What's new

India, Myanmar and Sri Lanka get tongue lashing from UN rights chief Prince Zeid

Banglar Bir

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Mar 19, 2006
Messages
7,805
Reaction score
-3
Country
United States
Location
United States
India, Myanmar and Sri Lanka get tongue lashing from UN rights chief Prince Zeid
SAM Report, September 13, 2017
prince_zeid.jpg

UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Prince Zeid Ra’ad bin Hussein
The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Prince Zeid Ra’ad bin Hussein, has give three countries in the South Asian region a tongue lashing for their callousness towards grave human rights issues. These are India, Myanmar and Sri Lanka.

In his opening speech at the 36 th.session of the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) in Geneva on Monday, Zeid “deplored” India’s decision to deport 40, 000 Rohingyas on the grounds that they are illegal immigrants.

“I deplore current measures in India to deport Rohingyas at a time of such violence against them in their country. Some 40,000 Rohingyas have settled in India, and 16,000 of them have received refugee documentation. The Minister of State for Home Affairs has reportedly said that because India is not a signatory to the Refugee Convention the country can dispense with international law on the matter, together with basic human compassion,” Zeid said.

“However, by virtue of customary law, its ratification of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the obligations of due process and the universal principle of non-refoulement. India cannot carry out collective expulsions, or return people to a place where they risk torture or other serious violations,” he added.

Increasing intolerance
Turning to the overall human rights situation in India, Zeid said: “I am also dismayed by a broader rise of intolerance towards religious and other minorities in India. The current wave of violent, and often lethal, mob attacks against people under the pretext of protecting the lives of cows is alarming. People who speak out for fundamental human rights are also threatened.”

“Gauri Lankesh, a journalist who tirelessly addressed the corrosive effect of sectarianism and hatred, was assassinated last week. I have been heartened by the subsequent marches calling for protection of the right to freedom of expression, and by demonstrations in 12 cities to protest the lynchings.”

“Human rights defenders who work for the rights of India’s most vulnerable groups – including those threatened with displacement by infrastructure projects such as the Sardar Sarovar Dam in the Narmada river valley – should be considered allies in building on India’s achievements to create a stronger and more inclusive society. Instead, many are subject to harassment and even criminal proceedings, or denied protection by the State.”

Appalling Conditions in Myanmar
On Myanmar he said: “I am appalled by reports that the Myanmar authorities have now begun to lay landmines along the border with Bangladesh, and to learn of official statements that refugees who have fled the violence will only be allowed back if they can provide proof of nationality”.

“Given that successive Myanmar governments have since 1962 progressively stripped the Rohingya population of their political and civil rights, including citizenship rights – as acknowledged by Aung San Suu Kyi’s own appointed Rakhine Advisory Commission – this measure resembles a cynical ploy to forcibly transfer large numbers of people without possibility of return.”

“Another brutal security operation is underway in Rakhine State – this time, apparently on a far greater scale. According to UNHCR, in less than three weeks over 270,000 people have fled to Bangladesh, three times more than the 87,000 who fled the previous operation.”

“Many more people reportedly remain trapped between Myanmar and Bangladesh. The operation, which is ostensibly in reaction to attacks by militants on 25 August against 30 police posts, is clearly disproportionate and without regard for basic principles of international law.”

“We have received multiple reports and satellite imagery of security forces and local militia burning Rohingya villages, and consistent accounts of extrajudicial killings, including shooting fleeing civilians.”

Text Book Ethnic Cleansing
What is going on in Myanmar is a “textbook case of ethnic cleansing” Prince Zeid said.

“Last year I warned that the pattern of gross violations of the human rights of the Rohingya suggested a widespread or systematic attack against the community, possibly amounting to crimes against humanity, if so established by a court of law. Because Myanmar has refused access to human rights investigators the current situation cannot yet be fully assessed, but the situation seems a textbook example of ethnic cleansing.”

“The Myanmar Government should stop claiming that the Rohingyas are setting fire to their own homes and laying waste to their own villages. This complete denial of reality is doing great damage to the international standing of a Government which, until recently, benefited from immense good will.”

