India will suffer worse losses than 1962 if it incites border clash

[dray]

We don't worry about people like you, but we do have sympathy for Indian soldiers who are actually starving.

Yep, they are keeping their stomach empty to have feast on PLA biryani.

That's because Chinese give you face, and they still wish to solve disputes without resorting to fire power. You should be grateful.

You mean 'warning power'?

 

[Dungeness]

Let's see, who starts firing the first bullet?

China will not be the first one. It is very strange that China has a "not first firing" policy, but they will make sure whoever fires the 1st shot will not fire the 2nd.

 

[dray]

Let's see, who starts firing the first bullet?

Oh.. Dragons lack balls...Have you ever seen a dragon with balls!

 

[BetterPakistan]

We all know this. China and India power difference today is much bigger than it was in 1962.

 

[thesolar65]

China will not be the first one. It is very strange that China has a "not first firing" policy, but they will make sure whoever fires the 1st shot will not fire the 2nd.

Well then get ready to wait for eternity!

 

[dray]

China will not be the first one. It is very strange that China has a "not first firing" policy, but they will make sure whoever fires the 1st shot will not fire the 2nd.

We have stopped the road construction without firing a shot....Imagine what else we can stop if we start firing.

 

[Dungeness]

Yep, they are keeping their stomach empty to have feast on PLA biryani.



You mean 'warning power'?

You are laughing now, but who knows who will be laughing the last. Learn something from the recent past, and you may be understanding what I have been trying to let you know.

 

[footmarks]

That's because Chinese give you face, and they still wish to solve disputes without resorting to fire power. You should be grateful.

Keep giving us face or save your face through repeated warnings?

 

[dray]

You are laughing now, but who knows who will be laughing the last. Learn something from the recent past, and you may be understanding what I have been trying to let you know.

We will keep laughing at the silly hegemonistic paper dragon with inflated ego and no balls.

 

[Dungeness]

Well then get ready to wait for eternity!

Be careful what you ask for. Who is the one bitching for 55 years after a little border fight?

We will keep laughing at the silly hegemonistic paper dragon with inflated ego and no balls.

OK, be my guest. You laugh anyway you want, inside out or upside down, who cares.

 

[GURU DUTT]

India will suffer worse losses than 1962 if it incites border clash
SAM Staff, July 5, 2017

The face-off between Chinese and Indian troops in the Sikkim section of the Sino-Indian border seems to be escalating. The Indian military was quoted by Indian media as saying that more troops have been deployed there in a non-combative mode. Indian Defense Minister Arun Jaitley claimed that the India of 2017 is different from the India of 1962. Chief of Staff of the Indian Army, General Bipin Rawat, even said they are fully ready for a two-and-a-half front war – referring to China, Pakistan and internal security requirements.

Indian troops have trespassed over the China-Sikkim border, which is viewed as having already been demarcated, and is not a line of actual control. The Indian side has changed arguments several times, first claiming that “China intruded onto Indian territory,” but later saying “there was no incursion into our territory,” followed by the new excuse that India is helping Bhutan safeguard its territory. India is acting shamelessly before the international community.

New Delhi’s real purpose is to turn the Donglang area of China into a disputed region and block China’s road construction there. The Cold War-obsessed India is suspicious that China is building the road to cut off the Siliguri Corridor, an area held by Indians as strategically important for India to control its turbulent northeast area. India is taking the risk to betray the historical agreement and wants to force China to swallow the result.

Also Read: Like India, China also different from 1962: Beijing threatens New Delhi with war

India should look in the mirror. It was not able to refute the evidence of illegal border-trespassing and coerced its small neighbor Bhutan to shoulder the blame. India has long treated Bhutan as a vassal state, a rare scene under modern international relations. India’s illegal border intrusion is not allowed by international law; besides its suppression of Bhutan must be condemned by the international community. The Indian media claimed in recent days that New Delhi “shouldn’t abandon Bhutan.” India is humiliating the civilization of the 21st Century.

The Chinese public is infuriated by India’s provocation. We believe the Chinese People’s Liberation Army is powerful enough to expel Indian troops out of Chinese territory.

We firmly believe that the face-off in the Donglang area will end up with the Indian troops in retreat. The Indian military can choose to return to its territory with dignity, or be kicked out of the area by Chinese soldiers.

If New Delhi believes that its military might can be used as leverage in the Donglang area, and it’s ready for a two-and-a-half front war, we have to tell India that the Chinese look down on their military power. Jaitley is right that the India of 2017 is different from that of 1962 – India will suffer greater losses than in 1962 if it incites military conflicts.

China attaches great importance to domestic stability and doesn’t want to be mired in a mess with India. But New Delhi would be too naïve to think that Beijing would make concessions to its unruly demands.

Instead of taking immediate action, China still wants to address disputes by peaceful means, a practice that has been maintained for decades, and it is unwilling to face a pattern of confrontation in the border area. But a peaceful solution must lead to legitimate and justified outcomes. We hope India can face up to the hazards of its unruly actions to the country’s fundamental interests and withdraw its troops without delay.

We need to give diplomatic and military authorities full power to handle the issue. We call on Chinese society to maintain high-level unity on the issue. The more unified the Chinese people are, the more sufficient conditions the professionals will have to fight against India and safeguard our interests. This time, we must teach New Delhi a bitter lesson.

http://southasianmonitor.com/2017/07/05/india-will-suffer-worse-losses-1962-incites-border-clash/

lolzzz we are so scared he he he he

 

[dray]

Be careful what you ask for. Who is the one bitching for 55 years after a little border fight?

We thrashed China in reply 5 years later and went on to merge Sikkim with us, while China was left sucking thumb. Paper Dragons..

 

[Dungeness]

Keep giving us face or save your face through repeated warnings?

Yeah, last time around, who was bitching about "surprise attack" or "sneak attack"? You guys should be grateful China is giving you enough warnings to just shut your up in case something happens.

We thrashed China in reply 5 years later and went on to merge Sikkim with us, while China was left sucking thumb. Paper Dragons..

Funny,even your general did not have the balls to mention about 1967, but people like you keep referring to the cho la incident. I am kinda wondering why. You have bigger balls than your Defense Minister?

 

[dray]

Yeah, last time around, who was bitching about "surprise attack" or "sneak attack"? You guys should be grateful China is giving you enough warnings to just shut your up in case something happens.



Funny,even your general did not have the balls to mention about 1967, but people like you keep referring to the cho la incident. I am kinda wondering why. You have bigger balls than your Defense Minister?

As I said, we are not interested in much talking and issuing warnings...We have done what we wanted to do...Road construction has been stopped....Now whether China backs off or sit there or issue more warnings or fight a war is up to them. We would prefer if you don't bore us with your useless daily warnings.

 

[Dungeness]

As I said, we are not interested in much talking and issuing warnings...We have done what we wanted to do...Road construction has been stopped....Now whether China backs off or sit there or issue more warnings or fight a war is up to them. We would prefer if you don't bore us with your useless daily warnings.

Warnings serve a purpose to civilized people, and Chinese would give any people a benefit of doubt.