What's new

India's Strategic Advance Into Burma


Yes, NUKES. India first conceptualised about nukes under Homi J. Bhaba who was later assasinated by CIA. Then India tested nukes in 1972 called Laughing Buddha in Pokhran, then again in 1998.

Nuclear physics is a level of science with which you bangladeshis are yet to be acquainted. It requires intelligence, infrastructure, money and years of research to master nuclear science. We will talk once bangladesh becomes nuclear.

What are you talking about mate? Bangladesh is completely controlled by RAW. We will soon have SAARC minus Pakistan. Burma too will probably be part of this grouping. In foreign policy, the tack has changed from engaging with Pakistan to diplomatically isolating Pakistan, especially within South Asia. And, despite media talk there is really no Agenda against China, unless border issues heat up. As long as status quo is maintained and players respect international law, there is no problem.

China does not respect anybody, don't be under any illusion. If China sees profit then tomorrow they will oenly betray and sell out Pakistan to the highest bidder. USA saved China from Japan. Read about the atrocities the Japanese did on Chinese civilians. China should have been grateful, instead they killed US soldiers in Korean war and are engaged in an intense political rivalry with US.

India has had ancient relations with China since days of Asoka. But don't think China has the same feeling of friendship. They are ruthless politicians. They see only their own profit. They used USSR, and once they got what they wanted they betrayed USSR in the Afghanistan war.

China cannot be trusted.

Some communities in north eastern India have their origins in SEA just like many north Indians have their origin in Central Asia. India should forget aman ka tamasha and focus on building relations with Thailand, Vietnam etc. During Chola era India had spread its culture in the region. Thanks to these marxist traitors in India today India cannot even focus on their culture at home.
 
China does not respect anybody, don't be under any illusion. If China sees profit then tomorrow they will oenly betray and sell out Pakistan to the highest bidder. USA saved China from Japan. Read about the atrocities the Japanese did on Chinese civilians. China should have been grateful, instead they killed US soldiers in Korean war and are engaged in an intense political rivalry with US.

India has had ancient relations with China since days of Asoka. But don't think China has the same feeling of friendship. They are ruthless politicians. They see only their own profit. They used USSR, and once they got what they wanted they betrayed USSR in the Afghanistan war.

China cannot be trusted.

Some communities in north eastern India have their origins in SEA just like many north Indians have their origin in Central Asia. India should forget aman ka tamasha and focus on building relations with Thailand, Vietnam etc. During Chola era India had spread its culture in the region. Thanks to these marxist traitors in India today India cannot even focus on their culture at home.

Err.. We are not saints in the matter of foreign policy, mate.. This is realpolitik. Sometimes nations collaborate. Sometime they compete. If we sit foolishly, the world will ride roughshod over us. Nobody can be trusted. If you trust, you are simply an idiot. China single-mindedly follows its national interests. So does US. This should be emulated by us.
 
Err.. We are not saints in the matter of foreign policy, mate.. This is realpolitik. Sometimes nations collaborate. Sometime they compete. If we sit foolishly, the world will ride roughshod over us. Nobody can be trusted. If you trust, you are simply an idiot. China single-mindedly follows its national interests. So does US. This should be emulated by us.

That's my whole argument, we are not saints. So it is foolish to expect that Chinese love us because we love them. They don't want us that is why they armed pakistan with missiles, nukes, aircraft etc. That is why they are building navy bases all over Indian ocean. China sees India as a future threat and rival. India needs to change its policy with regards to China. Modi is doing a good job, engage both US and Japan. If USA wants a navy base in Andaman let them have it, let China also know fear.
 
India is at the bottom of the nuclear nations.Perhaps Israel has more, but those are v potent.India's nukes are said to be outdated gone rusty.Delivery system is poor/unreliable.The command mechanism is pathetic with politicians and bureaucrats involved to delay and complicate things all the way.
We don't need Nukes when it comes to Bangldesh, we only need to release Brahmaputra River during Monsoon Season and all Bangladeshis will be swimming in Bay of Bengal along with the Sharks.:laughcry:
 
We don't need Nukes when it comes to Bangldesh, we only need to release Brahmaputra River during Monsoon Season and all Bangladeshis will be swimming in Bay of Bengal along with the Sharks.:laughcry:
No worries dude. Their all weather Chinese are working on that.
 
