What's new

Indian Political Corner | All Updates & Discussions.

. .
In a midnight hearing SC refuses to stay Yeddyurappa swearing in. next hearing on Friday regarding time given for oath taking

Personally i dont agree with the current BJP stratergy they should have followed the bihar model of letting the congress-jds rule and return after some months . Doing this would have avoided the very big negative publicity which BJP is getting now
 
.
Personally i dont agree with the current BJP stratergy they should have followed the bihar model of letting the congress-jds rule and return after some months . Doing this would have avoided the very big negative publicity which BJP is getting now

I am seeing the opposite.
BJP is being praised for standing up to the eco system.

many times in the past BJP did not fight back under Atal and Advani. It was not due to morality but lack of courage to take on the eco system that resulted in their timidity.
People on ground, people who root for BJP are ecstatic for this move. If they fight, the ground workers get demoralized. Win of loose, what's important is the fight.

Remember how Indira came back with vengeance even after imposing emergency?
Remember how Rajiv won 3/4th majority even after Sikh genocide?

Indian electorate is very complex and for BJP to survive the coming onslaught every inch counts.
 
.
Personally i dont agree with the current BJP stratergy they should have followed the bihar model of letting the congress-jds rule and return after some months . Doing this would have avoided the very big negative publicity which BJP is getting now

Congress s tasting ther own medicine. Also Devegowda once grabs power doesn't let go. Everything es far as long as Congress s check mated.
 
.
I am seeing the opposite.
BJP is being praised for standing up to the eco system.

many times in the past BJP did not fight back under Atal and Advani. It was not due to morality but lack of courage to take on the eco system that resulted in their timidity.
People on ground, people who root for BJP are ecstatic for this move. If they fight, the ground workers get demoralized. Win of loose, what's important is the fight.

Remember how Indira came back with vengeance even after imposing emergency?
Remember how Rajiv won 3/4th majority even after Sikh genocide?

Indian electorate is very complex and for BJP to survive the coming onslaught every inch counts.

I am all for fighting a crook like a crook but what I am saying is do your dirty trick once Congress-JDS forms government and return back after few months . What's happening now is a very heavy negative publicity which could have been easily avoided

Congress s tasting ther own medicine. Also Devegowda once grabs power doesn't let go. Everything es far as long as Congress s check mated.

The whole point about Karnataka is to reduce the funding of congress which would have still happened with Congress-JDS combo . Do you think devagowda will allow congress to have a free run in using Karnataka as a ATM ? that's my whole point dude
 
. .
I am all for fighting a crook like a crook but what I am saying is do your dirty trick once Congress-JDS forms government and return back after few months . What's happening now is a very heavy negative publicity which could have been easily avoided

May be...
Let us see how BJP and RSS plays it out in public opinion.

BUT, Karnataka is very important. The reasons for importance are numerous from symbolism to economic.
Even a breather given is a chance lost.
Why take a chance?

The scenario you are putting across may yet come to pass & that option is always on the cards.
 
.
Personally i dont agree with the current BJP stratergy they should have followed the bihar model of letting the congress-jds rule and return after some months . Doing this would have avoided the very big negative publicity which BJP is getting now
Durbaris are angry because BJP refuses to play dead
113343cf969b94eb402c5e89dea2498a

BySujoy Ghosh
Posted on May 17, 2018


Why are the TV news anchors squirming like never before as BS Yeddyurappa is sworn in as Karnataka CM? Do you think these people do not know the long history of Congress governors acting in an arbitrary manner? Do you think they do not know how Congress dictators/Prime Ministers would dismiss Opposition state governments en masse … sometimes up to nine state governments at a time?

Of course, it is about partisanship. Some of it is about personal embarrassment. After all, many of India’s most well-known anchors spent much time covering Karnataka, following Siddaramaiah around, declaring him a “folk hero.” Then, the folk hero lost by 36,000 votes. Now, these anchors want to discuss everything except their shocking incompetence in analyzing election outcomes. They also want to keep people from discussing how Rahul Gandhi failed again.

But there is one more factor. And I believe its the biggest one. It’s their anger and surprise at a new Modi-fied BJP that refuses to play dead. Let me explain.

The year was 1999. Atal Behari Vajpayee’s government collapsed because it was one vote short. One vote!

That was the old BJP, always getting blindsided, fooled or taken for a ride.

The BJP struck a deal with BSP in the 90s to form the government in Uttar Pradesh based on a rotational CM post. Of course, Mayawati would go first. And of course, when it was the BJP’s turn to have the CM post, the BSP refused to support.

Same in Karnataka. In 2006, the BJP struck a deal with JDS to rule the state based on a rotational CM. Of course, Kumaraswamy would go first. And of course, when it was BJP’s turn to have the CM post, the JDS refused to support. How could it possibly be otherwise?

In the Bihar elections of 2000, the Samata Party (precursor of JDU) won just 34 seats. The BJP won nearly twice as many, i.e., 67 seats. Guess who the BJP offered the CM post? Nitish Kumar! And while Nitish’s government didn’t last, he had become the face of NDA in Bihar, a mistake for which BJP continues to pay even to this day.

The BJP is, by any standard, an electoral behemoth. In the last seven elections, the party has always won at least 100 Lok Sabha seats. To see how big this is, just try to count how many parties in India have ever touched 50 Lok Sabha seats even once!

But the BJP always punched below its weight and often laughably so. I wouldn’t say the durbaris “liked” the old BJP … but they were at least capable of coming to terms with it. As long as the BJP, even after emerging victorious, was willing to fall to the ground and beg forgiveness for winning … and promise the nobles in the ecosystem that their high status would not be affected.

As long as the BJP with 182 Lok Sabha seats in 1999 was willing to grovel before allies, willing to give them all the key Cabinet positions. Even the ministries that were technically with the BJP were offered to people who could be best described as newcomers and/or outsiders. Stool pigeons of the Congress saw it as an acknowledgement of intellectual inferiority on part of the BJP. You will see folks like Ram Guha often write fondly and with much satisfaction about this.

In other words, the ecosystem could make some sort of peace with the BJP, as long as they were willing to prostrate before the elite and play dead. This is the sort of mentality with which an arrogant Amartya Sen declared after 2014 results that he would “allow” Modi to rule. At that point, they were still very much consumed by the belief that Modi would ask them for their “permission,” whatever that means.

The thing is that their “permission” meant absolutely nothing to Modi. Zero. Zilch. Nada.

In fact, Modi would positively revel in showing how little he cared for that class. And this is what they cannot digest.

The BJP has been an electoral behemoth for a long time. But in terms of institutions, the party had almost no influence. Arguably, the BJP’s institutional imprint is smaller than even a tiny party like the CPIM. Twice in the last 20 years, the CPIM fell short of the minimum electoral performance required to maintain the status of a ‘national party.’ Both times, the Election Commission rewrote the definition of a national party, tailored it to suit the CPIM’s requirements and hand delivered them to the CPIM’s headquarters at A K Gopalan Bhavan in Delhi.

This is what *real power* looks like. When the institutions proactively surrender before you. The CPIM barely needed to ask. The Election Commission fell at their feet proactively without a murmur.

Compare this to the BJP which was running circles around the Election Commission in 2007 begging to keep its recognition merely as a political party.

Do I even have to remind people of the time the Supreme Court of India humbly agreed to the Emergency, pointing out that Indira Gandhi’s dictatorial move was almost “maternal”?

This status of the BJP as an outcast endured right up to the moment of May 16, 2014. Let me remind you that Narendra Modi, even in the campaign summer of 2014, could not get permission to address so much as a rally in Varanasi city, in the heart of a seat that he was contesting himself. The place where Modi was allowed to address a rally was so far from the population that hardly anybody could make it there: it was his only thinly attended rally in Uttar Pradesh that year.

A day before voting, the EC raided Modi’s offices in Varanasi. A smug NDTV announced to its viewers that “campaign material was seized” from the election office.

untitled22.png


Of course, you can’t punish a party for having election material in its election office. It was about sending the BJP a message … reminding them of their “aukaat.” Such was the complete, total and utter humiliation of the BJP, even days before they swept to power.

But tables have turned ever so slightly under the Modi regime. For the first time, at least a few decisions from India’s various “institutions” have gone in favour of the BJP. That is why you see the Congress agitating to have the EVMs cancelled, the Chief Election Commissioner sacked and the Chief Justice of India impeached. The Raj Bhavans across state capitals have always been part of the servants quarters at 10 Janpath. They have always been used to show the BJP its place.

Suddenly, the Congress Party and the ecosystem sees a different face of Raj Bhavan. The people making the decisions have changed. And you can’t raid the BJP’s election office any more for the “crime” of possessing campaign material. That’s why they are so angry. Let them.

SHARE THIS:
 
.
I am all for fighting a crook like a crook but what I am saying is do your dirty trick once Congress-JDS forms government and return back after few months . What's happening now is a very heavy negative publicity which could have been easily avoided



The whole point about Karnataka is to reduce the funding of congress which would have still happened with Congress-JDS combo . Do you think devagowda will allow congress to have a free run in using Karnataka as a ATM ? that's my whole point dude

No one else, not even for a few months should get the opportunity to milk the Karnataka cow. :lol:
 
.
Imagine the negative campaign unleashed against BJP in 2019 when they have formed government by getting few opposition MLA's . Now that Yeddy has resigned we can have the moral high ground for 2019 , now let shah play his usual games and bring these guys down after few months
 
. .
. .
Modi seems to winning the war on Bank NPA's. One more feather n the cap :agree:
Over 2,100 companies settle Rs 83,000 crore bank dues
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com...-83k-crore-bank-dues/articleshow/64279946.cms

Modi’s IBC masterstroke: As Bhushan Steel puts Rs 36,400 core in banks’ kitty; India winning NPA war
https://www.financialexpress.com/ec...in-banks-kitty-india-winning-npa-war/1173671/
Mallya and Nirav are next :victory:

Define Suit boot Ki sarkar :

1) Ask RBI to Conduct the Asset Quality review to find the real picture of bad loans
2) Publish the actual amount of bad loans in the economy and identify the priority accounts to be cleared
3) 12 accounts with 25% of NPA identified
3) Pass IBC to ensure timely resolution of NPA's to protect banks from defaulters
4) Empower RBI to force banks to refer the NPA's to NCLT
5) The already identified 12 accounts referred and the rest is history

https://economictimes.indiatimes.co...ion-of-12-major-npas/articleshow/64245392.cms
 
.
Back
Top Bottom