What's new

India Likely To Acquire Tu-22M3 Supersonic Bombers

doe33

BANNED
Joined
Mar 10, 2017
Messages
950
Reaction score
0
Country
France
Location
India
Bombers.jpg


New Delhi: India seems likely to acquire four Tupolev Tu-22M3 “Backfire” twin-engine strategic bombers from Russia and will probably use these long-range jets on maritime strike missions to attack warships with volleys of modern anti-ship missiles (ASMs), including India’s own BrahMos-A.

When they arrive in India, the Backfires will become the country’s first long-range strategic bombers. Indian media said these four variable-wing jets should be sufficient to deter China from further expansion in the Indian Ocean.

In December 2015, China announced it would build a naval base for its People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) on the Seychelles, an Indian Ocean nation off the east coast of Africa.


Indian military analysts said the only conceivable deployment for the Tu-22M3 is to attack PLAN warships in the Indian Ocean and in the South China Sea. The jets have a range of 6,800 km, allowing them to venture out to the South China Sea from Visakhapatnam, headquarters of the Indian Navy’s Eastern Naval Command. The distance to the Seychelles is 4,000 km.

The Tu-22M3 was originally designed by the Soviet Union as a long-range maritime strike bomber armed with stand-off cruise missiles capable of attacking U.S. Navy carriers at very long-range.

India might choose to arm the Tu-22M3 with the air launched version of its BrahMos supersonic cruise missile, the BrahMos-A, or with the Russian cruise missiles it’s designed to launch: the Raduga Kh-22 and the Raduga Kh-15.

The Kh-22 has a range of 600 km and a 1,000 kg warhead. This weapon can also be armed with a nuclear warhead. The smaller Kh-15 with its 150 kg warhead is the world’s fastest aircraft-launched missile.

Backfires from the Thanjavur Air Force Base in southern India armed with the BrahMos-A can hunt down and hit PLAN warships in the Indian Ocean. The BrahMos-A can be modified to carry a nuclear warhead.

Russia currently uses its Tu-22M3s to bomb targets in Syria in support of the Syrian government. The jets rain down unguided “dumb bombs” on their targets, which the United States says are mostly resistance groups allied with it.

https://english.kolkata24x7.com/defense-news/india-likely-acquire-tu-22m3-supersonic-bombers
 
. . .
There has been unconfirmed rumours that we have has four of these since 2003 on lease . They were never confirmed.
No we don't have now..
But there were several reports including from Indian as well as from some Australian journals that we had 3 TU22M placed in Andaman.I think those were leased & were returned back in past.
 
.
There has been unconfirmed rumours that we have has four of these since 2003 on lease . They were never confirmed.
As per reports Indian secretly acquired F-22 since 2012 around 36 but they were never confirmed.

Shuper shonic yeah haaay....
Ye jahaaj bohat door tak dushman k mulk ko bhaid sakata hai aor iski shamta ka jahaaj na Pakistan k pass hai na cheen k pass.
 
. . . . .
As per reports Indian secretly acquired F-22 since 2012 around 36 but they were never confirmed.


Ye jahaaj bohat door tak dushman k mulk ko bhaid sakata hai aor iski shamta ka jahaaj na Pakistan k pass hai na cheen k pass.

Don't worry we might be paying for it and keeping it.

But it's for you only. From Russia with Love.
 
. .
These are relics. Made sense buying 20 years back.

What's the point of buying them now? We won't be invading anyone and whatever bombers used to do can be done with long range cruise missiles and that too without risking crew casualty.

This is just a wishlist article.
 
.
These are relics. Made sense buying 20 years back.

What's the point of buying them now? We won't be invading anyone and whatever bombers used to do can be done with long range cruise missiles and that too without risking crew casualty.

This is just a wishlist article.
Won't be bad for IOR region. packed with 12-16 cruise missiles and 6000+ km range, It can map IOR with fire power.
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom