Ace of Spades
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2017
- Messages
- 1,465
- Reaction score
- 30
- Country
- Location
jahalat is when you don't read the whole reply and labeling a critic "pujari". Shows you lack the arguments and flaring up for the question you cannot answer.Oh andhay imran kay pujari
Name me a single first world country where a politician is entitled to keep his life private!? When you become a politician, you forgo that right.
Marrying some one is not discussed all over the world as something bad, but by this low level mindset of Patwaris. Having an extra marital affair can be and should be discussed; which of course is not the case here. If you yourself have such criteria of public life, lots of marital questions can be asked about mariam nawaz, her daughters and kulsoom nawaz and of course patwaris' beloved noora ganja and his brother, but that will be outside the boundaries of decency of this public forum.
The food part was a joke. But even that isn't actually private life in a country where most are malnutritioned.
Just look at the argument you are giving; you are trying to argue just for the sake of argument with no content.
If IK takes drugs we have the right to know. If the umpires ungli is what's controlling him, we have a right to know. If he marries someone purely because his pir told him, we have a right to know. If hes an abusive husband, we have a right to know. If he has a sort spot for the taliban, we have the right to know. This man could be the future PM of Pakistan, we have the right to know what kind of man he is, including in his personal life!
Do he take drugs? If so, he should be arrested; drug tests must be done. If found guilty must be punished. Umpire ki ungli argument must be investigated. If some conspiracy is found, punish the perpetrators. If he marry someone because his pir told him or someone else we have no right to know. If he is asked the question in person by media and he accepts it, that should be the end of discussion and vice versa. Claiming and talking things out of thin air is something else while being over smart is other. On his Taliban rhetoric i personally am against his stated policy and what he stood for.
When this issue came out, most pti pujaris stuck with the personal issue defence, yet clearly this personal issue showed what a lier this man is.
PTI supporters are now no different than patwaris / jiyalas, and worship IK no matter what he does. Just look at any thread where IK is being justifiably criticised, and you will see the truth.
Not most, i voted for IK in last elections but still criticize him and publicly bash him for what he is doing wrong or have done wrong. What others do is their concern but i am of belief that PTI supporters must hold IK accountable and question him since we claim to be unlike patwaris.
Finally, NS is corrupt. We all know. But to claim IK is not is just a plain lie.
corruption noun 1. "dishonest or fraudulent conduct by those in power, typically involving bribery."
By definition of corruption he is not corrupt, haven't been proved. Is he a liar or have been involved in other wrongdoings? Yes! Do i have reservations on his party policies and they way he is governing, yes! But that's not the debate! is it?