Incursions in Ladakh, a prelude a coming war with China, says analyst Bhara

[kurup]

China has no need to fight India but when they try to demarcate the LAC they are met with slanderous and insidious allegations from the Indians its a barren wasteland and your getting all booty tickled about it, btw If China really wanted to they could have taken Tawang back into their control.

But they have not . How generous of the chinese ......

 

[vsdave2302]

We should just aim to never be weak again like we were during that famine.

Otherwise someone will try something, maybe not war but all sorts of other tricks.

Why are you so scarred in spite of being so called strong county spending more than 3 time on defense compare to India. Is it that hidden fear of being internally weak country which pretends to be strong.

 

[Slav Defence]

I doubt that pro-Indian lobbies have much power.

Hasn't helped them much on the border incidents.

Yes,I agree with you Mr.Chinese Dragon,as conditions of such countries are not ordinary and situation is not peaceful,first of all,second, it was just a cross-border incident,but there are possible chances that if both countries go on war in ordinary condition,China may experience heavy pressure,further more,as US and its allies are themselves engaged in war on terror,therefore it they are not in that much strong position to apply their pressure.
That is why they are planning to leave Afghanistan after 2041,due to trillions of loss,and imbalance produced,after they will leave,they will replenish themselves.
This is the best time for China to score,to increase her strength,remember,pro-Indian lobby can never afford to unstable,weak India as,it is a threat according to their hypothesis to Pakistan,due to which Pakistan is refrained some how to interfere in world affairs.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

Why are you so scarred in spite of being so called strong county spending more than 3 time on defense compare to India. Is it that hidden fear of being internally weak country which pretends to be strong.

Internal strength is the most important kind of strength.

If you think we are bluffing, then call our bluff next time there is an incursion.

As for defence spending, we spend less as a percentage of GDP than India. The reason the total budget is bigger is because China's economy is 4 times larger than India's.

This is the best time for China to score,to increase her strength,remember,pro-Indian lobby can never afford to unstable,weak India as,it is a threat according to their hypothesis to Pakistan,due to which Pakistan is refrained some how to interfere in world affairs.

We are increasing our strength every day, it is a never-ending process.

 

[AADHAAR]

If you think we are bluffing, then call our bluff next time there is an incursion.
.

Called your bluff.. that's why the "tent" isn't there.

There never was an India-China border in history ... and none considered each-other their "neighbours".

That changed only after PRC troops occupied Tibet by force in 1959.. and then moved into some parts of Ladakh (which was not even a part of Tibet, leave alone china).

I don't think border issue will be resolved, till Tibet is resolved.

That said, PRC can't change anything by force ... it couldn't do anything in 1962, 1987 or 2013 and won't be able to any time later.

 

[djsjs]

India has ten more times solders than China along the border. what are those fatheads doing there if they cann't stop our solders?
if ten times is not enough, what about 20 times?

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

Called your bluff.. that's why the "tent" isn't there.

There never was an India-China border in history ... and none considered each-other their "neighbours".

That changed only after PRC troops occupied Tibet by force in 1959.. and then moved into some parts of Ladakh (which was not even a part of Tibet, leave alone china).

I don't think border issue will be resolved, till Tibet is resolved.

That said, PRC can't change anything by force ... it couldn't do anything in 1962, 1987 or 2013 and won't be able to any time later.

Indian troops suspend patrols at Chumar - Times Of India

NEW DELHI: Apart from dismantling a SET of strategically-located bunkers at Chumar as part of an arrangement to end the standoff at Depsang Bulge in eastern Ladakh, the Indian troops seem to have suspended patrols to the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in Chumar, at least for now. Senior officials briefed by personnel on the ground said the Army has discontinued the round-the-clock patrolling it was undertaking in the area for the last few months.

 

[AADHAAR]

India has ten more times solders than China along the border. what are those fatheads doing there if they cann't stop our solders?
if ten times is not enough, what about 20 times?

There is agreement, not to fire in face-offs.

Good that sane senses prevailed both times, when the "tent" was rolled back peacefully .... as with the chinese "horse and pony" incursions reverted peacefully.

The only solution is by talks ... That said, these incursions make the progress of the talks slow, by increasing mistrust.

They should come to a complete end, as per mutually agreed border arrangements.

 

[djsjs]

There is agreement, not to fire in face-offs.

Good that sane senses prevailed both times, when the "tent" was rolled back peacefully .... as with the chinese "horse and pony" incursions reverted peacefully.

The only solution is by talks ... That said, these incursions make the progress of the talks slow, by increasing mistrust.

They should come to a complete end, as per mutually agreed border arrangements.

if there is a NO FIRE agreement ? why does Inida need teen more times of our solders,and still adding?

 

[kurup]

if there is a NO FIRE agreement ? why does Inida need teen more times of our solders,and still adding?

No fire agreements is for stand-offs , I guess .

We are raising the battalion in case of war , not that it will happen . But better safe than sorry .

 

[AADHAAR]

Indian troops suspend patrols at Chumar - Times Of India

Even if it were true (Indian Govt says these "news reports" have nothing to do with reality), this doesn't change the border issue at all.

PRC is in illegal occupation of Aksai Chin (part of Ladakh).

As I said, India and China never shared a border in all history. China came into the picture only after its occupation of Tibet in 1959.
(and further incursions, after occupation of Tibet brought PLA into some parts of Ladakh).

The occupation of Ladakh was by surreptitious incursion .. nothing changed during 1962 or 1987 or 2013.

India didn't sign any agreement consequent to 1962 (chinese withdrew unilaterally, after Nehru refused to sign anything - ceasefire or even any damn piece of paper for that matter).

So, things stand the same as they did at the time of illegal chinese occupation of Aksai chin in 1959.

Both sides have agreed to resolve the issue by talks ..... since both know, force is not a solution.

 

[kurup]

India has ten more times solders than China along the border. what are those fatheads doing there if they cann't stop our solders?
if ten times is not enough, what about 20 times?

When each side find the other , they stop each other . But fire exchange don't happen because soldiers understand that the stand-offs are in territory disputed by both .

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

Both sides have agreed to resolve the issue by talks ..... since both know, force is not a solution.

Which one of your disputed borders has not seen the use of Force?

Disputed borders and the use of Military Force go hand in hand.

It has been the same way throughout human history.

When foreign soldiers launch an incursion deep into your territory, the standard procedure is to forcefully remove them.

 

[Developereo]

Bharat Verma is another war monger chap.....a Zaid Hamid clone who will never talk peace regardless its Pakistan or even Russia & US. Such jokers are better ignored than having a serious thought over their brainfarts time n again

Exactly.

He is just trying to cash in on the incursion-related hysteria by the Indian media.

After all, why should others have all the fun (and $$$)?

 

[Shinigami]

if there is a NO FIRE agreement ? why does Inida need teen more times of our solders,and still adding?

your side (Tibet) is mostly plain and conductive to infra development, this makes it easy to transport troops fast. the indian side however, is very hilly and difficult to even build roads making troop movement tough. so it makes more sense for india to station a lot of troops on the chinese border