India asked to stop work on Kishanganga and Ratle projects

[war&peace]

Then you clearly are too young to own nuclear weapons... Its not a weapon you should threaten to use if your neighbour builds a dam you dont like. Its actually quite scary how eagerly you seem to want to see nuclear winter.
If Pakistan uses nuclear weapons on India, you would too be wiped from earth.

These weapons are not made for showcase...these are meant to be used when appropriate and the only country has already used immediately after 48 days of its experiment is your master ad you lick his boots ,,,so if you have courage go tell that to him...but how he is your master and calls shots and you like a tamed monkey dance on his directions.. so STFU...btw what is the concern of Finland...Oh I see another false flagger..

 

[PAKISTANI LEOPARD]

If India is going to violate Indus Water Treaty then must be stopped to do so. If not agreed then look other options too

 

[BABA AGHORI]

Why should it be 50/50?

93% of the Indus River flows through Pakistan, 5% through India, and 2% through China. What ever percentage flows through each country is what the percentage of access each country should have to the water.

India should stop being greedy and trying to force Pakistan into a war.

This is not how world works.. Checks what is the official stand of China on the waters of the rivers that flows to other countries.

 

[Samrat420]

These weapons are not made for showcase...these are meant to be used when appropriate and the only country has already used immediately after 48 days of its experiment is your master ad you lick his boots ,,,so if you have courage go tell that to him...but how he is your master and calls shots and you like a tamed monkey dance on his directions.. so STFU...btw what is the concern of Finland...Oh I see another false flagger..

Its quite funny when Pakistanis accuse others of being boot-lickers..

 

[Ram Mahadev]

OK we will stop ASAP.

 

[khanmubashir]

Resolve what? These dams do not store water. These are hydro power plants/dams and will benefit Kashmir.

Of Western River only 20% but u can't make such construction which interrupt water flow to Pakistan our main case WB is looking in 2 design if it interrupt water flow
From the rivers flowing in India, India got nearly 33 million acre feet (MAF) from eastern rivers whereas Pakistan got nearly 125 MAF from western rivers.[16] However India can use the western river waters for irrigation up to 701,000 acres with new water storage capacity not exceeding 1.25 MAF and use the rivers for run of river hydro power generation with storage not exceeding 1.6 MAF and nominal flood storage capacity of 0.75 MAFhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indus_Waters_Treaty

 

[vikata]

Better will be solve to it peacefully otherwie it will surely cause a nuclear war and there would be no India except ash and smoke.

u ppl and your nuclear rant
what else u have got apart from nuclear weapon and cpec
it is probably PDF only

 

[prashantazazel]

First start using your share rather than wasting it.

 

[Tiger Genie]

The half dozen or so Pakistani origin people I know in the tri-state area are such smart and wise people. It is such a polar opposite of the Pakistani posters in this thread. Guys, what part of 'India will use its full share per IWT' do you not understand? Are you guys made this stupid or do you go to school to become this stupid?

 

[GHOSTS]

Better will be solve to it peacefully otherwie it will surely cause a nuclear war and there would be no India except ash and smoke.

Nuclear war over a Dam? lol kids these days.. [emoji1]

 

[somebozo]

I wonder what would be the reaction of fellow Pakistanis, in case Indian law makers pass a resolution to STOP CPEC work in disputed region of Kashmir.

We will just laugh at it..!

 

[Soulspeek]

We will just laugh at it..!

Thats why we are also laughing at resolution passed in Pakistan.

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

lol, remember India has more economic power then combine more then 150+ countries..... Water is stopped by China only belong to the rives which is pak, where will china take those stop water???
.

The economy of member countries of world bank is 100 times more than indian.
And for rivers watch the map.
And where will india keep stopped water and how will it save only hindu country from annihilation.

★ Actually India would be more than happy if both the eastern and western rivers are divided 50-50 between India and Pakistan. Currently, Pakistan has been gifted 81% of the combined water of these six rivers.. To say that India got 3 rivers and Pakistan got 3 is hugely misleading because the eastern rivers are much much smaller than the western ones.. The Indus alone is twice larger than Ravi, Satluj and Beas combined..

Water should be divided based on the population ratio living around those rivers natural flow.
Not by diverting it from those people to other areas.

Some clarifications regarding Indus water treaty.

The Flow in northern 3 rivers allotted to Pakistan is a lot higher than than southern 3 rivers allotted to India

Only 2 of the 6 Indus rivers originate in China, rest 4 originate in India.

As of Now Pakistan is entitled to receive some 79% waters from Indus water system.
But receives 88% of Indus waters and wastes nearly all of it.

As of now India only able to utilize 12% of Indus waters.


Were treaty be renegotiated on the 50 -50 water sharing of all 6 rivers or 50 -50 water sharing of 4 rivers originating in India and 33% waters sharing each for China - India - Pakistan, rest 2, that would be an equitable solution.

It was Nehru's naivety or decency, that he signed such a generous treaty, without think about future population growth in India.

Pakistan makes a lot of noise Indus waters, but when it takes matter to court, it does not have a legal leg to stand on and has lost nearly all the arbitration on Indus treaty.

Nehru saved you from wars. He foresaw current hostile situation under nuclear umbrella. He was a visionary leader.

First go and read IWT carefully . problem is even your experts are confused.. they don"t know whats written in treaty, world bank is just the broker in treaty not a guarantor.Read below .

WB not guarantor of Indus Water Treaty, Senate body told - The Nation
nation.com.pk/islamabad/.../wb-not-guarantor-of-indus-water-treaty-senate-body-told

[/QUOTE]
but india cannot break the treaty. No unilateral withdrawing lines included.
World bank is both broker and meditator.

 

[RazaGujjar]

Projects are being built on disputed land. Enough said.

In 1947, one of the biggest travesties in all of history happened with the failure to include all of Jammu and Kashmir (then 77% muslim) into Pakistan.

Even after 70 years of ethnic cleansing the valley is still predominately Muslim. You cannot silence them.

 

[Sloth 22]

we are ok with 50 50 share. but would you give our 50 share in the other 3 rivers given to india under IWT?
And you should have decided it when you signed it in first place. You would lose case every where after breaking the treaty and remember World bank is 193 countries.
and remember water is coming from china who would then do the same with moral justification as india would have already done that.

Only 2.57% of water in Brahmaputra comes from China. So we are immune from there.