India's Harrappan city Dholavira is now an UNESCO World Heritage

[Taimoor Khan]

You should be happy the world is realizing the greatness of ancient Indian civilizations.

There is nothing Indian about IVC. It's called Harrapan for a reason, a site firmly within Pakistan, and west towards this particular site, which is inline with evolution of IVC, starting from westerns banks of Indus , mehrgarh in Baluchistan, then spilling into eastern banks with Mohenjodaro and harappa, and then expanding the empire into what is you call India now.

Yes.
This means UNESCO and hence UN is recognising India's connection to Harrapa (IVC).

All its saying that's it's a Harrapan outpost, a ancient city of Pakistan which now lies within India. Only goes show the borders and expansion of ancient greater Pakistan.

 

[ProudPak]

Stop attention whoring

India was a name given to you puppets by the British and you cuckolds gladly took it from your masters.

Sindhu is the ancient name for the indus, we still have sindh and we have the indus, etymologically IVC is all of pakistan. We are the inheritors of this great civilisation

You are busy in revisionism for your scraps and illigetimacy.

Modern day india and indians are simply barstards trying to seek legitimacy from the original daddies , but we really dont want to know u. You are an illegitimate child

Now go away, you are not our child, we just had a one night stand with some darkie dravidian near the ganges and you are a product of that.

Now shoo

Bitch slapping has a new level

 

[Varunastra]

There is nothing Indian about IVC. It's called Harrapan for a reason, a site firmly within Pakistan, and west towards this particular site, which is inline with evolution of IVC, starting from westerns banks of Indus , mehrgarh in Baluchistan, then spilling into eastern banks with Mohenjodaro and harappa, and then expanding the empire into what is you call India now.


All its saying that's it's a Harrapan outpost, a ancient city of Pakistan which now lies within India. Only goes show the borders and expansion of ancient greater Pakistan.

Was Harrapa their capital city?

 

[El Sidd]

Dholavira seems to have defied nature by making smart use of water to sustain such large inhabitants concentrated over the course an entire year. The settlement predates the nearest port city in yet another interesting twist.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1419956677579886592

What's the historical name of the city? Dholavira is not the historical name of it as per locals.

 

[Taimoor Khan]

Was Harrapa their capital city?

It's a harrapan city, an extension of harappa, Pakistan. It's not just you lot, but our reach was far west as well.

Shortugai - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

According to Bernard Sergent, "not one of the standard characteristics of the Harappan cultural complex is missing from it"

 

[Varunastra]

It's a harrapan city, an extension of harappa, Pakistan. It's not just you lot, but our reach was far west as well.

Shortugai - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

According to Bernard Sergent, "not one of the standard characteristics of the Harappan cultural complex is missing from it"

Was Harappa the capital city?

 

[SABRE]

Don't these Indians also claim that Mohenjodaro civilization is Indian? LOL

It is Indian, whereas much of the modern day India is not actually "India." Only the Indian Punjab, Rajasthan and Gujarat can claim to be parts of Indus Valley Civilisation. Greeks/Macedonians called the land of Indus "India." They never crossed into beyond what is now Pakistan.

 

[Goenitz]

I think India can name anything they want, if its not a copyright issue.

 

[El Sidd]

Was Harappa the capital city?

of what? Greater Sindh?

Will Bhuttos inherit the keys to the port city of Somnath?

 

[Taimoor Khan]

Was Harappa the capital city?

You are asking a silly question which there is no answer. What you should look at and understand, that evolution of IVC started WITHIN the domain of Pakistan and expanded east and west both. What you see in India, is the expansion of that great civilisation and empire.

 

[Varunastra]

You are asking a silly question which there is no answer. What you should look at and understand, that evolution of IVC started WITHIN the domain of Pakistan and expanded east and west both. What you see in India, is the expansion of that great civilisation and empire.

The capital belonging to a particular place is what might give some semblace of "nationality". That not being present makes it both Indian and Pakistani. Even if I consider that Pakistani sites were the first and the people later moved eastward, that also gives Indians the right to claim the civilization as they are basically the same people.

 

[Ghost Hobbit]

There is nothing Indian about IVC. It's called Harrapan for a reason, a site firmly within Pakistan, and west towards this particular site, which is inline with evolution of IVC, starting from westerns banks of Indus , mehrgarh in Baluchistan, then spilling into eastern banks with Mohenjodaro and harappa, and then expanding the empire into what is you call India now.


All its saying that's it's a Harrapan outpost, a ancient city of Pakistan which now lies within India. Only goes show the borders and expansion of ancient greater Pakistan.

It's called Harappan because railway engineers accidentally discovered it first. The people there are actually more dravidian if anything. In any Pak is a part of Indian civilizational heartland, so I don't see a contradiction over there.

You are asking a silly question which there is no answer. What you should look at and understand, that evolution of IVC started WITHIN the domain of Pakistan and expanded east and west both. What you see in India, is the expansion of that great civilisation and empire.

Actually there is an answer...niether is it the biggest city nor is it the oldest. In Pakistan will you name an entire civilization around abbotabad when both Lahore and Karachi are present?

 

[Taimoor Khan]

The capital belonging to a particular place is what might give some semblace of "nationality". That not being present makes it both Indian and Pakistani. Even if I consider that Pakistani sites were the first and the people later moved eastward, that also gives Indians the right to claim the civilization as they are basically the same people.

Not really. In Pakistan brief history, capital has moved from Karachi to Islamabad. Lahore is much ancient city then Karachi yet its Karachi which is the economic hub. BUT all the happening within the dominion of Pakistan. You need to look at IVC with same perspective. It was build by ancient Pakistanis who expanded it both east and west of Indus river. And it happened everywhere. Other two, Babylon and Egypt also originated around Euphrates and Nile. The ORIGIN, and original people is the most and only important thing. Rest are just byproducts.

 

[Ghost Hobbit]

Not really. In Pakistan brief history, capital has moved from Karachi to Islamabad. Lahore is much ancient city then Karachi yet its Karachi which is the economic hub. BUT all the happening within the dominion of Pakistan. You need to look at IVC with same perspective. It was build by ancient Pakistanis who expanded it both east and west of Indus river. And it happened everywhere. Other two, Babylon and Egypt also originated around Euphrates and Nile. The ORIGIN, and original people is the most and only important thing. Rest are just byproducts.

It was build by ancient Indians who spread it all across the Indus valley after firmly establishing it in Rakhigari.

 

[Taimoor Khan]

It's called Harappan because railway engineers accidentally discovered it first. The people there are actually more dravidian if anything. In any Pak is a part of Indian civilizational heartland, so I don't see a contradiction over there.

You are uneducated and ignorant Indian buffon. Origin of IVC are firmly within the dominion of Pakistan. It's all started around mehrgarh in Baluchistan FAR away from India, then to Mohenjodaro/harrapa, then it expanded further east into what is now India.

Actually there is an answer...niether is it the biggest city nor is it the oldest. In Pakistan will you name an entire civilization around abbotabad when both Lahore and Karachi are present?

Read above.

And what is biggest and oldest? Oldest is Mehrgarh, the oldest human settlement in world, in Pakistan. Biggest? Well only 10% of Mohenjodaro and Harrapa is ever excavated.

What is important and undisputed, is the origin of IVC , in Pakistan. Hell it's called Indus for a reason.

It was build by ancient Indians who spread it all across the Indus valley after firmly establishing it in Rakhigari.

That's bullshit. IVC origin are firmly established within Pakistan. India is just its expansion. Hence the reason for the pursuit of greater Pakistan.