“I call on the Government to end its current cruel military operation, with accountability for all violations that have occurred and to reverse the pattern of severe and widespread discrimination against the Rohingya population. I strongly urge the authorities to allow my Office unfettered access to the country.”

Extension of Universal Jurisdiction to Sri Lanka
As regards Sri Lanka, Zeid reiterated his demand for the extension of Universal Jurisdiction to Sri Lanka to enable courts in any part of the world to entertain war crimes cases against the Sri Lankan armed forces.

“The absence of credible action in Sri Lanka to ensure accountability for alleged violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law makes the exercise of universal jurisdiction even more necessary,” Zeid said in his opening speech at the 36th. session of the UNHRC in Geneva on Monday.

The UNHRC has been charging that in the final phase of Eelam Wa IV against the Tamil Tiger rebels, the Sri Lankan armed forces had committed war crimes.

“I urge the (Sri Lankan) Government to swiftly operationalize the Office of Missing Persons and to move faster on other essential confidence building measures, such as release of land occupied by the military, and resolving long-pending cases registered under the Prevention of Terrorism Act.”

“I repeat my request for that Act to be replaced with a new law in line with international human rights standards.”

“In the North, protests by victims indicate their growing frustration over the slow pace of reforms. I encourage the Government to act on its commitment in Resolution 30/1 to establish transitional justice mechanisms, and to establish a clear timeline and benchmarks for the implementation of these and other commitments. “

“This should not be viewed by the Government as a box-ticking exercise to placate the Council, but as an essential undertaking to address the rights of all its people,” Zeid said.

Impact of Universal Jurisdiction
In a sense, the Sri Lankan government has already accepted Universal Jurisdiction as in the last UNHRC resolution it co-sponsored, it “appreciated” Zeid’s recommendations which included Universal Jurisdiction.

However, in reality, whenever the issue of international action under Universal Jurisdiction against Sri Lankan army officers crops up, the Sri Lankan government categorically states that it will not allow any officer to be dragged to face trial in any foreign court.

President Maithipala Sirisena had himself said this recently, when a Former Army Commander and Ambassador in Brazil Gen. Jagath Jayasuriya, was issued a summons by a court in Brazil for alleged war crimes. Gen. Jayasuriya had escaped arrest as he had finished his tenure and left the country by the time the summons was issued.

But Gen. Jayasuriya’s predecessor as Army Chief, Field Marshal Sarath Fonseka has charged that Gen. Jayasuriya had committed war crimes when he was in charge of captured Tamil Tiger cadres in Vavuniya though he was not commanding any fighting unit.

The current Army Chief Lt. Gen.Mahesh Senanayake ticked off Field Marshal Fonseka for letting down army personnel to settle personal scores. Fonseka and Jayasuriya have been at daggers drawn for long.
http://southasianmonitor.com/2017/0...t-tongue-lashing-un-rights-chief-prince-zeid/
 
. . .
Its irony that India helped Bengalis from the oppressor "West Pakistan" but not rohingya against Burmese as reason for Indians are same..
1. influx of refugees in india
2. oppressor regime
3. human crisis
 
.
Its irony that India helped Bengalis from the oppressor "West Pakistan" but not rohingya against Burmese as reason for Indians are same..
1. influx of refugees in india
2. oppressor regime
3. human crisis

The influx of refugees from East Pakistan was unprecedented due to the crackdown. The border was porous and Pakistan was hostile to India.

The government of Burma is friendly with India, we understand their part of the story as well. Rohingya pose security threat as their association with Pakistani establishment is well known. Previous UPA government was compromised they took money from SA NGOs and planted them close to the Pakistani border.

Taking the sample from this forum the mindset of average Muslim against India and Indians is quite visible. The number of Hindus that are migrating from Pakistan adds to our response.
 
