What's new

India: Juvenile gets 3 years in reform home

.
No one said that for the other 1000 judgements when the same yardstick was applied. In any case, what do you think will happen? He'll serve 3 years and then they'll let him off. Then after 3 months they'll pick him up again on some trumped up charges and put him behind bars. Or likely they'll even make him 'disappear' altogether one day, making him leave behind some letter like 'I feel too ashamed' etc. This kind of decriminalizing is very common around our country. His goose is cooked, no matter which way you look at it. Trust me.

'Rape Charges against Asaram are a Congress Conspiracy'- a BJP leader


this was a nice debate.
both congressis and bjp were blabbering.
good thing is amee yagnik didn't lost her cool.
this debate changed everything for me and i just realize there is really no f@cking hindu and muslim thing.
it's just the vote bank politics.asaram is not behind the bars because nobody wants to loose there hindu vote bank.so no initiative from congress and bjp.

As per law, Judge could have allowed him to just walk free but it was public pressure which forced them to grant him highest sentence a juvenile could get, one more thing his this crime won't be recorded that means after 3 years he would have clean record.

It's high time India reduces juvenile age to 16 as per UN since in India 66% of juvenile crimes are commited by 16-18 age group adolescents.



That BJP leader is bastard.It's his personal views not the BJP's official stand while Gheylot is the CM of Rajsthan.

kindly watched the whole video.
both partys aren't taking initiative in the case of asaram because they don't want to loose hindu votebank.
we all know asaram has large no. of followers.
actually bjp and congress both manipulate the votes.
even modis statement was a big disappointment
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
really? in that case he should have been tried for murder

He was and convicted. Still same sentence though. Too many people going o & on about the "kid". He was 17 years & six months..... Whatever he was, he was no kid.
 
.
He was and convicted. Still same sentence though. Too many people going o & on about the "kid". He was 17 years & six months..... Whatever he was, he was no kid.

He is not a "Kid". I can stand for this statement anywhere in this world then let juvenile court see do they still stand on same argument even knowing this. They are the real one culprits. Everyone knows that he is aged well over 18 years. But juvenile board says that Matriculation certificate is GOD's written certificate which can't be bypassed & overruled. Even the culprits mother accepted that certificate DOB is correct she not sure about this but save her child she will not speak further. And principal of the school also admitted the same.
Here I am saying in my full consciousness that DOB in my matriculation certificate is 10 December 1990 while my original DOB is 31 August 1989. In back those times in rural areas people didn't care about DOB much, so whatever teacher of school wrote on DOB, everyone accepted without recognizing the loss & gains.

And this is where this rapist took the advantage or should I say that Juvenile justice board gave the advantage by colluding the culprit. So that they can show that they are supreme in India when it comes to juvenile cases.

I would like to know that if there is any way by which this decision can be changed or not.
 
.
There was a post from one of my FB friend which i thought was relevant....

"When Sanjay dutt wakes up today and reads the newspaper he would wish that he should have been below 18 when he bought illegal ammunition. Salman might want to fight his case saying that he drove his car in a drunk state killing pavement dwellers when he was 17"
 
.
.
In US he would definitely be treated as an adult. Not only was he barely a minor but also the sheer viciousness of his actions calls for him to be treated as an adult. An adult who will be a threat to the society when released.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom