Indian minister points finger at hindu Terrorist for Mumbai attack

[slugger]

Indias statement terrosit being from pakistan is supported by what evidence.

India's statement that Pakistan is involved in terrorist operation in India is supported by the very same evidence that got the U.N to declare that JuD is intrinsically involved in terrorist operations in India and has banned these organistation and called for the freeze of their bank accounts

Indian army providing ammo to fire bomb train to kill hindus to start fightning was supported by evidence we all no person incharge of that investigation is quite for good now who stands to benefit from that INDIAN army hindu terrosit thats who.

You are sounding incoherent here. Are you talking about Godhra or Samjhauta? If you are accusing Lt. Col Prasad Purohit of being involved in the Godhra train burnig incident, then I suggest you Google and check why Lt. Col Purohit has been arrested.

Let me save you some bandwidth and tell you why - Lt. Col Purohit has been arrested on charges of supposedly providing the RDX that was used in the Malegaon blast. Since your faculties of Geography leave a lot to be desired, let me enlighten you about India - Malegaon is in Maharashtra whereas Godhra is in Gujrat.

With your heightened knowledge of Geography, let me now go on to further enlighten you that nowhere has anybody ever accuse Lt. col Purohit of being involved in the Godhra incidence - you are the first
If you are accusing Lt. Col Purohit of being involved in the Samjhauta blast, then you would be extremely saddened to know that according to forensic reports

But serious questions remain over the claims made given that no trace of RDX was found in the Samjhauta Express explosions.

Sad aren't you?

he was a minister so yes he was in position to make decisions unless you are claiming that your democracy is flawed and only few in india can make decisions like oh say higher class hindus only.

Mr. A.R. Antulay is a minority affairs minister. Policy decision of India that pertain to its National security, Territorial integrity and Foreign relations are taken by the consultative efforts of the Ministries of External Affairs, Home, Defence and Finance. This consultative proceeding is headed by the Prime Minister of the country. The decision taken by these ministries is then made known to the complete cabinet. The leader of the opposition is also taken into confidence while formulating policies pertainig to Naitional interest

Common sense [that you appear to lack] would have told you that the portfolio of the Minister of Minority affairs does not include National security and foreign relation

P.S: Your continued display of ignorant belligerance has become a great source of humor to me. It is keeping my spirits high. I now get at least an hour of healthy, unadulterated laughter everyday.
I am fortunate to be part of such a forum, where the member have such a fine sense of humor and seek to make people laugh their hearts out - no doubt your countrymen keep winning all the laughter challenges held in India

 

[roadrunner]

India's government is under pressure to respond following a minister's controversial remarks over the killing of top officers in the Mumbai attacks.

Minority Affairs Minister AR Antulay suggested there could have been more to the deaths than just the militants.

Mumbai's anti-terrorism chief Hemant Karkare, who was among those killed, had been investigating suspected Hindu radical attacks in Maharashtra state.

Mr Antulay refused to confirm or deny he had submitted his resignation.

Mr Antulay's suggestion that the deaths could be linked to the investigation into the alleged Hindu radical attacks led to outrage among opposition politicians.

They said the minister's statement had embarrassed the country and they urged him to resign.

'Irresponsible'

Mr Antulay on Friday said he "stood by the truth".

The Times of India quoted him as saying: "Whether Karkare was a victim of terrorism or terrorism plus something, I do not know."

He added: "Karkare and two other police officers were definitely killed by the Pakistani terrorists. Even a fool knows this. What I asked was who sent Karkare and the two officers there?"

When asked about the reports of his offer to resign, the minister told the Press Trust of India news agency: "I am neither confirming it nor denying it."

Mr Antulay's Congress party has distanced itself from his remarks, saying it did not accept the "inference and innuendo that underline" them.

Federal Parliamentary Affairs Minister Vyalar Ravi has said the government will "examine" Mr Antulay's statement and "respond accordingly" in parliament.

Santosh Gangwar, a leader of the main opposition Bharatiya Janata Party, has said Mr Antulay's "irresponsible statement has created a problem for the country".

Mr Karkare, the head of Mumbai's Anti-Terrorist Squad, was one of several top officers who lost their lives in the attacks which began on 26 November.

Mr Antulay suggested a link to the investigation into the role of Hindu radicals in two bombings in Maharashtra state which killed at least eight people in September.

An army officer, Prasad Shrikant Purohit, and a female priest have been held in connection with the blasts and are accused of providing logistical support for Hindu militants to make bombs
BBC NEWS | South Asia | Minister in Mumbai police furore

An Indian minister suggesting the Mumbai attacks could have been planned by Hindus in India? Shocking.

Off with his head for making such a suggestion. Resign him. Then make him into a dahi walla seller

 

[roadrunner]

India's statement that Pakistan is involved in terrorist operation in India is supported by the very same evidence that got the U.N to declare that JuD is intrinsically involved in terrorist operations in India and has banned these organistation and called for the freeze of their bank accounts

Get this clear.

The UN did not ban JuD because it was behind the Mumbai attacks.

The UN banned JuD because it had possible relations to LeT, a banned group.

 

[PakShaheen79]

Get this clear.

The UN did not ban JuD because it was behind the Mumbai attacks.