India is at the bottom of the nuclear nations.Perhaps Israel has more, but those are v potent.India's nukes are said to be outdated gone rusty.Delivery system is poor/unreliable.The command mechanism is pathetic with politicians and bureaucrats involved to delay and complicate things all the way.

Do you even know how many nuclear states are there? Guess you never realsied that Japan is also a nuclear state. As for nuclear weapons states then India is not at the bottom, and nuclear deterrence is kept at a minimum. You are naive about these things, like I said we talk when bangladesh goes nuclear.

And who said India's nukes are outdated? Do you even know what you are talking about?

A nuke is not a watermelon you put on a stall. Nuclear devices are designed to stay put for decades if not for centuries. We are not talking about 155mm artillery shells here. There is the nuclear core which is mated to the delivery platform at the last minute. At least do some research before spouting gibberish.

A country's nuclear options are kept secret. Nobody knows for sure how many nukes a country has. Estimates, and I hope you have heard about the term estimate, are made on the number of nuclear reactors a country has and the amount of yellow cake it produces. Despite the name cake, it is not an eatable. Countries with higher yellow cake have a theoretical advantage of producing more nukes because they have more raw material. How fast you can process the cake into weapons grade uranium is another criteria. Based on that estimates are made how many nukes each country has. The number could be accurate and could be wrong.

No country will declare their nuclear assets. And in a democracy the nuclear button is always with the PM or the President. And there is a deliberate reason why so many protocols have to be followed before launching a nuke. A nuke is not a hand grenade.

Unless you have personally inspected India's nukes and delivery system your opinion counts for nothing.
 
Last edited:
Do you even know how many nuclear states are there? Guess you never realsied that Japan is also a nuclear state. As for nuclear weapons states then India is not at the bottom, and nuclear deterrence is kept at a minimum. You are naive about these things, like I said we talk when bangladesh goes nuclear.

And who said India's nukes are outdated? Do you even know what you are talking about?

A nuke is not a pomegranate you put on a stall. Nuclear devices are designed to stay put for decades if not for centuries. We are not talking about 155mm artillery shells here. There is the nuclear core which is mated to the delivery platform at the last minute. At least do some research before spouting gibberish.

A country's nuclear options are kept secret. Nobody knows for sure how many nukes a country has. Estimates, and I hope you have heard about the term estimate, are made on the number of nuclear reactors a country has and the amount of yellow cake it produces. Despite the name cake, it is not an eatable. Countries with higher yellow cake have a theoretical advantage of producing more nukes because they have more raw material. How fast you can process the cake into weapons grade uranium is another criteria. Based on that estimates are made how many nukes each country has. The number could be accurate and could be wrong.

No country will declare their nuclear assets. And in a democracy the nuclear button is always with the PM or the President. And there is a deliberate reason why so many protocols have to be followed before launching a nuke. A nuke is not a hand grenade.

Unless you have personally inspected India's nukes and delivery system your opinion counts for nothing.
Dude, I see what you did there.:D That's clever:enjoy:
 
Dude, I see what you did there.:D That's clever:enjoy:

That was unintentional. I did not mean the Pakistani guy, he and I both had some debates but he is a decent chap. I have not seen him troll or use profanities in his posts.

But I think I will edit that to some other fruit. Last thing I want is for somebody to shout foul.
 
Yes, NUKES. India first conceptualised about nukes under Homi J. Bhaba who was later assasinated by CIA. Then India tested nukes in 1972 called Laughing Buddha in Pokhran, then again in 1998.

Nuclear physics is a level of science with which you bangladeshis are yet to be acquainted. It requires intelligence, infrastructure, money and years of research to master nuclear science. We will talk once bangladesh becomes nuclear.

A country can buy an atomic bomb and paint it though !

Some one here once said, "Embrace China !" If I remember correctly.
 
A country can buy an atomic bomb and paint it though !

Some one here once said, "Embrace China !" If I remember correctly.

Having an atom bomb does not solve anything. North Korea has a nuke but it is still poor. It cannot use the nuke in anger and its threats are not even taken seriously. A nuke is a threat, or at best a last resort weapon. Cities are wiped out by a single nuke within seconds. It is not called WMD for nothing. No sane country will use that in a war. US and USSR chose to lose face by facing defeat in Vietnam and Afghanistan rather than use the nuke.
 
Back
Top Bottom