Interesting how you concluded that....Who died when IK did speeches in different cities Pry do tell me!
Plz differentiate Qadri from IK first than talk.
Same question can be asked HOW DARE SHARIFF brothers kill our brothers...Everyone has a right to their choice in govt or party ISNT THAT WHAT DEMOCRACY IS?
How about what NS did Ordering for the people to die Do you think they died in the dharana or were they killed by people who got afraid of people with a tongue....I dont support Qadri nor do I support SS calling out the shots to shoot people!
Now may I ask DID SHARIFF BROS NOT FEEL AN OUNCE OF SHAME for calling the shooting of people?
I am only for IK for 1 reason he wants change and he wants to improve the system...Now if your brain sitting in USA cant work it doesnt justify your attitude! Being in USA when the hell has DEMOCRATIC USA ever called people to be shot...GULLU BUTT types to vandalize or that sunsilk guy with guns to TERRORIZE people based on their party choice ??
Now talk about shame here!
The people you are crying fake tears and calling shameful act didnt die coz they supported QADRI (I cant be bothered if he got shot) BUT COZ SOMEONE peed in his pants and asked them to be shot! Instead of going shame shame on the one who called the shots you are blaming freedom of choice?
NONE of your comments above make sense, nor are they coherent to tell a story or compel others of any GOOD purpose that is behind this march but destruction of an entire system for ONE individual supported by 5% of the population. Read the above parts:
1) People got killed and people got hurt in by a movement of violence. IK and Qadri both are to be blamed. Anyone who got killed and hurt, their blood is on these two's heads. How do you differentiate two parties with the same devastating agenda to bring down a system through lies, propaganda and entirely unethical and undemocratic values?
2) If both of these idiots had demonstrated PEACEFUL marches in their speeches vs. threatening to topple the government, get their people to kill the ruling leadership, threatening Police to not interfere, you won't have any incident. You fu*ck with the system and you get to find out how strong the system is.
There was a big rally in Missouri a couple of days ago due to someone who got shot by the Police. They did a protest and it seemed like it'll turn violent. Guess what? There was TEAR GAS and EVERYTHING used to control the riots from becoming violent and to ensure PUBLIC SAFETY. And trust me, if someone in that protest tried to shoot a police officer or destroy buildings, law enforcement teams would use whatever measures they have to, to ensure public safety. And this is in the great USA which is a huge democratic system.
In Pakistan, you guys kill police officers and kidnap them and threaten them, while they are ONLY ensuring public safety. If you think someone didn't behave well, you go to the court for justice. Not get a gun out and start shooting, that's violence. But this is how IK and Mullah Greedy think.
Why did IK and Mullah Greedy made extreme and violent threats? The system will come into motion to try to protect people. Both of these guys WERE and ARE betting on body bags to cry Victim. This is how manly-man they are. And you are going to tell me why the system got into motion when Policemen were kidnapped and plaza's were destroyed and all??
3) Democracy DOES NOT mean everyone has a right inside the government. That is where your head STILL doesn't get it. Democracy is MAJORITY of the POPULATION rules. Minority winners (like IK and PPP) GO BACK PEACEFULLY and analyze why they lost. They play a productive opposition and support the system. The lost party/ies changes strategy and does more work for the PEOPLE to WIN their votes for the next elections. What in this process looks ANYTHING like what IK is doing? He's not done JACK from where he actually won the most from (KPK).
4) Where is the proof that NS or his senior leadership called for any killings? I'd like to see it and I am sure so will the readers here too. If the shootings were ACTUALLY ordered as you accuse, then they should be investigated by the court. You should file a case and provide legal support to your evidence.
Now if the judge turns it down and you go to the next court and that turns it down also, that MEANS you don't have strong enough evidence. But somehow, I believe it'll become another "all the judges, the media, the foreign everything, the angels, the truck drivers around that area and all the dogs and cats around the crime scene were paid to lie". It sounds a lie from a script like the rest of them you guys say all the time and its pathetic and ludicrous actually.
5) Freedom of choice? That was what the elections were about 15 months ago. And people DID choose very freely who they wanted to run the country. The international correspondence all said that.
The marches don't have 100% people behind them (heck not even 1% of the population is behind them), the freedom of choice that these failed marches represent are a violent gun-point games by a few thousand that are trying to "force" their "freedom of choice" onto 200 MILLION people strong democracy.
How the heck is that freedom of choice when you are actually involved in hijacking democracy through undemocratic, unconstitutional and unethical means???? If this was freedom of choice and revolution and if people REALLY gave a rats as* about this seriously, you'd have about 30 or 50 million people out on the streets, after which, if the current government wanted to stay in power, they'd be dragged out of their palaces and put in the jail by the PEOPLE.
But here, you have a few thousand thugs trying to enjoy vacation time by taking a trip to Islamabad and causing death, injuries, destruction and a loss of many billions, all in a pis* pour country that could use every million it has additional, to do something for its people.