What's new

India needs to create more salaried jobs: World Bank

beijingwalker

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Messages
65,195
Reaction score
-55
Country
China
Location
China
India needs to create more salaried jobs: World Bank
More salaried jobs a must if India is to join the global middle class by 2047, says World Bank
Last Published: Wed, Feb 14 2018. 08 38 AM IST
Asit Ranjan Mishra
w_jobs-khFC--621x414@LiveMint.jpg

Less than a fifth of the workers in India are in salaried jobs, says World Bank. Graphic: Mint

New Delhi: India needs to create regular, salaried jobs with growing earnings rather than self-employed ones in order to join the ranks of the global middle class by 2047—the centenary of its Independence, the World Bank said in a draft Systematic Country Diagnostic (SCD) for India.

The bank said in a society with wide inequalities, the most urgent priority is to create productive, regular jobs.

“The issue is not just the number of jobs but also the type of jobs. A transition into the middle class calls for the creation of salaried jobs, which is a rare privilege in India today where less than a fifth of workers are in salaried employment,” the World Bank said in a first-of-its-kind draft report published on its website, seeking comments from stakeholders.

India has been classed a lower-middle income country for a decade and aspires to move a step up in the global prosperity ladder.

Globally, low-income countries are those with real per capita GDP less than 5% of that in the US in purchasing power parity (PPP) terms; lower-middle income countries are those with 5-15% per capita incomes of that in the US; and upper-middle income countries are those with 15-35% per capita incomes of that in the US. High-income countries are those above that line, including some even above the US’ income level.

The Economic Survey 2017-18 said if per capita income in India grows at 6.5% per year, India will reach upper-middle income status by the mid-to-late 2020s.

India attained lower middle-income status in 2008 and today has a per capita income of $6,538 (in 2011 PPP terms), which is 12% of the US. In 1960, India was a low income country with a per capita income (in PPP terms) of $1,033. This was equivalent to about 6% of US per capita income at the time.

The SCD is an analytical exercise that the World Bank conducts in all countries.

It articulates, from the perspective of the World Bank Group, an analysis of the most important opportunities and challenges to achieving, in that country, the two goals the Group holds itself accountable for—eliminating extreme poverty and boosting shared prosperity.

The World Bank warned that with an increasing number of youths needing employment, the jobs deficit that India faces has the potential to turn the much-awaited demographic dividend into a demographic curse.

“A growth strategy that focuses on productivity-led economic growth and good jobs will ensure not only that growth is inclusive but that growth is sustainable,” it said.

Between 2005 and 2012, the Indian economy generated about 3 million new jobs per year, while an extra 13 million people entered the working age population each year. There is no recent credible jobs data as India conducts the comprehensive employment-unemployment surveys only once in five years. A recent claim in a State Bank of India report—based on data from the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO)—that the economy generated 7 million jobs last year, has been contested by many economists.

The World Bank said reforms in land and labour markets in India would pay high dividends and help unshackle Indian businesses. “Well-functioning land markets require clearly defined property rights, a reliable land registry, and predictable processes for investment and changes in land-use... Flexible labour markets that facilitate the reallocation of workers in response to market conditions are important for productivity and job growth,” it said.

The existing stringent labour regulations create a segmented labour market with a high level of protection for a very small fraction of workers in jobs and high barriers for the entry of other workers into the protected segment of the formal labour market, the bank said.

“Going forward, “grandfathering” current workers covered under existing laws and introducing easy mechanisms for firms to buy workers out of their old contracts are possible options,” it added.
http://www.livemint.com/Politics/8z...-to-create-more-salaried-jobs-World-Bank.html
 
But the problem is if we need to do land and labour reforms, the govt needs a majority in both houses of Parliament. The Congress sure as hell isn't going to improve the country, so all of the focus is on BJP winning Karnataka in the 2018 elections. That way the BJP will have the chance of having a majority in both houses and they can pass the bills for new reforms if they win the general elections again. If the BJP doesn't dominate again, then reforms won't happen for many, many years.
 
But the problem is if we need to do land and labour reforms, the govt needs a majority in both houses of Parliament. The Congress sure as hell isn't going to improve the country, so all of the focus is on BJP winning Karnataka in the 2018 elections. That way the BJP will have the chance of having a majority in both houses and they can pass the bills for new reforms if they win the general elections again. If the BJP doesn't dominate again, then reforms won't happen for many, many years.
You spend too much time, money and valuable resources on political infighting and cutting the ground under rival parties feet.
 
You spend too much time, money and valuable resources on political infighting and cutting the ground under rival parties feet.

Time is definitely lost. Money, not so much. It costs CCP more money to stay in power than all of India's political infighting at the central and state level combined.

But for time to no longer be lost, we need BJP to come back in power again next year and get a majority in both houses. Once that's done, apart from land and labour reforms, they are planning to have major election reforms as well. That way, we can eradicate bad planning altogether.
 