.
Pakistan was hostile to India
this is the only reason India created "Muktis" and arm them and even Modi still credit for that.. Indra didn't have ounce off sympathy as she shown on media for BDs
Pakistani establishment is well known
you serious :o::o::o:
average Muslim against India and Indians is quite visible
of Pakistan? yes, its due to enmity ... not all Muslims hate India as state....
 
.
India, Myanmar and Sri Lanka get tongue lashing from UN rights chief Prince Zeid
SAM Report, September 13, 2017
prince_zeid.jpg

UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Prince Zeid Ra’ad bin Hussein
The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Prince Zeid Ra’ad bin Hussein, has give three countries in the South Asian region a tongue lashing for their callousness towards grave human rights issues. These are India, Myanmar and Sri Lanka.

In his opening speech at the 36 th.session of the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) in Geneva on Monday, Zeid “deplored” India’s decision to deport 40, 000 Rohingyas on the grounds that they are illegal immigrants.

“I deplore current measures in India to deport Rohingyas at a time of such violence against them in their country. Some 40,000 Rohingyas have settled in India, and 16,000 of them have received refugee documentation. The Minister of State for Home Affairs has reportedly said that because India is not a signatory to the Refugee Convention the country can dispense with international law on the matter, together with basic human compassion,” Zeid said.

“However, by virtue of customary law, its ratification of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the obligations of due process and the universal principle of non-refoulement. India cannot carry out collective expulsions, or return people to a place where they risk torture or other serious violations,” he added.

Increasing intolerance
Turning to the overall human rights situation in India, Zeid said: “I am also dismayed by a broader rise of intolerance towards religious and other minorities in India. The current wave of violent, and often lethal, mob attacks against people under the pretext of protecting the lives of cows is alarming. People who speak out for fundamental human rights are also threatened.”

“Gauri Lankesh, a journalist who tirelessly addressed the corrosive effect of sectarianism and hatred, was assassinated last week. I have been heartened by the subsequent marches calling for protection of the right to freedom of expression, and by demonstrations in 12 cities to protest the lynchings.”

“Human rights defenders who work for the rights of India’s most vulnerable groups – including those threatened with displacement by infrastructure projects such as the Sardar Sarovar Dam in the Narmada river valley – should be considered allies in building on India’s achievements to create a stronger and more inclusive society. Instead, many are subject to harassment and even criminal proceedings, or denied protection by the State.”

Appalling Conditions in Myanmar
On Myanmar he said: “I am appalled by reports that the Myanmar authorities have now begun to lay landmines along the border with Bangladesh, and to learn of official statements that refugees who have fled the violence will only be allowed back if they can provide proof of nationality”.

“Given that successive Myanmar governments have since 1962 progressively stripped the Rohingya population of their political and civil rights, including citizenship rights – as acknowledged by Aung San Suu Kyi’s own appointed Rakhine Advisory Commission – this measure resembles a cynical ploy to forcibly transfer large numbers of people without possibility of return.”

“Another brutal security operation is underway in Rakhine State – this time, apparently on a far greater scale. According to UNHCR, in less than three weeks over 270,000 people have fled to Bangladesh, three times more than the 87,000 who fled the previous operation.”

“Many more people reportedly remain trapped between Myanmar and Bangladesh. The operation, which is ostensibly in reaction to attacks by militants on 25 August against 30 police posts, is clearly disproportionate and without regard for basic principles of international law.”

“We have received multiple reports and satellite imagery of security forces and local militia burning Rohingya villages, and consistent accounts of extrajudicial killings, including shooting fleeing civilians.”

Text Book Ethnic Cleansing
What is going on in Myanmar is a “textbook case of ethnic cleansing” Prince Zeid said.

“Last year I warned that the pattern of gross violations of the human rights of the Rohingya suggested a widespread or systematic attack against the community, possibly amounting to crimes against humanity, if so established by a court of law. Because Myanmar has refused access to human rights investigators the current situation cannot yet be fully assessed, but the situation seems a textbook example of ethnic cleansing.”

“The Myanmar Government should stop claiming that the Rohingyas are setting fire to their own homes and laying waste to their own villages. This complete denial of reality is doing great damage to the international standing of a Government which, until recently, benefited from immense good will.”

