What's new

Invasion of India: Doc

Personally I think India should have never been partitioned but remain a British Colony to this day Positives no wars over Kashmir,
Bangladeshi wouldn't have to hop the borders, both hindu and muslim extremists would have been blowing themselves against the british colonists but in short it would have kept the peace.
Oh how ignorant you are, it was exactly because of them that we have been divided, heard divide and rule policy much?
 
.
Personally I think India should have never been partitioned but remain a British Colony to this day Positives no wars over Kashmir,
Bangladeshi wouldn't have to hop the borders, both hindu and muslim extremists would have been blowing themselves against the british colonists but in short it would have kept the peace.

What happened can not be changed now. But at least we should know our facts n grounds and make our future n building on it. Not on some fake n lies.
 
.
Oh how ignorant you are, it was exactly because of them that we have been divided, heard divide and rule policy much?

Of course it was a final term policy they used it in Africa, Asia, the ME but the people of India Pakistan Bangladesh would have been better under British rule now you guys have italian rule.
 
.
What other countries "do you personally think should have remained British colonies???"
Personally I think India should have never been partitioned but remain a British Colony to this day Positives no wars over Kashmir,
Bangladeshi wouldn't have to hop the borders, both hindu and muslim extremists would have been blowing themselves against the british colonists but in short it would have kept the peace.
 
.
Personally I think India should have never been partitioned but remain a British Colony to this day Positives no wars over Kashmir,
Bangladeshi wouldn't have to hop the borders, both hindu and muslim extremists would have been blowing themselves against the british colonists but in short it would have kept the peace.

I am happy we got separated and forever got rid of an unstable territory.
 
. . . . .
Of course it was a final term policy they used it in Africa, Asia, the ME but the people of India Pakistan Bangladesh would have been better under British rule now you guys have italian rule.
Actually only one thing which happened due to Britishers is the Unification of India.. rest is bullshit, even a bird wants to free, hunted or not.
 
. .
zimbabwe did you know it was considered the bread basket of africa Under colonist rule ?
it wasn't that bad even after independence when the whites owned the lands. Things took a turn for the worse when the lands were grabbed forcefully and given to Mugabe's supporters. A gradual change like how it is happening in South Africa would have been much better.
 
.
Actually only one thing which happened due to Britishers is the Unification of India.. rest is bullshit, even a bird wants to free, hunted or not.

Not to mention build infrastructure get food to fund the empire, suppress the Muslim-Hindu conflicts. in long term South Asia would have been more stable under British then what it is today.
 
. .
it wasn't that bad even after independence when the whites owned the lands. Things took a turn for the worse when the lands were grabbed forcefully and given to Mugabe's supporters. A gradual change like how it is happening in South Africa would have been much better.

In short the final product to say was that once great economic countries took a downturn.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom