1. If India invades Bangladesh, India will suffer.
Sure. All such actions involve suffering of some degree for the invader. Thats why its a last resort. But what matters is the balance of pros and cons of such an action. If BD tips it to that level with no nuclear umbrella, they will effectively be ended as a country very quickly....quite possibly without any overt Indian intervention at all.
2. You don't "control" Bangladesh like you claim.
Actually we already control them. Most of your compatriots agree as well. Ask
@That Guy @Areesh for example.
3. India didn't cause 1971, all it did was near the end of the war it decided to join in. That's it.
India was a foundation of the whole 1971 episode right from the start. Who do you think armed and sheltered major elements of the BD resistance/guerilla force? If India did nothing of the sort, 1971 would have been a very short affair. Again you can ask your think tank
@That Guy
The final overt Indian intervention was just to accelerate the result at the appropriate time in the year rather than draw it out (which in hindsight may have been a better thing to do given what BD has turned into).
Yes, but with no force at all we forced out PA troops in 1971 and kicked out IA troops in April. 1972.
You did not kick out squat little man. We left (on our accord in a staged manner) after we ransacked the place and there was nothing left for immediate repayment. You can ask your war veteran
@asad71 about it.
The other objective was to bring some semblance of stability to East Pakistan/BD and ensure the BD mobs didnt rip apart the Pakistani POWs (who surrendered to us and were thus under our protection). Once this was accomplished, why would we stick around any longer in a hellhole basket case? The forthcoming women of Dhaka were fun and all, but there is only so much of the other revolting stuff a professional army can tolerate.
stop ur day dreqming bd is not a small nation like palestine its worlds 8th largest country by population before big mouth read histroy of serbia and husburg empire or vietnam war bangladesh will be destroyed with half of india
Its a small country full of small minded small people like yourself. "Bangali Nazi"
You lot couldnt destroy 0.001% of India much less half of it weak puny little troll.
Its why your leaders lick our boots, and will continue to do so in future.
Maybe get your people (Especially women folk) to stop watching 12 hours each day of Indian dramas and soap operas on TV so they can actually care about how they are being exploited and controlled by Indian soft power first....so they can experience Indian hardpower if you can so infect their minds to desire it.
Honey you guys were saying same thing about us after Uri Drama but ended up getting your @55e5 kicked by us
,btw whats the score on Indian Side
BD has no nuclear umbrella that India has to factor into. They start even a tiny fraction of what Pakistan engages in with India, they will get shut down fast and hard. They know that, hence they kow tow and lick our boots eternally. It is their reward for 1971, they chose this destiny for their land.....I don't know why you concern yourself with these traitors.
Instead of crying here like the Indian Bhabis Scream on Po*nhub try to prove these Claims in UN,or else STFU
Kind of disturbing that you spend your time on such things and brag about it lel.
Anyway if you look at the tone I was using, I dont believe their (BD) claims about the genocide numbers etc etc. Rather I was using quoting the number as showing their weakness that they hold it up as absolute truth, but its built on very flimsy evidence.
Please read this entire thread where I called their BS and now they call me a psychopath because as an Indian (who ought to support their version of events fully) I did not take their side automatically:
https://defence.pk/threads/blood-telegram-a-fact-about-innocent-biharis.447780/
Why would India bring such numbers up into the UN when our own researchers like Sarmila Bose have put them into serious question? That is BD job to do.