“I call on the Government to end its current cruel military operation, with accountability for all violations that have occurred and to reverse the pattern of severe and widespread discrimination against the Rohingya population. I strongly urge the authorities to allow my Office unfettered access to the country.”

Extension of Universal Jurisdiction to Sri Lanka
As regards Sri Lanka, Zeid reiterated his demand for the extension of Universal Jurisdiction to Sri Lanka to enable courts in any part of the world to entertain war crimes cases against the Sri Lankan armed forces.

“The absence of credible action in Sri Lanka to ensure accountability for alleged violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law makes the exercise of universal jurisdiction even more necessary,” Zeid said in his opening speech at the 36th. session of the UNHRC in Geneva on Monday.

The UNHRC has been charging that in the final phase of Eelam Wa IV against the Tamil Tiger rebels, the Sri Lankan armed forces had committed war crimes.

“I urge the (Sri Lankan) Government to swiftly operationalize the Office of Missing Persons and to move faster on other essential confidence building measures, such as release of land occupied by the military, and resolving long-pending cases registered under the Prevention of Terrorism Act.”

“I repeat my request for that Act to be replaced with a new law in line with international human rights standards.”

“In the North, protests by victims indicate their growing frustration over the slow pace of reforms. I encourage the Government to act on its commitment in Resolution 30/1 to establish transitional justice mechanisms, and to establish a clear timeline and benchmarks for the implementation of these and other commitments. “

“This should not be viewed by the Government as a box-ticking exercise to placate the Council, but as an essential undertaking to address the rights of all its people,” Zeid said.

Impact of Universal Jurisdiction
In a sense, the Sri Lankan government has already accepted Universal Jurisdiction as in the last UNHRC resolution it co-sponsored, it “appreciated” Zeid’s recommendations which included Universal Jurisdiction.

However, in reality, whenever the issue of international action under Universal Jurisdiction against Sri Lankan army officers crops up, the Sri Lankan government categorically states that it will not allow any officer to be dragged to face trial in any foreign court.

President Maithipala Sirisena had himself said this recently, when a Former Army Commander and Ambassador in Brazil Gen. Jagath Jayasuriya, was issued a summons by a court in Brazil for alleged war crimes. Gen. Jayasuriya had escaped arrest as he had finished his tenure and left the country by the time the summons was issued.

But Gen. Jayasuriya’s predecessor as Army Chief, Field Marshal Sarath Fonseka has charged that Gen. Jayasuriya had committed war crimes when he was in charge of captured Tamil Tiger cadres in Vavuniya though he was not commanding any fighting unit.

The current Army Chief Lt. Gen.Mahesh Senanayake ticked off Field Marshal Fonseka for letting down army personnel to settle personal scores. Fonseka and Jayasuriya have been at daggers drawn for long.
http://southasianmonitor.com/2017/0...t-tongue-lashing-un-rights-chief-prince-zeid/
Tongue lashing? Seems like this article was written by a sanghi yellow journalist.
 
.
this is the only reason India created "Muktis" and arm them and even Modi still credit for that.. Indra didn't have ounce off sympathy as she shown on media for BDs

you serious :o::o::o:

of Pakistan? yes, its due to enmity ... not all Muslims hate India as state....

Can you stick to the discussion than taking it everywhere?

Tongue lashing? Seems like this article was written by a sanghi yellow journalist.

I thought posters on PDF only read headlines to make their minds.

You failed even that.

You need to go to a better school. Lol

you serious :o::o::o:

Yes I am.

of Pakistan? yes, its due to enmity ... not all Muslims hate India as state...

I hope you are right.
 
Last edited:
.
You are right they should not have been taken in the first place.
Whether sanghi/bjp want or not, Rohingya will live in India.India is not the personal property of the sanghi terrorist.200 million Indian Muslims want Rohingya to stay and that is final.
 