The UN banned JuD because it had possible relations to LeT, a banned group.

And in the second run UNSC refuse to add more names to the list leaving India red faced.

 

[Flintlock]

Get this clear.

The UN did not ban JuD because it was behind the Mumbai attacks.

The UN banned JuD because it had possible relations to LeT, a banned group.

The JuD is a front group for the LeT. It became a prominent front after the LeT was formally banned in Pakistan.
The two organizations have the same leadership, and share the same funding. So money collected by the "JuD" is just as likely to be used to train terrorists as to build an extremist school. As Condoleeza Rice said, the US has learnt the hard way that these so called "Charitable Organizations" are just wings of groups promoting extremist ideology.
It should evoke deep concern in Pakistan that extremist groups are running schools and hospitals, thus spreading their poison deeper into mainstream society.

 

[slugger]

Get this clear.

The UN did not ban JuD because it was behind the Mumbai attacks.

The UN banned JuD because it had possible relations to LeT, a banned group.

Bans are imposed not on the basis of possibility but certainity.

 

[slugger]

And in the second run UNSC refuse to add more names to the list leaving India red faced.

Would you care to support your statement with a valid non-Pakistani link

Afterall if the U.N takes a decision of refusal, its has got to be reported by every major newspaper

 

[Zovc]

Well atleast someone speaks for the truth in India. Only a ape can deny Indian Agencies/BJP's involvement in the attacks.

 

[Kismat]

Antulay immediately forced to resign.

What democracy
What nationalism
What diversity

Hmm... I am sure this is not the first country where a media hullabaloo caused a politician to step down or apologize. In these attacks itself:
1. Shivraj Patil: resigned for inefficieny: media furore earlier on changing clothes thrice when the capital had been bombed earlier this year.
2. Maharashtra Chief Minister Vilasrao Desmukh: resigned for inefficiency and then laughing and joking in a media conference just after the mumbai attacks
3. Maharashtra Deputy chief minister RR Patil: resigned as he called this incident small even while mumbai burned.
4. Kerala Chief minister had to apologize publicly for shooting his mouth off about a martyrs family.

So yes there have been cases where the ministers have had to watch their step and not use these events for their own ends and for the game of votebank politics.

Or is it your case that diversity means that only muslim ministers should not resign? we are an equal opportunity country

 

[PakShaheen79]

Bans are imposed not on the basis of possibility but certainity.

Indeed

UN Puts Dead Man on Terrorist List
by Saeed Ahmed December 11, 2008



ISLAMABAD (GroundReport) : The United Nations seems to have acquired the ability to ban the movements of the souls of deceased by putting a deceased person Haji Muhammad Ashraf after six years and six months of his death on list of terrorists and asked the world nations to freeze his assets and ban his movements and his ability to arm himself.

GroundReport | Pakistan | UN Puts Dead Man on Terrorist List

Can some please freez his assests and ban his movements in his garve

 

[GunMan]

Get this clear.

The UN did not ban JuD because it was behind the Mumbai attacks.

The UN banned JuD because it had possible relations to LeT, a banned group.

Hello,why do u think UN wake up from deep slumber & banned JuD only after 26/11 terror attack??

Its wont take a five old to relate these events unless he too have developed denial streaks.

 

[slugger]

GroundReport | Pakistan | UN Puts Dead Man on Terrorist List

Can some please freez his assests and ban his movements in his garve

good for him. but i heard he was

was dumped at the Civil Hospital, Hyderabad shackled in chains in Feburary 2002, where he died of various medical complications on June 11, 2002

Pakistani's ill-treated a 70-year old man. how can a God-fearing Pakistani treat a 70-year old man in this manner
How can you laugh at the death of a 70-year old man who died in this manner.

But JuD is very much alive and intrinsically involved in the acts of terror carried out by Pakistani citizens

 

[roadrunner]

Hello,why do u think UN wake up from deep slumber & banned JuD only after 26/11 terror attack??

Its wont take a five old to relate these events unless he too have developed denial streaks.

Why do you Indians make up your own facts?

If one event occurs, and then another event occurs, the second event is not proof of anything to do with the first event, unless it's been stated as such.

It was not stated that JuD were banned because they had planned the attacks.

It was stated that they were a mask of LeT.

 

[GunMan]

Why do you Indians make up your own facts?

If one event occurs, and then another event occurs, the second event is not proof of anything to do with the first event, unless it's been stated as such.

It was not stated that JuD were banned because they had planned the attacks.

It was stated that they were a mask of LeT.

For United nations,it doesnt matter what Pakistani Govt believes.
you must have heard leaders from USA,UK,Russia etc confirming involvement LeT(JuD) in mumbai terror attacks.And these guys also run the show at UN security council.

 

[linkinpark]

Why do you Indians make up your own facts?

If one event occurs, and then another event occurs, the second event is not proof of anything to do with the first event, unless it's been stated as such.

It was not stated that JuD were banned because they had planned the attacks.

It was stated that they were a mask of LeT.

But why was it Banned suddenly, if the evidence was there for many years. It was only after 26/11 upon request by India supported by US and many other countries that it was banned. Jeez, you have some serious problems in accepting truths.