It costs CCP more money to stay in power than all of India's political infighting at the central and state level combined.
Sure thing, cause CPC knows that the only way to stay in power is to get the Chinese people rich and the country prosperous so they put all the time and money in achieving those goals.
 
Time is definitely lost. Money, not so much. It costs CCP more money to stay in power than all of India's political infighting at the central and state level combined.

But for time to no longer be lost, we need BJP to come back in power again next year and get a majority in both houses. Once that's done, apart from land and labour reforms, they are planning to have major election reforms as well. That way, we can eradicate bad planning altogether.

Explain how.
 
2047 my a$$, Indian will slap world bank by becoming shupa pawah by 2020...take that world bank
 
India needs to create more salaried jobs: World Bank
More salaried jobs a must if India is to join the global middle class by 2047, says World Bank
Last Published: Wed, Feb 14 2018. 08 38 AM IST
Asit Ranjan Mishra
w_jobs-khFC--621x414@LiveMint.jpg

Less than a fifth of the workers in India are in salaried jobs, says World Bank. Graphic: Mint

New Delhi: India needs to create regular, salaried jobs with growing earnings rather than self-employed ones in order to join the ranks of the global middle class by 2047—the centenary of its Independence, the World Bank said in a draft Systematic Country Diagnostic (SCD) for India.

The bank said in a society with wide inequalities, the most urgent priority is to create productive, regular jobs.

“The issue is not just the number of jobs but also the type of jobs. A transition into the middle class calls for the creation of salaried jobs, which is a rare privilege in India today where less than a fifth of workers are in salaried employment,” the World Bank said in a first-of-its-kind draft report published on its website, seeking comments from stakeholders.

India has been classed a lower-middle income country for a decade and aspires to move a step up in the global prosperity ladder.

Globally, low-income countries are those with real per capita GDP less than 5% of that in the US in purchasing power parity (PPP) terms; lower-middle income countries are those with 5-15% per capita incomes of that in the US; and upper-middle income countries are those with 15-35% per capita incomes of that in the US. High-income countries are those above that line, including some even above the US’ income level.

The Economic Survey 2017-18 said if per capita income in India grows at 6.5% per year, India will reach upper-middle income status by the mid-to-late 2020s.

India attained lower middle-income status in 2008 and today has a per capita income of $6,538 (in 2011 PPP terms), which is 12% of the US. In 1960, India was a low income country with a per capita income (in PPP terms) of $1,033. This was equivalent to about 6% of US per capita income at the time.

The SCD is an analytical exercise that the World Bank conducts in all countries.

It articulates, from the perspective of the World Bank Group, an analysis of the most important opportunities and challenges to achieving, in that country, the two goals the Group holds itself accountable for—eliminating extreme poverty and boosting shared prosperity.

The World Bank warned that with an increasing number of youths needing employment, the jobs deficit that India faces has the potential to turn the much-awaited demographic dividend into a demographic curse.

“A growth strategy that focuses on productivity-led economic growth and good jobs will ensure not only that growth is inclusive but that growth is sustainable,” it said.

Between 2005 and 2012, the Indian economy generated about 3 million new jobs per year, while an extra 13 million people entered the working age population each year. There is no recent credible jobs data as India conducts the comprehensive employment-unemployment surveys only once in five years. A recent claim in a State Bank of India report—based on data from the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO)—that the economy generated 7 million jobs last year, has been contested by many economists.

The World Bank said reforms in land and labour markets in India would pay high dividends and help unshackle Indian businesses. “Well-functioning land markets require clearly defined property rights, a reliable land registry, and predictable processes for investment and changes in land-use... Flexible labour markets that facilitate the reallocation of workers in response to market conditions are important for productivity and job growth,” it said.

The existing stringent labour regulations create a segmented labour market with a high level of protection for a very small fraction of workers in jobs and high barriers for the entry of other workers into the protected segment of the formal labour market, the bank said.

“Going forward, “grandfathering” current workers covered under existing laws and introducing easy mechanisms for firms to buy workers out of their old contracts are possible options,” it added.
http://www.livemint.com/Politics/8z...-to-create-more-salaried-jobs-World-Bank.html

More than 80% of all Indian workforce are in "unorganized/informal sectors", and these people are not covered in any retirement plans. They either have to work to death or at the mercy of their children, and some lucky ones may save enough for old age. It is scary if you think about it. In a way, India is still a primitive society with one foot in modern world, one foot still stuck in Middle Ages.
 
Google isnt available for our chinese audience. Come on, back your claims you arent a liar arent you?:omghaha:

You do the leg work, it's easy to find this information. You will probably learn more by yourself.

The Chinese budget for internal security is as big as China's defence budget. Nobody else spends like that.
 
You do the leg work, it's easy to find this information. You will probably learn more by yourself.

The Chinese budget for internal security is as big as China's defence budget. Nobody else spends like that.

If its easy all the more you should prove to me that i am wrong. Your lack of substance is appalling.
 
India is a penny saving nation.

Its part of their psych. It takes generations to fix.
 
Last edited:

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom