What's new

India Will Not Get Permanent Seat On UN Security Council This Year

dani958

BANNED
Joined
Jul 23, 2016
Messages
1,305
Reaction score
-6
Country
Israel
Location
Israel
India Will Not Get Permanent Seat On UN Security Council This Year
All India | Written by Nidhi Razdan (with inputs from Agencies) | Updated: July 28, 2016 15:06 IST

by Taboola
Sponsored Links

Sponsored
Say Bye Bye To Back Pain With This Trick. (BackGenie)
Are you a strategic thinker? Test your skills with millions of addicted players! (Stormfall: Free Online Game)


54COMMENTS
un-security-council_650x400_71456453064.jpg


After more than 20 years of stalling, the Security Council reform process gained momentum last year.

UNITED NATIONS:
HIGHLIGHTS
  1. UN Security Council has 15 members, 5 of them permanent
  2. India wants to become permanent member
  3. UN postpones decision to next year for expanding council

India will not be given a permanent seat this year on the United Nations Security Council: a decision has been deferred to next year with discussions between countries unable to reach a breakthrough.

"It is unfortunate that the 70th anniversary of the United Nations was not able to build up momentum with a view to reaching an agreement on this important item of the agenda of the General Assembly," India said in a joint statement with Brazil, Japan and Germany.

The four countries jointly work for expanding the Security Council's permanent membership and mutually support each other for permanent seats and are known as G4.

The United Nations has 193 member countries who form the General Assembly. A meeting of their representatives has just ended without a decision on reconfiguring the Security Council, which has 15 members who decide how to maintain international peace and security. Britain, France, the United States, China and Russia are permanent members and hold veto power.


Last month, India failed to gain entry to the Nuclear Suppliers Group, a block of 48 countries that control the trade in nuclear technology and material.

India wants a permanent place on the Security Council to reflect its importance as a trillion dollar economy and a major South Asian power.

After more than 20 years of stalling, moves to reform the council to reflect a more global balance of power gained momentum last year when a negotiating text was adopted by the General Assembly, overcoming strong opposition from a small group of countries including Pakistan and Italy.

The adoption of the text was a breakthrough as meaningful negotiations could not be held without such a document.

Most UN members support increasing the total number of council members from 15 to the mid-20s and for making its working more transparent and involving non-member countries in its activities.
http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/indias-security-council-permanent-seat-hope-receives-setback-1437293
 
it will heppen maybe next year but does india have good inaugh realtion with israel to putt veto on decison agains israel?
 
India won't get it ever especially the way she is behaving lately...sponsoring terrorism in the region, escalating situation with the neighbours and murdering minorities especially Muslims and Christian and genocide of people in Kashmir, it can never ever get permanent seat....it may end up getting wiped out of its sorry existence due to her terrorism. Pretty gloomy picture for the poor toiletless Indian cities and villages.
 
We can't even get NSG forget about UNSC
 
won't China just veto you out ? but still keep on dreaming
 
i think india should get parmament in UNSC she is 16 percent of world populolation
 
i think india should get parmament in UNSC she is 16 percent of world populolation

Stop being their cheerleader. :lol:

On the topic, I think it will be quite hard as UNSC is club of 5 elite members, adding more countries will actually devalue their power and they won't let that happen. Even countries who support the inclusion of new members such USA know this very well that, any inclusion will actually further divide their powers and will make them less powerful. I think they will not include any new members any time soon. even if someone is ready the veto will always be there. Without Veto that group is useless.
 
Last edited:
Indian dreams of becoming Permanent Members have came and gone. A crank country cannot be given this seat.
 
Stop being their cheerleader. :lol:

On the topic, I think it will be quite hard as UNSC is club of 5 elite members, adding more countries will actually devalue their power and they won't let that happen. Even countries who support the inclusion of new members such USA know this very value any inclusion will actually further divide their powers and will make them less powerful. I think they will not include any new members any time soon. even if someone is ready the veto will always be there. Without Veto that group is useless.
france and uk arent superpower
 
france and uk arent superpower

They may not be but no one would like to share the power and would want to remain seen as powerful, more members mean the less significant the current members will become.
 
This year is at its end now. November and December are left, talk about getting a seat in 2017!
 
france and uk arent superpower

But they are the winners of WWII that founded UN. None of the 5 "bad guys" agrees on increase of permanent members with veto power. Increase of permanent members are OK, perhaps.
 
Back
Top Bottom