.
Whether sanghi/bjp want or not, Rohingya will live in India.India is not the personal property of the sanghi terrorist.200 million Indian Muslims want Rohingya to stay and that is final.

Mind your own business Bangladeshi terrorist, you have no say in Indian affairs.

You are same Bangladeshis who used to run away with tail between legs when asked about accepting Rohingya.

Suddenly your hormonal ummah has found an expression after getting money from SA. Where were you when your forces were killing these defenceless refugees and drowning their boats?
 
.
Mind your own business Bangladeshi terrorist, you have no say in Indian affairs.

You are same Bangladeshis who used to run away with tail between legs when asked about accepting Rohingya.

Suddenly your hormonal ummah has found an expression after getting money from SA. Where were you when your forces were killing these defenceless refugees and drowning their boats?
How many rohyngas are their in India?
By you location flag you live in New Zealand. Now what if new Zealand wants you out based on your skin tone, ethinicity or religion? I want to know how you would react? But off I won't get an honest answer.
 
.
Whether sanghi/bjp want or not, Rohingya will live in India.India is not the personal property of the sanghi terrorist.200 million Indian Muslims want Rohingya to stay and that is final.


Its not BJP /Sanghi decision, its Indian Decision not even Muslim or Hindu, If any Muslim want to support Rohingya over Indians they are free to go to any country which they feel is better.

We will decide based on our interest , we have enough of moral politics in all these years, If Myanmar is important to us, we will support it.Let so called Ummah take care of Rohingya.
 
.
Lol coming from a Jordanian royal its pretty rich (anyone remember what Jordan did to PLO and all the palestinians taking refuge around the PLO areas?....it wasn't pretty). Let's see him criticize King Hussein and Hashemite monarchy for that action, first and foremost before opening his mouth on anything else.

Yet UN appoints such character to be a "human rights" chief.....just like countries that behead and stone gay people as part of official policy have been members in such HRO departments and commitees too.

UN is such a non-credible entity on such matters given it fundamentally doesn't understand it cannot escape the basic existence of "let he who has not sinned, cast the first stone".

200 million Indian Muslims want Rohingya to stay and that is final.

Majority muslims in UP voted BJP in last state election. Have a good cry dummy. A rotten failed butthurt like you in BD can NEVER talk for all muslims in India.

Plenty of Muslims in India absolutely hate you Bangladeshis....just ask the muslims in assam for example. They want all your illegals sent back to where they came from because they give their own community a bad name by disguising as such but keep indulging in BD-style disgraceful activities.

Now don't you have some BD ppl to peel off the barbed wire at our border... while opening wide and hard to accept MM rohingya gifts in their sector? Shoo.
 
.
Now don't you have some BD ppl to peel off the barbed wire at our border... while opening wide and hard to accept MM rohingya gifts in their sector? Shoo.
It's Karma. They were looking for a population reduction and easy buck by sending their people to neighboring countries flooding the market with cheap labor, now that they have to take a million back home.....

I'm hoping for a similar exodus of illegals from India. Forget Assam, there is a lot of them here (Kerala) without any identities. Living in my place, fighting with each other, eve-teasing. Involved in drugs and other illegal activities. In many cases they disappear after committing crimes since they are not in records, they can't be tracked.
 
.
It's Karma. They were looking for a population reduction and easy buck by sending their people to neighboring countries flooding the market with cheap labor, now that they have to take a million back home.....

I'm hoping for a similar exodus of illegals from India. Forget Assam, there is a lot of them here (Kerala) without any identities. Living in my place, fighting with each other, eve-teasing. Involved in drugs and other illegal activities. In many cases they disappear after committing crimes since they are not in records, they can't be tracked.

This is basically how they achieved large portion of their census revision downwards and lower realised population growth within BD.

Then they cry foul when the long term chickens come home to roost.

Anyways its a start of a new era for BD (esp on the ground) relations with its two neighbours, the BD members here know it...and are trying to escape from reality of it as much as they can....by usual deflecting and diversion and last resort ad-hominem.

Their best buddy China helping MM immensely at the UN is just a small cherry on top.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom