What's new

Iran launches advanced Jamaran destroyer

Abi, please explain. How did the text you pasted ended up with the figure of 14,000 tonnes while your link states its 1420 tonnes.

I already explained on the first page that it was a typo by pressTV and i said myself that it is 1400 tons. They must have corrected their typo.
 
.
I already explained on the first page that it was a typo by pressTV and i said myself that it is 1400 tons. They must have corrected their typo.
You should then correct it in your original post as well.

Take care about such specific details, next time.
 
.
Abi, Jamaran can't be a destroyer. Its way too small. Its too small to be even a frigate. And due to its limited size, its firepower will also be limited. Even in terms of firepower, i think this ship is only comaprable to a heavy corvette or very light frigate.

It is a frigate. Journalists don't know anything about the military. Just yesterday, the BBC showed a video of an APC and called it a Tank. The journalists just used a dictionary and literally translated as a Destroyer in English. This is a frigate and the Iranian Navy has said this already in Persian.

By the way, there is nothing wrong with its' firepower, it has a SAM system with a range of at least 32km, . It also has anti-ship missiles with a range of 200km. That is more firepower than the F-22p.
 
.
You should then correct it in your original post as well.

Take care about such specific details, next time.

I was very specific. I clearly said that it was a typo. I didn't notice that they edited their post untill now.
 
.
Now how are people going to "save face" with you "spelling things out" for them? :what::azn:

Are you going to change your name to "Dr. Khan" now? Don't forget he first and foremost earned his right to talk.

All of us will be better off if we did more and said less - if for no other reason but the fact that those with fingers on the buttons for war pay attention to what you have, and not what you say you have.

With that in mind, adeos and best wishes.

:cheers:

They said it to give an indication that we posses AD systems that they don't know about. Just to put off their military planners. I am sure that we will soon see an Iranian version of the S300 and it will either be the S300 or the HQ-10. Russia and China (especially China) want Iran to have the system, but would also don't want the political backlash, so it only makes sense. |Claiming that we can build our only only reinforces this possibility.
 
. . .
Some more pictures:





02e241f244a0f881fffc02e086fb195c.jpg








31347f81987ddf105007bf4f6113a85d.jpg


212c5f9df30d442499623f0938706cf7.jpg
 
.
02e241f244a0f881fffc02e086fb195c.jpg


d72f99af3c916bd6d2894b4bf6e38b19.jpg


edd81f7af27eee7ef3031bc068c54fa7.jpg


77243934d2a24a0688bd566cd6bcec64.jpg


afb1a77db75d2bea7446404cd36af548.jpg


3890b28fd316d7b71c1569e44ed1e972.jpg




 

Attachments

  • 3890b28fd316d7b71c1569e44ed1e972.jpg
    3890b28fd316d7b71c1569e44ed1e972.jpg
    184 KB · Views: 29
  • afb1a77db75d2bea7446404cd36af548.jpg
    afb1a77db75d2bea7446404cd36af548.jpg
    171.9 KB · Views: 27
  • 77243934d2a24a0688bd566cd6bcec64.jpg
    77243934d2a24a0688bd566cd6bcec64.jpg
    173.7 KB · Views: 25
  • edd81f7af27eee7ef3031bc068c54fa7.jpg
    edd81f7af27eee7ef3031bc068c54fa7.jpg
    141.7 KB · Views: 24
  • d72f99af3c916bd6d2894b4bf6e38b19.jpg
    d72f99af3c916bd6d2894b4bf6e38b19.jpg
    124.5 KB · Views: 25
  • 02e241f244a0f881fffc02e086fb195c.jpg
    02e241f244a0f881fffc02e086fb195c.jpg
    108 KB · Views: 27
. . .
Thx for the pic's ... but in all due respect wat maks this ship so advanced?
 
.
It has a SAM with a range of at least 32km and and Anti-ship missiles with the range of 200km. That makes it more capable than the F-22P which has a SAM with a 6km range , and i would consider it advanced.

There are also plans to add the FM-90 (which Iran produces domestically) to it as well.
 
.
I have compared it. It's best SAM system has a range of 6km. Iran's has a range of at least 32KM. Our AShM has a range of 200km, much more than what the F-22P carries.

I have already said on this forum that it is not a destroyer and no one has claimed this. It is a case "lost in translation". It is a frigate. The generic word "warship" in Persian could be translated to mean "destroyer" and that is what a journalist who knows nothing about the military has used the word Destroyer instead of the word Frigate.
 
.
It has a SAM with a range of at least 32km and and Anti-ship missiles with the range of 200km. That makes it more capable than the F-22P which has a SAM with a 6km range , and i would consider it advanced.

There are also plans to add the FM-90 (which Iran produces domestically) to it as well.

And when did i co compare it with the f-22p .. sorry but your fig's are wrong bro it is not advanced at all homework time for u although my congrats to Iran.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom