What's new

India, UAE Train Guns on Pakistan

well if you do the math
30 billion for india's 1 billion population equals about 27 dollars per person
6 billion for pakistans 200 million people equals around 30 dollars per person.
so basically we are getting more per capita...lol


my social fabric doesnt require non of these things...in fact our socialfabric simply requires us to support our army, our religion, our culture and way of life... while your pieces of shits want us to become baygharats like you people are who have no shame and want to be like europeans....
us normal pakistanis will always be the people who decide your destiny.... we are perfect mix and the future of pakistan... you liberal facists fucks along with your extremists brothers will be history in our country.


Not sure what's more funny, your intelligence level or the ones who thanked you for this jewel.
 
.
to the pakistanis on here. The UAE is the most hawkish and crazy of all GCC states. So you shouldnt be suprised they dont give a damn about pakistan anymore after yemen.

But if i were you guys, i would start worrying if the UAE drags saudi arabia into the game because if the saudis turn their back on pakistan, its curtains for you guys
 
.
11259471_10153262502658143_2306547119462052881_n.jpg
 
. .
Good job generalizing everyone based off a few, well done, keep telling yourself that if it makes you feel better about yourself.


You know what never mind ive reiterated my point many times but it has fallen on deaf ears, of course all of us arabs think badly of pakistanis and treat you badly and look down on you, of course we all suck up to the west. I can understand why you hate us arrogant, stupid, rich rag heads.

Generalizing? Where are living mate? i in middle east more then ten years and i know each and every movement very well and 80 to 90% Arabs in UAE are like that only.
 
.
The arbi guy seems to b like, "The f*ck do I do?"
Nothing more.
to the pakistanis on here. The UAE is the most hawkish and crazy of all GCC states. So you shouldnt be suprised they dont give a damn about pakistan anymore after yemen.

But if i were you guys, i would start worrying if the UAE drags saudi arabia into the game because if the saudis turn their back on pakistan, its curtains for you guys
Saudis wont do that, I am sure, at least they want Makkah and Madinah secured....
And they want us on their back one way or the other.
 
.
Indians are portraying as if uae is uncle sam that will distroy Pakistan to please india.

Grow up guys. Arab countries have no say in pak india relations, neither they have any say in uno.

It was entertaining to saw how these Arabs behaved in yemen issue.
Arabd states are nothing but losers.

Arab countries have no say in Palestine either lol
 
.
The arbi guy seems to b like, "The f*ck do I do?"
Nothing more.

Saudis wont do that, I am sure, at least they want Makkah and Madinah secured....
And they want us on their back one way or the other.
What does the bold part mean ,that has nothing to do with Pakistan anyway.
 
. .
india's been trying since the cold war and failed consistently....never bad to keep trying though, it's entertaining

you tried even in Afghanistan and we saw how well that went for you

How do you think US won the cold war?? Ever pondered??
 
.
How do you think US won the cold war?? Ever pondered??

Because of a global coalition of the willing, political infighting and fractions within the USSR admin (for e.g. hardliner soviets witch hunt against peace-makers like Gorbachav - not sure how to spell his name)....anti soviet movements within former soviet satellite states (goes hand in hand with point number one)

what's your point? You want to emulate that against Pakistan

try it and see how well it goes.....Pakistan's got plenty of tricks up it's own sleeves. Two can play at "chanakya" games
 
. .
Because of a global coalition of the willing, political infighting and fractions within the USSR admin (for e.g. hardliner soviets witch hunt against peace-makers like Gorbachav - not sure how to spell his name)....anti soviet movements within former soviet satellite states (goes hand in hand with point number one)

what's your point? You want to emulate that against Pakistan

try it and see how well it goes.....Pakistan's got plenty of tricks up it's own sleeves. Two can play at "chanakya" games

Both Soviet Union and US had advanced weapons and were technologically advanced countries. One was democratic/capitalist and other communist/socialistic governments. But one of them had better narrative than the other and that country prevailed in the end.

With Pakistan and India, we were separated because of ideological differences. You were shaped by two nation theory/Islamic and we were shaped by secular/pluralistic platforms. We have already seen cracks with the theory that shaped your country with the formation of Bangladesh. One Islamic/Muslim identity was supposed to cement your unity, but we have witnessed recently, with the escalation of sectarian violence, how fragile is that union of yours.
 
.
Both Soviet Union and US had advanced weapons and were technologically advanced countries. One was democratic/capitalist and other communist/socialistic governments. But one of them had better narrative than the other and that country prevailed in the end.

With Pakistan and India, we were separated because of ideological differences. You were shaped by two nation theory/Islamic and we were shaped by secular/pluralistic platforms. We have already seen cracks with the theory that shaped your country with the formation of Bangladesh. One Islamic/Muslim identity was supposed to cement your unity, but we have witnessed recently, with the escalation of sectarian violence, how fragile is that union of yours.

We've seen more cracks in india. 22 separtist movements in india, akhand Bharat is just a myth. That was proven in 1947.

By the way - caste violence and ethnic/communal issues are some of the most recurring problems in india. Those who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones buddy
 
.
Both Soviet Union and US had advanced weapons and were technologically advanced countries. One was democratic/capitalist and other communist/socialistic governments. But one of them had better narrative than the other and that country prevailed in the end.

With Pakistan and India, we were separated because of ideological differences. You were shaped by two nation theory/Islamic and we were shaped by secular/pluralistic platforms. We have already seen cracks with the theory that shaped your country with the formation of Bangladesh. One Islamic/Muslim identity was supposed to cement your unity, but we have witnessed recently, with the escalation of sectarian violence, how fragile is that union of yours.


We are separated by far more than ideological differences. Over 95% of Pakistanis have absolutely nothing in common with indians. We look physically different from indian people. We have a different racial, cultural, religious and genetic heritage to that of indian people. We have different beliefs to them. There is no common ground. Ultimately it was racial differences that separated Pakistan and Bangladesh. As Pakistanis we have combined our unique heritage with Islam which gives us our identity.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom