What's new

India to slap tariffs on 28 US products on Sunday

CHN Bamboo

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Oct 1, 2014
Messages
1,980
Reaction score
1
Country
China
Location
China
https://www.rt.com/news/461965-india-slaps-tariffs-us-products/

India said it will on Sunday impose higher tariffs on 28 US products, including almonds, apples and walnuts, in response to Washington’s withdrawal of key trade privileges for New Delhi.

The US goods affected by the Indian tariffs include iron and steel products, flat-rolled stainless steel, boric acid, tube and pipe fittings, screws, bolts and rivets. The hikes also target food products such as walnuts, chickpeas, lentils, apples, pears and artemia shrimps.

The new tariffs would allow India to receive around $217 million additional revenue from US imports, a source told the Times of India earlier.



An order to raise import taxes as high as 120 percent on a number of American-made goods was issued by the Indian government in June 2018. But it was delayed by New Delhi on several occasions as its trade talks with Washington were ongoing.

The standoff between New Delhi and Washington began last March, when US President Donald Trump imposed 25 per cent import duty on steel and 10 per cent tariffs on aluminum products. Being a major exporter of those items to the American market, India was hit hard by the move, losing around $240 million.

The sides tried to find common ground for over a year, but the trade talks collapsed earlier in June after the US withdrew export incentives to Indian companies under its Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) program, affecting $5.5 billion-worth of goods.

The US and India have been major trade partners during the past decade, with turnover between them standing at over $142 billion in 2018.
 
Last edited:
. . . .
Tit for tat , we just replied USA with same language.
@Nilgiri @Beast @beijingwalker @KAL-EL @Imran Khan

Its pretty minimal from both ends. Bout 200 million at most either way.

US - India trade is much more significant in services and no trade "war" there.

Being a major exporter of those items to the American market, India was hit hard by the move, losing around $240 million.

India didn't lose this amount, simply it no longer gets a discount (on about 6 billion worth of goods) that is valued at this amount anymore. We will have to actually wait and see how elastic/inelastic the 6 billion worth of goods are actually affected to count as a "loss" in real terms for the trade itself.

Wrong, It allow others to give India cheaper goods. US will be a looser

It depends on the goods inelasticity. Not everything is perfectly substitutable by others and oneself etc. What cannot be substituted (or foregone thru demand compression) manifests as increased revenue that comes from the domestic consumer....rather than the outside supplier.
 
.
Wrong, It allow others to give India cheaper goods. US will be a looser
Maybe but article is clearly referring to the money India could gain from tariffs. As tariffs are paid by the importer to government of India and passed on as price increases to customers.

Its pretty minimal from both ends. Bout 200 million at most either way.

US - India trade is much more significant in services and no trade "war" there.


.

what trade in services ? the over inflated IT exports where onsite billings are calculated as exports ?
 
.
Its pretty minimal from both ends. Bout 200 million at most either way.

US - India trade is much more significant in services and no trade "war" there.



India didn't lose this amount, simply it no longer gets a discount (on about 6 billion worth of goods) that is valued at this amount anymore. We will have to actually wait and see how elastic/inelastic the 6 billion worth of goods are actually affected to count as a "loss" in real terms for the trade itself.



It depends on the goods inelasticity. Not everything is perfectly substitutable by others and oneself etc. What cannot be substituted (or foregone thru demand compression) manifests as increased revenue that comes from the domestic consumer....rather than the outside supplier.
You caught my point:cheers:
 
. .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom