What's new

Indian archaeologists refute claim Taj Mahal was once a Hindu temple

All of it.

You dress like them ?
You speak their language ?
You practice their religion ?
You know their customs ?
You eat like them ?
You build cities like them ?

:lol: ...... from where I stand, you do NONE of those things :lol:
 
You dress like them ?
You speak their language ?
You practice their religion ?
You know their customs ?
You eat like them ?
You build cities like them ?

:lol: ...... from where I stand, you do NONE of those things :lol:


Religion, customs, culture evolves... genetics and blood remains .

Case in point current British are decendents of the Anglo-Saxons,... they no longer follow the same religion, culture or clothing...

Pakistanis are the decendents of the ancient Indus Civilization... no matter how much it burns you.

C7RpE8hVsAAkiff.jpg
 
Religion, customs, culture evolves... genetics and blood remains .

Case in point current British are decendents of the Anglo-Saxons,... they no longer follow the same religion, culture or clothing...

Pakistanis are the decendents of the ancient Indus Civilization... no matter how much it burns you.

C7RpE8hVsAAkiff.jpg


But since you believe in the Aryan invasion theory that says the Aryans wiped out the Indus valley people and their civilization, you do not even share the same genetics :lol:
 
But since you believe in the Aryan invasion theory that says the Aryans wiped out the Indus valley people and their civilization, you do not even share the same genetics :lol:


The Caste system was the subjugation by us to the people of the South of pakistan.

Sorry, the inferior always gravitate to the master. That is why you will find Indians on PDF but hardly every any Pak on any Indian IDF types.

Facts. Sorry.
 
The Caste system was the subjugation by us to the people of the South of pakistan.

Sorry, the inferior always gravitate to the master. That is why you will find Indians on PDF but hardly every any Pak on any Indian IDF types.

Facts. Sorry.

Most Indians come to pdf to have the satisfaction of kicking pakistani @ss.
 
Most Indians come to pdf to have the satisfaction of kicking pakistani @ss.


Sure... if that illusion makes you feel good.

But in society it's usually the lesser who gravitate towards the superior. Never the vice versa.
 
Sure... if that illusion makes you feel good.

But in society it's usually the lesser who gravitate towards the superior. Never the vice versa.

This is not society, its an anonymous internet forum. Learn to differentiate between the two.
 
This is not society, its an anonymous internet forum. Learn to differentiate between the two.

Between Virtual reality, online reality, and "real life"... the lines are getting blurry.

They are all still a reflection of our inner selves.
 
Between Virtual reality, online reality, and "real life"... the lines are getting blurry.

They are all still a reflection of our inner selves.

Nope, its just a reflection of our inner desires.
 
Lol go read Allah bad high court judgement

What it stated

First and basis of it

Before It start humliating for you

Lol human and animal remains due concept of nar Bali lol

(C) VERBATIM GIST OF THE FINDINGS BY
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR AGARWAL
1. The area covered under the central dome of the disputed structure is the birthplace of
Lord Rama as per faith and belief of Hindus.

2. Disputed structure was always treated, considered and believed to be a mosque and
practised by Mohammedans for worship accordingly. However, it has not been proved
that it was built during the reign of Babar in 1528.
3. In the absence of any otherwise pleadings and material it is difficult to hold as to when
and by whom the disputed structure was constructed but this much is clear that the same
was constructed before the visit of Joseph Tieffenthaler in Oudh area between 1766 to
1771.
4. The building in dispute was constructed after demolition of Non- Islamic religious
structure, i.e., a Hindu temple.

5. The idols were kept under the central dome of the disputed structure in the night of
22nd/23rd December 1949. Other Original Suits no. 3 of 1989 and 4 of 1989 are barr
LOL You worked so hard to copy paste but forgot to notice the obvious...

"The area covered under the central dome of the disputed structure is the birthplace of
Lord Rama as per faith and belief of Hindus.
"

LOL So you first claimed that ASI stated so, when confronted for lying, you come up with High court statement which again states "as per faith and belief".
 
Back
Top Bottom