What's new

India Casts Wider Net for Short-Range Missiles

Indian Army

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Nov 9, 2011
Messages
238
Reaction score
0
India Casts Wider Net for Short-Range Missiles

NEW DELHI - The Indian Army has entered the global market to buy short-range surface-to-air missile (SRSAM) systems for $1.5 billion, a move that could further undercut a four-year effort to develop a system with MBDA of France.

The Army convinced the Indian Defence Ministry there is an urgent requirement for SRSAM, said Army sources, and did not want to wait for the Maitri project conceived four years ago. India and France have not been able to agree on details of the Maitri project, including funding arrangements, the source added.

The Army last month sent global tenders to defense companies in Europe, the United States and Russia including Raytheon of the U.S., Israel's Rafael, MBDA and Thales of France, Diehl Defence of Germany, KBP Tula and Rosoboronexport of Russia, Ukraineexport of Ukraine and LIG NEX1 of South Korea.

The requirements of the SRSAM are similar to those of the proposed Indo-French Maitri project, the Army source said.

The current tender is for two regiments (36 systems, 1,000 missiles) estimated to cost about $800 million each. The total Indian Army requirement is likely to be about eight regiments in the next five to seven years.

The Maitri project was proposed to be jointly developed by India's Defence Research and Development Laboratory and MBDA.

The selected vendor will have to transfer technology of the systems, as well.

The supply will be made in two batches and completed within five years of the signing of the tender, including the launchers, sensors, vehicles for transportation and the missiles. The system must have a service life of at least 20 years and the missiles of not less than eight years.

The SRSAM system should be able to engage multiple targets, including those flying up to 500 meters per second, and have a maximum range of not less than 15 kilometers.

In 2009, India bought two regiments of Spyder quick-reaction surface-to-air missile systems from Rafael. Another Indo-Israeli joint project is the $2.5 billion long-range surface-to-air missile project signed in 2009 and expected to be inducted in 2013, Indian Defence Ministry sources said.

Meanwhile, the Indian Army has begun inducting the homemade medium-range Akash, which has a range of up to 30 kilometers. In 2011, the Indian Army ordered the induction of two Akash regiments at a cost of about $3 billion.

The Army also has been negotiating the purchase of David Sling and Iron Dome missile interceptor systems.

India Casts Wider Net for Short-Range Missiles - Defense News
 
.
hmmmm decide MMRCA buddy. im eagerly waiting for results.
 
. . .
My god so many defence deals? Where are we getting the money to buy all this stuff? And this is definitely not for Pakistan. :undecided:
 
. .
The Army also has been negotiating the purchase of David Sling and Iron Dome missile interceptor systems.
This is something new...I think IA should wait for Maetri because their requirement is too much and this could be used to develop our own market. Either this or go ahead with the purchase of more Spyder QRSAM.
 
. .
This is something new...I think IA should wait for Maetri because their requirement is too much and this could be used to develop our own market. Either this or go ahead with the purchase of more Spyder QRSAM.

Both France n India could not take decision on Maitri regarding funds, infra and IA don't wanna delay requirement of SRSAM for another 3-4 years. Thats why IA had to opt for these procurement.
 
.
Ming boggling man! Awesome! btw, did you guys checkout the new rifle from Trichy ordinance factory.

Here we go!!!!

HMxLi.jpg


_762mm_SIG-551.jpg
 
. .
Both France n India could not take decision on Maitri regarding funds, infra and IA don't wanna delay requirement of SRSAM for another 3-4 years. Thats why IA had to opt for these procurement.
I know that but its not drdo's fault.
Either this or IA should induct 2 regiments of SRSAM from MBDA right now for immediate use and then after 3-4 years we can induct remaining 6 regiments but of MAETRI SAM. I am asking for MBDA's SRSAM because there will be similarities between Maetri and that SAM.
Also i read MBDA is pitching MAETRI for this deal. Now its upto IA to chose it or reject it.
 
.
The rifle stuff doesnt belong in this thread.

I wonder if India will ask Russia for a licence to make the s 300 like China is doing.
 
.
This is something new...I think IA should wait for Maetri because their requirement is too much and this could be used to develop our own market. Either this or go ahead with the purchase of more Spyder QRSAM.

Also i read MBDA is pitching MAETRI for this deal. Now its upto IA to chose it or reject it.

That's the problem imo, why is it upto IA to decided??? What do we have MoD for?
From the start I didn't understand why IA and IAF needs to have different SR SAM procurements, because technically they can't have different requirements. The idea of a co-development of Maitri SAM was the better choice imo, so MoD should have intervened right there and forced IAF to take the same route and get a common requirement for that co-development with IA.
Similarly, if IA now don't want the co-development anymore, MoD must force them to take the Spyder SAM missile, that IAF will procure anyway. We just need to increased the order, the unit cost will be lower and since we already have SAM co-developments, it would be easy to combine it to an co-development too!
But instead MoD is just watching and letting the forces do as they want, delaying this procurement even further, since a competition will take a lot of time again and not to forget that the cost will increase too.
Also why the hell would IA reject the Maitri SAM development with the French and then evaluate their missiles again? Similarly, can't they just take the evaluation results of IAFs SR SAM competition instead of testing all missiles from the start again?

It's really getting annoying to see our forces compete each other when it comes to procurements because of pride reasons and MoD not showing anykind of leadership too. As if they all have different aims, although the security of India and more efficiency in the forces should be the common aim isn't?
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom