What's new

Indian Union Muslim League today dubbed Bilawal Bhutto Zardari as one of the "daydreamers" in pak

micky

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Dec 21, 2013
Messages
213
Reaction score
0
Country
India
Location
India
attached image

2014-09-21_16-05-00.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 2014-09-21_16-05-00.jpg
    2014-09-21_16-05-00.jpg
    279.9 KB · Views: 37
"Muslims of India will never anybody to reduce the numerical strength of muslim population of India..."

That's a classic example of doing the right thing for the wrong reasons. So his interest in the defending territorial integrity of Indian land is to protect the numerical strength of his community?

On another note, I hope Pakistanis also put an end to dynastic politics, as Indians have (seemingly) done. Bilawal Bhutto was 19 years old when his mother was assassinated, and he had spent the previous 9 years out of the country. How can such a rootless person represent Pakistani people? Unfortunately, he is the heir apparent, because of who his mom and dad were. We in India know only too well, the dangers of electing somebody for that reason, or having a large party controlled by such people.
 
^^^^I am enjoying the conversation more than the stupid Indian Muslim League story ..
fight.fight..fight.. :pop:
 
They never taught you about that, did they?
yeah because its irrelevant anyways the question is why do Indian Muslims still after partition need a separate party to represent them :coffee:
 
yeah because its irrelevant anyways the question is why do Indian Muslims still after partition need a separate party to represent them :coffee:
They don't.

ML just one political party, and does not represent all muslims - just like the Shiromani Akali Dal does not represent all Sikhs, and no political party represents all hindus. But people of any religion have the freedom to form a party for their community - that stems from freedom of association. However, if they come into power in any government at any level, they have to be secular in their functioning, as the constitution mandates.

The Indian Union Muslim league has many MLAs at the state level, and even a few ministers.
 
yeah because its irrelevant anyways the question is why do Indian Muslims still after partition need a separate party to represent them :coffee:
it only exists in kerala as a political force, and were coalition partner to the congress led govt in center as well as in kerala for sometime.
 
They don't.

ML just one political party, and does not represent all muslims - just like the Shiromani Akali Dal does not represent all Sikhs, and no political party represents all hindus. But people of any religion have the freedom to form a party for their community - that stems from freedom of association. However, if they come into power in any government at any level, they have to be secular in their functioning, as the constitution mandates.

The Indian Union Muslim league has many MLAs at the state level, and even a few ministers.
good my point was in reply to you trying to imply that somehow us in Pakistan are deliberately kept apart from this knowledge...now you have stated that they are irrelevant on the national scale so that settles it
 
Back
Top Bottom