SuvarnaTeja
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2018
- Messages
- 4,313
- Reaction score
- -42
- Country
- Location
This is just face saving step by IMF as Pakistan no longer needs IMF after the support received from Saudi Arabia, UAE & China.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's one thing to have poor economic conditions, it's another to have poor economists. Fundamental issues with that country which will take decades to fix, if at all possible.
Calm down, they didnt come at their own. GOP invited them. Hats off to the elite class has this country for creating mess.Why should Pakistan endure this Insult? Who are these goras to dictate tax policies? $crew them. China/Saudi/UAE/Malaysia/Turkey are enough.
Because china sent him empty handed back.
The thing is if Pakistan had rigorously implemented previous IMF reforms it wouldnt have been in this situation in the first place.. Implementing IMF reforms became political in Pakistani politics leading to its predicament...
They just take your foreign policy. No ?
wait 2 more weeks and come eat your humble pieBecause china sent him empty handed back.
you are already for sale to the highest bidder
With 70% of the economic activities undocumented/unregulated/untaxed according to the public accountants, Pak has a natural cushion for all the tough measures!!! Not to mention, no regulation or taxation means no hindrance to growth...
Which is better one taking over the economic policy or the one taking over the countryThey just take your foreign policy. No ?
"Official sources confided to The News on late Friday night that Pakistan’s negotiating team was quite weak except three officials belonging to each from the Ministry of Finance, State Bank of Pakistan and the Federal Board of Revenue. “We have never witnessed such a weak team negotiating with the IMF,” said one independent economist while talking to The News here on Friday."
It's one thing to have poor economic conditions, it's another to have poor economists. Fundamental issues with that country which will take decades to fix, if at all possible.
Which is better one taking over the economic policy or the one taking over the country