this established.

but its also stablished they themselves must put a target and nobody force them to do a select target . it can be even 1% above Tokyo protocol which practically was zero .
if they don't want to reduce their emission even one percent in the next 30 years then they are going to remain in 19th century while other plan for 22th century . sorry but in my book such country deserve to remain a backward country for the eternity, sorry to be blunt it deserve to get colonized by others who think of the future

It's enough that parties to the treaty will be bound to set consecutive targets, each having to be more restrictive than the previous one. Iran is a sovereign nation-state and will not transfer even an ounce of her self-determination to international organizations, nor submit herself to verification mechanisms under the control of supra-national foreign entities which in fact are pursuing a globalist agenda.

Especially when the reasons evoked to entice nations into abandoning sovereignty in such a manner, are themselves subject to scientific controversy and debate.

well its seems we are willing to subject our nuclear technology to restrictions that nobody else has to then why not restrict emission to the degrees far less than what others will do.

by the way the monitoring will be done from space and it will be done no matter you want it or not.

How did we go from "Power plants for Syria" to "global warming"....lol

side note: Chian is gearing up to enter Syrian economy big time...Iran and Russia paid the price to save Syria and China wants to collect the payouts...something not right here!!!

when you can't deliver some body else will step in. what's not right there.

 

[Hack-Hook]

This doesn't prove much. Climatic cycles and temperature changes have been a natural phenomenon since the formation of Earth.



In other terms, the Paris Agreement does indeed require developing nations to reduce therir emissions. So the notion that it doesn't ask them to do so (which you previously asserted) is not correct. Good to have this established.



It's enough that parties to the treaty will be bound to set consecutive targets, each having to be more restrictive than the previous one. Iran is a sovereign nation-state and will not transfer even an ounce of her self-determination to international organizations, nor submit herself to verification mechanisms under the control of supra-national foreign entities which in fact are pursuing a globalist agenda.

Especially when the reasons evoked to entice nations into abandoning sovereignty in such a manner, are themselves subject to scientific controversy and debate.

- - - - -



Indeed, and beyond the mentioned aspects all these treaties present a second eminent danger: they are, in fact, conceived by their architects as step by step measures whose ultimate goal is to make independent states abandon their sovereignty, nations to give up their self-determination and transfer these to a unified one world government tasked with carrying out global governance.

In practice, this would imply the death of Iran as a nation and civilization, and also the end of Islam as a distinct religion. The same fate would befall every other historically rooted nation, civilization and religion. All would get dissolved into this "new world order" dominated by the current globalist oligarchy made of banksters and other cut-throat capitalists, higher degree freemasons and international zionists.

The entire humanist, progressist and scienticist-positivist demagogy produced by these elites is there to mislead the masses of ordinary subjects. The latter are alienated from their true beings by the depraved ways of life these same rulers intduced through social engineering. Beneath the seemingly attractive and apparently rational words and narratives we hear from these dominants powers-to-be, it is in fact a completely sinister, morally corrupt, anti-human / anti-specist, totalitarian, unjust and oppressive sort of rule they intend to subject us to, akin to slavery in its worst form.

The ideological, philosophical and metaphysical / esoteric underpinnings of this global totalitarianism are resolutely rooted in freemasonry and Noahide, pseudo-Judaic messianism. This project stands in complete contradiction with both natural law and the precepts of Islam. And its agents in Iran are the reformists and centrists/moderates, in addition to the exiled Iranian opposition. Consciously or unconsciously, these elements are working around the clock to implement the globalist agenda in Iran.

honestly I can't relate with you here , wonder how you reach to the conclusion that protecting environment will destroy our sovereignty is beyond my understanding. if you want to be part of the future world you must play by some rule . its like the story of the people in a boat and the one who drill it. here every one s familiar with it as its the favorite story of the preachers when they want to say you can't say I don't want to be religious and you don't say anything to me and have your religion for yourself. they say if we let it be so the society will be like a boat who one want to make a hole in it , it will sank.
let apply that logic here

 

[SalarHaqq]

never this fast and the global warming deniers has no alternative answer

Supposedly this only applies to the last few millennia. But, a few millennia are nothing much at the scale of Earth's entire existence. When viewed from that prism, much quicker temperature changes have occurred in the past.

but its also stablished they themselves must put a target and nobody force them to do a select target . it can be even 1% above Tokyo protocol which practically was zero .

And no reversal is possible at any point time, since every goal voluntarily set by a participating nation must go farther than the previous one.

Also, if the treaty does not bind its signatories in any manner, then there's no point in ratifying it. Any measure deemed necessary could then be taken without being party to the treaty. The point of the Paris Agreement is to force developing nations to forego their industrial development goals and submit to international control mechanisms ie to so-called global governance, which is a way to neutralize domestic resistance against this diktat and to gradually put an end to national sovereignty.

Let me quote Edmond de Rothschild: "The lock which must be blown now, is the nation."

if they don't want to reduce their emission even one percent in the next 30 years then they are going to remain in 19th century while other plan for 22th century .

They're going to take strides in terms of industrial development while those who set limits on their emissions will lag behind.

sorry but in my book such country deserve to remain a backward country for the eternity, sorry to be blunt it deserve to get colonized by others who think of the future

So it's either the globalist way or the highway? To me colonization is a crime which cannot be justified by the contention that the victim conducted wrong policies. Two wrongs do not make a right, as the saying goes. But rest assured, with the strengthening of the industrial base comes expansion of military might and therefore deterrence against colonialists.

well its seems we are willing to subject our nuclear technology to restrictions that nobody else has to then why not restrict emission to the degrees far less than what others will do.

I feel obliged to reiterate: two wrongs don't make a right. And, in my view it's a mistake to restrict nuclear technology. However, it's not exactly as if the stakes were the same: the west is not (yet) threatening Iran with sanctions and "other options on the table" if it does not comply with their wishes in the ecological realm; when it comes to the nuclear file however, it does issue such threats and puts them into practice as far as sanctions are concerned. Hence, it's not quite the same.

by the way the monitoring will be done from space and it will be done no matter you want it or not.

Globalists believe nobody can stand in their way. As former French president Sarkozy infamously declared: "We will go together towards this New World Order, and nobody will be able to prevent it."

But hard luck for these globalists elites: Iran is not going to ratify their environmental instrument, hence they can monitor all they want, it will not have any impact on what Iran does.

when you can't deliver some body else will step in. what's not right there.

Exactly. Which is why Islamic Iran must keep resisting these globalist schemes. Else they will step in and deprive Iran not just of her sovereignty, but of her very existence.

honestly I can't relate with you here , wonder how you reach to the conclusion that protecting environment will destroy our sovereignty is beyond my understanding. if you want to be part of the future world you must play by some rule .

Rules defined by a cabal of loan sharks, freemasons and zionists? I'd rather not, to be honest... I'd rather go under fighting them to my last breath than letting them suppress and uproot me. Because that's what they're aiming for.

its like the story of the people in a boat and the one who drill it. here every one s familiar with it as its the favorite story of the preachers when they want to say you can't say I don't want to be religious and you don't say anything to me and have your religion for yourself. they say if we let it be so the society will be like a boat who one want to make a hole in it , it will sank.
let apply that logic here

This oppressive cabal will be brought down. It will not be allowed to end mankind as it plans to (look up anti-specism, transhumanism, man-animal chimeras currently being experimented on with support from the oligarchy). If you want to be on the winning side, you better not play by their rules, even if they seem invincible. The battle for haqq has often if not always been against powers which seemed invincible.