India will suffer worse losses than 1962 if it incites border clash

[footmarks]

Machar is only good at flying around the *** of holy mother cow and yes you all are really good at it . Bravo!

Machhar is capable of flying around anywhere, be it holy cow, holy cube in the desert or the holy book. so don't be a hijra trying to kill this machhar

 

[$@rJen]

And Let me tell you we paid For Rafale And in emergency Like Indo-china war We can Use french rafale's as Ours

IAF Pilots already training in France for that

Are you sure?? I don't think so it is possible. @Abingdonboy can you confirm

 

[Well.wisher]

My friend that question was to chinese, now that you have answered, i am not gonna waste my time reading your post.....

I can hear that " ouch "!!

 

[SarthakGanguly]

The Cold War-obsessed India is suspicious that China is building the road to cut off the Siliguri Corridor, an area held by Indians as strategically important for India to control its turbulent northeast area.

For obvious reasons.

PR China is not building a road to Bhutan to buy yetis there. The objectives are clear. Don't insult us my claiming the reasons are otherwise.

I can hear that " ouch "!!

Your picture does not 'Wish well'.

Yes, I can read Urdu. In Nastaleeq.

 

[rcrmj]

The following is a list of China’s current claims against other countries, all of which it has made painfully clear it is willing to go to war over:

Afghanistan

Afghan province of Bahdashan (despite treaty of 1963, China still encroaches on Afghan territory).

Bhutan

Bhutanese enclaves in Tibet, namely Cherkip Gompa, Dho, Dungmar, Gesur, Gezon, Itse Gompa, Khochar, Nyanri, Ringung, Sanmar, Tarchen and Zuthulphuk. Also Kula Kangri and mountainous areas to the west of this peak, plus the western Haa District of Bhutan

Brunei

South China Sea especially Spratly Islands

Burma

China claims large areas of Burma on historical precedent (Yuan Dynasty, 1271-1368). There are unspecified border disputes with Burma.

Cambodia

China has, on occasion, claimed parts of Cambodia on historical precedent (Ming Dynasty, 1368-1644)

India

Aksai Chin (part of Jammu and Kashmir), Demchok, Chumar, Kaurik, Shipki Pass, Jadh, and Lapthal Shaksgam Valley, South Tibet (part of India-controlled Arunachal Pradesh), Trans-Karakoram Tract

Indonesia

Parts of the South China Sea.

Japan

Parts of the East China Sea, particularly the Senkaku Islands. Also, on occasion, the Ryukyu Islands, on the grounds that the completely independent Kingdom of Ryukyu was once a vassal state of China. The Kingdom of Ryukyu terminated tributary relations with China in 1874.

Kazakhstan

There are continual unilateral claims by China on Kazakhstan territory, despite new agreements, in China’s favour, signed every few years.

Kyrgyzstan

China claims the majority of Kyrgyzstan on the grounds that it was unfairly forced to cede the territory (which it had formerly conquered) to Russia in the 19th century.

Laos

China claims large areas of Laos on historical precedent (Yuan Dynasty, 1271-1368)

Malaysia

Parts of the South China Sea, particularly the Spratly Islands

Mongolia

China claims all of Mongolia on historical precedent (Yuan Dynasty, 1271-1368). In fact, Mongolia, under Genghis Khan, occupied China.

Nepal

China claims parts of Nepal dating back to the Sino-Nepalese War in 1788-1792. China claims they are part of Tibet, therefore part of China.

North Korea

Baekdu Mountain and Jiandao. China has also on occasion claimed all of North Korea on historical grounds (Yuan Dynasty, 1271-1368).

Pakistan

Territory is still unilaterally claimed by China, despite China signing numerous agreements.

Philippines

Parts of the South China Sea, particularly Scarborough Shoal and the Spratly Islands

Russia

160,000 square kilometres still unilaterally claimed by China, despite China signing numerous agreements.

Singapore

Parts of the South China Sea.

South Korea

Parts of the East China Sea. China has also on occasion claimed all of South Korea on historical grounds (Yuan Dynasty, 1271-1368).

Taiwan

China claims all of Taiwan, but particular disputes are: Macclesfield Bank, Paracel Islands, Scarborough Shoal, Senkaku Islands, parts of the South China Sea and the Spratly Islands.

Tajikistan

China claims parts of Tajikistan on historical precedent (Qing Dynasty, 1644-1912).

Vietnam

China claims large parts of Vietnam on historical precedent (Ming Dynasty, 1368-1644). Also: Macclesfield Bank, Paracel Islands, parts of the South China Sea and the Spratly Islands.

Additionally, China recently taunted Hillary Clinton about claiming territorial rights on Hawaii, and claimed that Chinese sailors had settled peacefully in Australia centuries before European discovery. And let’s not forget the supposed 1418 map that “proves” China discovered the Americas (and the entire world) long before Columbus.

https://chinadailymail.com/2013/12/...of-23-countries-but-only-has-borders-with-14/

there is only one country that China has land dispute with, that is India````well I guess BS sucking Hindus will only taking these nonsenses seriosuly, as how they are keep saying 1967 1967 1967

 

[footmarks]

there is only one country that China has land dispute with, that is India````well I guess BS sucking Hindus will only taking these nonsenses seriosuly, as how they are keep saying 1967 1967 1967

For the bold part - open your slit-eyes and see our middle finger.

 

[AnnoyingOrange]

go to develop your IQ and logic kid, or you will always be the laughing stock of people who are living in a realy world``

Right now its China that is becoming laughing stock of the world by flip flopping every couple of hours... High IQ Chinese LOL

 

[$@rJen]

India is like a machar infront of china the dragon .

Ohh the drogon that's whineing through their media with warnings for the last one week!!!

 

[ohmrlobalobayeh]

India will suffer worse losses than 1962 if it incites border clash
SAM Staff, July 5, 2017

The face-off between Chinese and Indian troops in the Sikkim section of the Sino-Indian border seems to be escalating. The Indian military was quoted by Indian media as saying that more troops have been deployed there in a non-combative mode. Indian Defense Minister Arun Jaitley claimed that the India of 2017 is different from the India of 1962. Chief of Staff of the Indian Army, General Bipin Rawat, even said they are fully ready for a two-and-a-half front war – referring to China, Pakistan and internal security requirements.

Indian troops have trespassed over the China-Sikkim border, which is viewed as having already been demarcated, and is not a line of actual control. The Indian side has changed arguments several times, first claiming that “China intruded onto Indian territory,” but later saying “there was no incursion into our territory,” followed by the new excuse that India is helping Bhutan safeguard its territory. India is acting shamelessly before the international community.

New Delhi’s real purpose is to turn the Donglang area of China into a disputed region and block China’s road construction there. The Cold War-obsessed India is suspicious that China is building the road to cut off the Siliguri Corridor, an area held by Indians as strategically important for India to control its turbulent northeast area. India is taking the risk to betray the historical agreement and wants to force China to swallow the result.

Also Read: Like India, China also different from 1962: Beijing threatens New Delhi with war

India should look in the mirror. It was not able to refute the evidence of illegal border-trespassing and coerced its small neighbor Bhutan to shoulder the blame. India has long treated Bhutan as a vassal state, a rare scene under modern international relations. India’s illegal border intrusion is not allowed by international law; besides its suppression of Bhutan must be condemned by the international community. The Indian media claimed in recent days that New Delhi “shouldn’t abandon Bhutan.” India is humiliating the civilization of the 21st Century.

The Chinese public is infuriated by India’s provocation. We believe the Chinese People’s Liberation Army is powerful enough to expel Indian troops out of Chinese territory.

We firmly believe that the face-off in the Donglang area will end up with the Indian troops in retreat. The Indian military can choose to return to its territory with dignity, or be kicked out of the area by Chinese soldiers.

If New Delhi believes that its military might can be used as leverage in the Donglang area, and it’s ready for a two-and-a-half front war, we have to tell India that the Chinese look down on their military power. Jaitley is right that the India of 2017 is different from that of 1962 – India will suffer greater losses than in 1962 if it incites military conflicts.

China attaches great importance to domestic stability and doesn’t want to be mired in a mess with India. But New Delhi would be too naïve to think that Beijing would make concessions to its unruly demands.

Instead of taking immediate action, China still wants to address disputes by peaceful means, a practice that has been maintained for decades, and it is unwilling to face a pattern of confrontation in the border area. But a peaceful solution must lead to legitimate and justified outcomes. We hope India can face up to the hazards of its unruly actions to the country’s fundamental interests and withdraw its troops without delay.

We need to give diplomatic and military authorities full power to handle the issue. We call on Chinese society to maintain high-level unity on the issue. The more unified the Chinese people are, the more sufficient conditions the professionals will have to fight against India and safeguard our interests. This time, we must teach New Delhi a bitter lesson.

http://southasianmonitor.com/2017/07/05/india-will-suffer-worse-losses-1962-incites-border-clash/

india is lucky China has a lognstanding policy of non-inteferance with other's internal affairs.

else, India would have been taken totally over by Maoists a long time ago

 

[HariVamsha]

india is lucky China has a lognstanding policy of non-inteferance with other's internal affairs.
else, India would have been taken over by Maoists a long time ago

LOL....... is that a "warning" ?

 

[ohmrlobalobayeh]

LOL....... is that a "warning" ?

it was a casual observation

But i like your sensitiveness

 

[Well.wisher]

Machhar is capable of flying around anywhere, be it holy cow, holy cube in the desert or the holy book. so don't be a hijra trying to kill this machhar

And this is what you get kaalay machar.

 

[SarthakGanguly]

india is lucky China has a lognstanding policy of non-inteferance with other's internal affairs.

else, India would have been taken totally over by Maoists a long time ago

That would have changed NOTHING between India and PR China.

The PR Chinese would have remained a bully. And a Left ruled India would have defended her neighbors.

Look at Socialist Vietnam. Did PR China spare them? It is another story that they got beat there, but the intention was always there.

 

[footmarks]

View attachment 409062

And this is what you get kaalay machar.

LOL, See!! you, the joker, can't kill the machhar

 

[HariVamsha]

it was a casual observation

But i like your sensitiveness

Just wanted to know if it was a "warning" or a "whining"

I guess it was a whining.