India fails to silence BBC film

[duhastmish]

What can British do if they watch it over and over.

Indian society needs to change and Brits can't do shyt about it

 

[Steve781]

The only thing that matters is how many Indians see it, everything else is a sideshow.

Then why the fuss over the showing in a foreign country where nobody even bothered to watch it and when Youtube makes sure to take it down?

 

[Guynextdoor2]

She says she herself was raped. Why didnt she make a film about her own rapist in UK ?

Don't be insensitive

Then why the fuss over the showing in a foreign country where nobody even bothered to watch it and when Youtube makes sure to take it down?

Who' fussing? It's only the government that's acting stupid. Most people in the society are not only pro watching it but sharing as much as possible.

 

[Anmol]

There is no point in my view to ban film unless

1. If She had taken consent of Nirbhayas parents... No she did not.Parents had also asked Journo not to show her photos and identity.

2. She used documentry for commercial purposes..she gives graphical detail of hw the rape was done.

3. The law of land both in india and UK prevents graphical dipiction.

4. The case is subjudice and interviwer was not right in airing documentry.

All in all it was purely to sensationalize and mint some money out of documentry.

 

[JohnyD]

one thing is for sure, many and most men think like that bludy rapist...!

 

[Sam.]

USA ( 316 M ) | rapes (total) = 84767 | rapes/100,000 people = 27.3
India ( 1.26 B ) | rapes (total) = 22172 | rapes/100,000 people = 1.8

SOURCE : Rape statistics - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia